Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzz_dumps

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 82 41.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 118 59.0%
All colors 200 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
17 109 tomlkit._compat.decode call site: 00109 contextlib.suppress
11 31 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00031 collections.abc.MutableMapping.items
11 165 tomlkit.items.Time.__init__ call site: 00165 datetime.datetime.isoformat
8 153 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00153 tomlkit.items.Date.__init__
7 94 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00094 collections.abc.MutableMapping.items
7 145 tomlkit.items.DateTime.__init__ call site: 00145 datetime.datetime.isoformat
6 50 tomlkit.items.AoT.__init__ call site: 00050 tomlkit.items.item
4 195 tomlkit.items.Array.as_string call site: 00195 v.value.as_string
3 44 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00044 .isinstance
1 1 ...fuzz_dumps.test_one_input call site: 00001 fdp.ConsumeInt
1 24 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00024 .isinstance
1 58 tomlkit.items.Table.append call site: 00058 tomlkit.items.item

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
270
Functions that are reachable but not covered
67
Reachable functions
99
Percentage of reachable functions covered
32.32%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_dumps 4
tomlkit.api 18
tomlkit.items 64
tomlkit._compat 10
tomlkit._utils 7

Fuzzer: fuzz_parser

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 157 20.8%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 597 79.1%
All colors 754 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
17 5 tomlkit._compat.decode call site: 00005 contextlib.suppress
12 469 tomlkit.container.Container._replace_at call site: 00469 tomlkit.items.Table.append
11 361 tomlkit.items.Time.__init__ call site: 00361 builtins.int.isoformat
11 438 tomlkit.container.Container._replace_at call site: 00438 tomlkit.container.Container._insert_at
10 276 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00276 builtins.list.items
8 349 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00349 tomlkit.items.Date.__init__
7 319 tomlkit.items.item call site: 00319 datetime.datetime.items
7 341 tomlkit.items.DateTime.__init__ call site: 00341 builtins.int.isoformat
6 307 tomlkit.items.AoT.__init__ call site: 00307 tomlkit.items.item
6 701 tomlkit.parser.Parser._parse_table call site: 00701 tomlkit.items.Table.__init__
5 392 tomlkit.container.Container.append call site: 00392 .isinstance
4 432 tomlkit.container.Container._replace_at call site: 00432 tomlkit.items.SingleKey.__init__

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
269
Functions that are reachable but not covered
117
Reachable functions
217
Percentage of reachable functions covered
46.08%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
/ 1
...fuzz_parser 4
tomlkit.parser 102
tomlkit._compat 10
tomlkit.source 10
tomlkit.toml_char 2
tomlkit.items 67
tomlkit._utils 19
tomlkit.container 61