High level conclusions

Fuzzer fuzz_parse_data_uri is blocked:

The runtime code coverage of fuzz_parse_data_uri covers 10.52% of its statically reachable code. This means there is some place that blocks the fuzzer to continue exploring more code at run time.

Fuzzer fuzz_safe_download_url is blocked:

The runtime code coverage of fuzz_safe_download_url covers 14.28% of its statically reachable code. This means there is some place that blocks the fuzzer to continue exploring more code at run time.

Fuzzer fuzz_url_safe is blocked:

The runtime code coverage of fuzz_url_safe covers 13.04% of its statically reachable code. This means there is some place that blocks the fuzzer to continue exploring more code at run time.

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

5 / 55

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

23 / 190

Runtime code coverage of functions

11 / 55

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer: fuzz_url_safe

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	7	21.2%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	26	78.7%
All colors	33	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
3	6	w3lib.util.to_unicode	call site: 00006	.isinstance
2	1	...fuzz_url_safe.TestOneInput	call site: 00001	fdp.ConsumeIntInRange
2	30	w3lib.url.safe_url_string	call site: 00030	urllib.parse.urlsplit.fragment.encode

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

16

Functions that are reachable but not covered

20

Reachable functions

23

Percentage of reachable functions covered

13.04%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/	1
...fuzz_url_safe	4
w3lib.url	15
w3lib.util	3

Fuzzer: fuzz_safe_download_url

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	6	15.0%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	34	85.0%
All colors	40	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
3	7	w3lib.util.to_unicode	call site: 00007	.isinstance
2	31	w3lib.url.safe_url_string	call site: 00031	urllib.parse.urlsplit.fragment.encode
1	3	...fuzz_safe_download_url.TestOneInput	call site: 00003	w3lib.url.safe_download_url

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

16

Functions that are reachable but not covered

24

Reachable functions

28

Percentage of reachable functions covered

14.29%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/	1
...fuzz_safe_download_url	4
w3lib.url	20
w3lib.util	3

Fuzzer: fuzz_parse_data_uri

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is

Color	Runtime hitcount	Callsite count	Percentage
red	0	5	9.80%
gold	[1:9]	0	0.0%
yellow	[10:29]	0	0.0%
greenyellow	[30:49]	0	0.0%
lawngreen	50+	46	90.1%
All colors	51	100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked	Calltree index	Parent function	Callsite	Largest blocked function
3	8	w3lib.util.to_unicode	call site: 00008	.isinstance
2	32	w3lib.url.safe_url_string	call site: 00032	urllib.parse.urlsplit.fragment.encode

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions

16

Functions that are reachable but not covered

34

Reachable functions

38

Percentage of reachable functions covered

10.53%

NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.

Function name	source code lines	source lines hit	percentage hit

Files reached

filename	functions hit
/	1
...fuzz_parse_data_uri	4
w3lib.url	31
w3lib.util	3

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name	Functions filename	Arg count	Args	Function depth	hitcount	instr count	bb count	cyclomatic complexity	Reachable functions	Incoming references	total cyclomatic complexity	Unreached complexity
w3lib.encoding.html_to_unicode	w3lib.encoding	4	['N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A', 'N/A']	4	0	1	5	5	22	0	75	62

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers

12 / 55

Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers

49 / 190

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name	Functions filename	Args	Function call depth	Reached by Fuzzers	Fuzzers runtime hit	Func lines hit %	I Count	BB Count	Cyclomatic complexity	Functions reached	Reached by functions	Accumulated cyclomatic complexity	Undiscovered complexity

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

/src/fuzz_url_safe.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['w3lib.util.to_unicode', '...fuzz_url_safe.TestOneInput', 'w3lib.url.safe_url_string']

/src/fuzz_safe_download_url.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['w3lib.util.to_unicode', 'w3lib.url.safe_url_string', '...fuzz_safe_download_url.TestOneInput']

/src/fuzz_parse_data_uri.py

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag

Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['w3lib.util.to_unicode', 'w3lib.url.safe_url_string']

This section shows analysis of runtime coverage data.

For futher technical details on how this section is generated, please see the Glossary .

Complex functions with low coverage

Func name	Function total lines	Lines covered at runtime	percentage covered	Reached by fuzzers

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file	Reached by	Covered by
	[]	[]
codecs	[]	[]
...fuzz_url_safe	['fuzz_url_safe']	[]
w3lib._infra	[]	[]
typing	[]	[]
w3lib._url	[]	[]
w3lib.encoding	[]	[]
w3lib.util	['fuzz_url_safe', 'fuzz_safe_download_url', 'fuzz_parse_data_uri']	[]
urllib	[]	[]
w3lib.url	['fuzz_url_safe', 'fuzz_safe_download_url', 'fuzz_parse_data_uri']	[]
w3lib.html	[]	[]
warnings	[]	[]
posixpath	[]	[]
html	[]	[]
atheris	[]	[]
	[]	[]
w3lib._types	[]	[]
os	[]	[]
base64	[]	[]
w3lib.http	[]	[]
...fuzz_safe_download_url	['fuzz_safe_download_url']	[]
string	[]	[]
w3lib	[]	[]
re	[]	[]
...fuzz_parse_data_uri	['fuzz_parse_data_uri']	[]
encodings	[]	[]

Directories in report

Directory