Fuzz introspector
For issues and ideas: https://github.com/ossf/fuzz-introspector/issues
Report generation date: 2025-07-11

Project overview: zlib-ng

High level conclusions

Reachability and coverage overview

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
5.0%
25 / 547
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
5.0%
62 / 1374
Runtime code coverage of functions
23.0%
124 / 547

Warning: The number of runtime covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that Fuzz Introspector found there are more functions covered at runtime than what is considered reachable based on the static analysis. This is a limitation in the analysis as anything covered at runtime is by definition reachable by the fuzzers.
This is likely due to a limitation in the static analysis. In this case, the count of functions covered at runtime is the true value, which means this is what should be considered "achieved" by the fuzzer.

Use the project functions table below to query all functions that were not covered at runtime.

Project functions overview

The following table shows data about each function in the project. The functions included in this table correspond to all functions that exist in the executables of the fuzzers. As such, there may be functions that are from third-party libraries.

For further technical details on the meaning of columns in the below table, please see the Glossary .

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzzer details

Fuzzer: fuzzer_checksum

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 14 28.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 36 72.0%
All colors 50 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
14 1 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00001 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
43
Functions that are reachable but not covered
8
Reachable functions
9
Percentage of reachable functions covered
11.11%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_checksum.c 4
deflate.c 10

Fuzzer: fuzzer_example_flush

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 39 82.9%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 8 17.0%
All colors 47 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
15 29 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00029 PREFIX
14 1 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00001 PREFIX
10 18 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00018 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
118
Functions that are reachable but not covered
11
Reachable functions
14
Percentage of reachable functions covered
21.43%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_flush.c 6
deflate.c 10
test/example.c 7
test/minigzip.c 2

Fuzzer: fuzzer_example_small

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 37 82.2%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 8 17.7%
All colors 45 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
14 1 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00001 PREFIX
13 29 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00029 PREFIX
10 18 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00018 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
96
Functions that are reachable but not covered
12
Reachable functions
15
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_small.c 6
deflate.c 10
test/example.c 8
test/minigzip.c 2

Fuzzer: fuzzer_example_large

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 59 89.3%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 7 10.6%
All colors 66 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
49 3 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00003 zng_deflateSetParams
10 53 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00053 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
113
Functions that are reachable but not covered
11
Reachable functions
14
Percentage of reachable functions covered
21.43%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_large.c 5
test/example.c 8
deflate.c 13
test/minigzip.c 2

Fuzzer: fuzzer_example_dict

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 46 92.0%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 4 8.0%
All colors 50 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
26 1 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00001 PREFIX
20 28 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00028 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
135
Functions that are reachable but not covered
12
Reachable functions
15
Percentage of reachable functions covered
20.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_dict.c 4
test/example.c 9
deflate.c 10
test/minigzip.c 2

Fuzzer: fuzzer_compress

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 14 37.8%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 23 62.1%
All colors 37 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
14 1 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00001 PREFIX

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
135
Functions that are reachable but not covered
12
Reachable functions
16
Percentage of reachable functions covered
25.0%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_compress.c 12
deflate.c 10

Fuzzer: fuzzer_minigzip

Call tree

The calltree shows the control flow of the fuzzer. This is overlaid with coverage information to display how much of the potential code a fuzzer can reach is in fact covered at runtime. In the following there is a link to a detailed calltree visualisation as well as a bitmap showing a high-level view of the calltree. For further information about these topics please see the glossary for full calltree and calltree overview

Call tree overview bitmap:

The distribution of callsites in terms of coloring is
Color Runtime hitcount Callsite count Percentage
red 0 88 81.4%
gold [1:9] 0 0.0%
yellow [10:29] 0 0.0%
greenyellow [30:49] 0 0.0%
lawngreen 50+ 20 18.5%
All colors 108 100

Fuzz blockers

The following nodes represent call sites where fuzz blockers occur.

Amount of callsites blocked Calltree index Parent function Callsite Largest blocked function
26 10 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00010 gz_compress
25 69 file_uncompress call site: 00069 gz_uncompress
13 37 gz_compress call site: 00037 PREFIX
13 52 gz_compress call site: 00052 PREFIX
3 2 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00002
2 66 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00066
2 95 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00095
2 100 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00100
1 6 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00006
1 106 LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput call site: 00106

Runtime coverage analysis

Covered functions
160
Functions that are reachable but not covered
28
Reachable functions
33
Percentage of reachable functions covered
15.15%
NB: The sum of covered functions and functions that are reachable but not covered need not be equal to Reachable functions . This is because the reachability analysis is an approximation and thus at runtime some functions may be covered that are not included in the reachability analysis. This is a limitation of our static analysis capabilities.
Warning: The number of covered functions are larger than the number of reachable functions. This means that there are more functions covered at runtime than are extracted using static analysis. This is likely a result of the static analysis component failing to extract the right call graph or the coverage runtime being compiled with sanitizers in code that the static analysis has not analysed. This can happen if lto/gold is not used in all places that coverage instrumentation is used.
Function name source code lines source lines hit percentage hit

Files reached

filename functions hit
test/fuzz/fuzzer_minigzip.c 16
test/minigzip.c 25
deflate.c 10

Analyses and suggestions

Optimal target analysis

Remaining optimal interesting functions

The following table shows a list of functions that are optimal targets. Optimal targets are identified by finding the functions that in combination, yield a high code coverage.

Func name Functions filename Arg count Args Function depth hitcount instr count bb count cyclomatic complexity Reachable functions Incoming references total cyclomatic complexity Unreached complexity
zng_tr_flush_block /src/zlib-ng/trees.c 4 ['deflate_state*', 'char*', 'uint32_t', 'int'] 7 0 41 8 9 51 0 117 110
block_state::deflate_medium /src/zlib-ng/deflate_medium.c 2 ['deflate_state*', 'int'] 4 0 75 16 25 29 0 73 65
gz_write /src/zlib-ng/gzwrite.c 3 ['gz_state*', 'void*', 'size_t'] 7 0 41 12 16 25 0 61 56
crc32_chorba_sse41 /src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chorba_sse41.c 3 ['uint32_t', 'uint8_t*', 'size_t'] 3 0 23 6 6 39 0 57 52
adler32_avx512_vnni /src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx512_vnni.c 3 ['uint32_t', 'uint8_t*', 'size_t'] 5 0 53 7 9 69 0 50 48
zng_inflate_table /src/zlib-ng/inftrees.c 6 ['codetype', 'uint16_t*', 'unsigned', 'code**', 'unsigned*', 'uint16_t*'] 1 0 130 21 44 4 3 48 45
LONGEST_MATCH /src/zlib-ng/match_tpl.h 2 ['deflate_state*', 'Pos'] 3 0 120 24 42 13 0 45 42

Implementing fuzzers that target the above functions will improve reachability such that it becomes:

Functions statically reachable by fuzzers
25.0%
135 / 547
Cyclomatic complexity statically reachable by fuzzers
35.0%
480 / 1374

All functions overview

If you implement fuzzers for these functions, the status of all functions in the project will be:

Func name Functions filename Args Function call depth Reached by Fuzzers Runtime reached by Fuzzers Combined reached by Fuzzers Fuzzers runtime hit Func lines hit % I Count BB Count Cyclomatic complexity Functions reached Reached by functions Accumulated cyclomatic complexity Undiscovered complexity

Fuzz engine guidance

This sections provides heuristics that can be used as input to a fuzz engine when running a given fuzz target. The current focus is on providing input that is usable by libFuzzer.

test/fuzz/fuzzer_checksum.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_flush.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_small.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_large.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_dict.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_compress.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput']

test/fuzz/fuzzer_minigzip.c

Dictionary

Use this with the libFuzzer -dict=DICT.file flag


Fuzzer function priority

Use one of these functions as input to libfuzzer with flag: -focus_function name

-focus_function=['LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput', 'file_uncompress', 'gz_compress']

Fuzz driver synthesis

New fuzzers

The below fuzzers are templates and suggestions for how to target the set of optimal functions above

trees.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/trees.c
Target functions: zng_tr_flush_block
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target zng_tr_flush_block */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_0;
  char *new_var1 = ada_safe_get_char_p();
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_2;
  int new_var3 = ada_safe_get_int();
  zng_tr_flush_block(unknown_0, new_var1, unknown_2, new_var3);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

deflate_medium.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/deflate_medium.c
Target functions: block_state::deflate_medium
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target block_state::deflate_medium */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_4;
  int new_var5 = ada_safe_get_int();
  block_state::deflate_medium(unknown_4, new_var5);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

gzwrite.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/gzwrite.c
Target functions: gz_write
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target gz_write */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_6;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_7;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_8;
  gz_write(unknown_6, unknown_7, unknown_8);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

chorba_sse41.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chorba_sse41.c
Target functions: crc32_chorba_sse41
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target crc32_chorba_sse41 */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_9;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_10;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_11;
  crc32_chorba_sse41(unknown_9, unknown_10, unknown_11);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

adler32_avx512_vnni.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx512_vnni.c
Target functions: adler32_avx512_vnni
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target adler32_avx512_vnni */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_12;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_13;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_14;
  adler32_avx512_vnni(unknown_12, unknown_13, unknown_14);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

inftrees.c

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/inftrees.c
Target functions: zng_inflate_table
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target zng_inflate_table */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_15;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_16;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_17;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_18;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_19;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_20;
  zng_inflate_table(unknown_15, unknown_16, unknown_17, unknown_18, unknown_19, unknown_20);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

match_tpl.h

Target file: /src/zlib-ng/match_tpl.h
Target functions: LONGEST_MATCH
#include "ada_fuzz_header.h"

int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
  af_safe_gb_init(data, size);

  /* target LONGEST_MATCH */
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_21;
  UNKNOWN_TYPE unknown_22;
  LONGEST_MATCH(unknown_21, unknown_22);

  af_safe_gb_cleanup();
}

Files and Directories in report

This section shows which files and directories are considered in this report. The main reason for showing this is fuzz introspector may include more code in the reasoning than is desired. This section helps identify if too many files/directories are included, e.g. third party code, which may be irrelevant for the threat model. In the event too much is included, fuzz introspector supports a configuration file that can exclude data from the report. See the following link for more information on how to create a config file: link

Files in report

Source file Reached by Covered by
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/adler32_rvv.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/cpu_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_stored.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/compare256_avx512.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/adler32_vmx.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/adler32_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_compare256_rle.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/fallback_builtins.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_crc32.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_common.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_compare256_rle.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_checksum.c ['fuzzer_checksum'] ['fuzzer_checksum']
/src/zlib-ng/deflate.c ['fuzzer_checksum', 'fuzzer_example_flush', 'fuzzer_example_small', 'fuzzer_example_large', 'fuzzer_example_dict', 'fuzzer_compress', 'fuzzer_minigzip'] ['fuzzer_example_flush', 'fuzzer_example_small', 'fuzzer_example_large', 'fuzzer_example_dict', 'fuzzer_compress', 'fuzzer_minigzip']
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chorba_sse2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/slide_ppc_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx512.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_large.c ['fuzzer_example_large'] ['fuzzer_example_large']
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_uncompress.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/slide_hash_sse2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/crc32_fold_vpclmulqdq_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/crc32_braid_comb.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_minigzip.c ['fuzzer_minigzip'] ['fuzzer_minigzip']
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_deflate.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/crc32_power8.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/adler32_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_sse42.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx512_vnni.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/minigzip.c ['fuzzer_example_flush', 'fuzzer_example_small', 'fuzzer_example_large', 'fuzzer_example_dict', 'fuzzer_minigzip'] []
/src/zlib-ng/tools/maketrees.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/crc32_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/tools/makefixed.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/chunkset_neon.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/acle_intrins.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/slide_hash_rvv.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx512_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/crc32_braid_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/crc32_armv8.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_adler32.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/compare256_power9.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/crc32_zbc.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/tools/makecrct.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_png_shared.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/compare256_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/zutil.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/neon_intrins.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_dict.c ['fuzzer_example_dict'] ['fuzzer_example_dict']
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/slide_hash_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_adler32.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/compare256_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_huff.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/crc32_chorba_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/zutil_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/arm_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/gzlib.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_compress.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_deflate.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_ssse3_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_compress_bound.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/insert_string.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_compress.c ['fuzzer_compress'] ['fuzzer_compress']
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_deflate_bound.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/crc32_braid_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/adler32_fold_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/gzwrite.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/compare256_rle.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/inftrees.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/x86_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_inflate.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/adler32.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/match_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/slide_hash_armv6.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/inffast_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/slide_hash_neon.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_small.c ['fuzzer_example_small'] ['fuzzer_example_small']
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx2_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_fast.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/minideflate.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/adler32_neon.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_avx2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_deflate_concurrency.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/compare256_neon.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_adler32_copy.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chunkset_avx512.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_large_buffers.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_png_decode.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/zmemory.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/crc32_pclmulqdq_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_medium.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/test_compare256.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/insert_string_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_quick.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/s390_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/infback.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/adler32_ssse3.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/infcover.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/zbuild.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/crc32_fold_pclmulqdq_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/slide_hash_avx2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_rle.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/crc32-vx.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/adler32_power8.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/chunkset_rvv.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/crc32_braid_comb_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/crc32_fold_c.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/functable.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_detail.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/zutil.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_png_encode.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_compare256.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/riscv_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/trees_emit.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/chunkset_power8.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/gzguts.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/switchlevels.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/dfltcc_inflate.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/example.c ['fuzzer_example_flush', 'fuzzer_example_small', 'fuzzer_example_large', 'fuzzer_example_dict'] []
/src/zlib-ng/deflate_slow.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/inflate.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_slidehash.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/power_features.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/x86_intrins.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/trees.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/compare256_sse2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/power_intrins.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/benchmark_crc32.cc [] []
/src/zlib-ng/functable.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/inflate_p.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chorba_sse41.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/chunkset_avx2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/compare256_avx2.c [] []
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/fuzzer_example_flush.c ['fuzzer_example_flush'] ['fuzzer_example_flush']
/src/zlib-ng/chunkset_tpl.h [] []
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/compare256_rvv.c [] []

Directories in report

Directory
/src/zlib-ng/arch/riscv/
/src/zlib-ng/arch/x86/
/src/zlib-ng/arch/generic/
/src/zlib-ng/test/fuzz/
/src/zlib-ng/arch/arm/
/src/zlib-ng/test/
/src/zlib-ng/arch/power/
/src/zlib-ng/tools/
/src/zlib-ng/test/benchmarks/
/src/zlib-ng/
/src/zlib-ng/arch/s390/