The small non-coding RNA response to virus infection in the Leishmania vector Lutzomyia longipalpis

Sandflies are well known vectors for Leishmania but also transmit a number of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses). Few studies have addressed the interaction between sandflies and arboviruses. RNA interference (RNAi) mechanisms utilize small non-coding RNAs to regulate different aspects of host-pathogen interactions. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathway is a broad antiviral mechanism in insects. In addition, at least in mosquitoes, another RNAi mechanism mediated by PIWI interacting RNAs (piRNAs) is activated by viral infection. Finally, endogenous microRNAs (miRNA) may also regulate host immune responses. Here, we analyzed the small non-coding RNA response to Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection in the sandfly Lutzoymia longipalpis. We detected abundant production of virus-derived siRNAs after VSV infection in adult sandflies. However, there was no production of virus-derived piRNAs and only mild changes in the expression of vector miRNAs in response to infection. We also observed abundant production of virus-derived siRNAs against two other viruses in Lutzomyia Lulo cells. Together, our results suggest that the siRNA but not the piRNA pathway mediates an antiviral response in sandflies. In agreement with this hypothesis, pre-treatment of cells with dsRNA against VSV was able to inhibit viral replication while knock-down of the central siRNA component, Argonaute-2, led to increased virus levels. Our work begins to elucidate the role of RNAi mechanisms in the interaction between L. longipalpis and viruses and should also open the way for studies with other sandfly-borne pathogens.


Introduction
Phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Pshychodidae) are important vectors for a wide range of pathogens [1].Protozoans of the Leishmania genus are the most studied of sandfly-borne pathogens but these insects can also transmit bacteria and viruses.Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) transmitted by sandflies are associated with several human and animal diseases, mostly characterized by flu-like symptoms but also some severe cases of encephalitis [2][3][4].Sandfly-borne viruses belong to several genera including Vesiculovirus (family Rhabdoviridae), Phlebovirus (family Bunyaviridae) and Orbivirus (family Reoviridae) [5][6][7].Vesiculovirus and Orbivirus are mainly restricted to the Americas while Phlebovirus are of important concern in Southern Europe and Turkey [7][8][9][10].The Vesiculovirus genus includes several human and animal pathogens such as Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) that causes outbreaks in cattle and horses [11].Despite the importance of sandfly borne viruses, viral infections remain poorly studied in this vector.Current laboratory models to dissect sandfly-pathogen interactions are mostly restricted to Leishmania [12][13][14] while most information on the transmission of viruses is based on field studies [6,8,15,16].
Arboviruses need to overcome physical and immunological barriers to replicate in the insect vector and be transmitted to the vertebrate host.One of the most important antiviral immune responses in insects is mediated by RNA interference (RNAi).RNAi refers to different mechanisms of regulation of gene expression mediated by small non-coding RNAs [17].The small interfering RNA (siRNA) is considered the main antiviral response in insects [18,19].This pathway is activated by double stranded RNA produced during viral replication that is processed by the RNaseIII enzyme Dicer-2 into 21 nucleotide (nt) siRNAs [20].These siR-NAs are then loaded by Dicer-2 and the small dsRNA binding protein r2d2 onto the nuclease Argonaute-2 (AGO2) to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) that destroys complementary targets [21].The PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway can also be activated during viral infection although it is restricted to certain viruses and insect hosts [22][23][24].In this case, the biogenesis of piRNAs does not require dsRNA specific nucleases such as Dicers.Rather, single stranded piRNA precursors are processed by different nucleases such as Zucchini nuclease and PIWI proteins to generate 24-29 nt small RNAs [25].In addition to RNAi mechanisms that can directly target the virus, host small RNAs may also participate in the immune responses by regulating the expression of endogenous genes.MicroRNAs (miRNA) are endogenous 22 nt small RNAs that control the expression of hundreds of genes [26,27].A large number of immune genes are regulated by host miRNA that can be affected by infection.
The majority of our knowledge about the small RNA response to infection in insects comes from studies in D. melanogaster and mosquitoes [22,24,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].Currently, there is only one study about small RNAs in sandflies by our group, which suggested that the siRNA pathway was not activated by viruses in L. longipalpis [23].
Here, we develop a laboratory model to dissect virus infection in L. longipalpis utilizing VSV that is transmitted by sandflies in the wild [2].Using this model, we analyzed the global small non-coding RNA response to virus infection.We found that VSV strongly induced the production of siRNAs but not piRNAs in adult sandflies.We further demonstrate that this pattern is conserved in response to two novel viruses found in Lulo, a cell line derived from L. longipalpis.Interestingly, VSV did not induce significant changes the profile of vector miR-NAs, which is in agreement with the mild effects observed in infected cells and adult insects.Our data are the first to characterize the small RNA response to viruses and the antiviral role of RNAi in sandflies using a relevant model of VSV infection.This study should open the way for more in depth studies of the role of RNAi in regulating immune responses in sandflies as well as the tripartite interaction between vector, viruses and other pathogens such as Leishmania.

Characterization of VSV infection in L. longipalpis
Previous studies have suggested that sandflies play a role in maintenance and transmission of VSV in nature [7,16,[37][38][39][40].In order to explore the interaction between VSV and sandflies, we initially characterized viral replication in cultured LL5 cells derived from L. longipalpis.Dose-response experiments demonstrated that using different multiplicities of infection (MOI) 0. .These experiments suggested that VSV productively replicates in L. longipalpis cells without causing much damage.Similar observations have been reported elsewhere [41].
We next performed a dose-response experiment to analyze the threshold of VSV infection in vivo.Adult female L. longipalpis were fed with blood containing different concentrations of VSV and the infection was monitored at 2 and 4 days post feeding (dpf).These two time points allowed us to analyze the amount of virus in the inoculum before full blood digestion at 2 dpf from productive infection at 4 dpf.In these experiments, we observed that the minimum concentration required to productively infect sandflies was 10 6 PFU/mL (Fig 2A).At this concentration we observed that about 25% of individuals were infected at 4 dpf, after blood digestion.At higher viral concentrations, 10 7 and 10 8 PFU/mL in the blood meal, over 40 and 60% of adult sandflies were infected at 4 dpf, respectively (Fig 2A).At the highest concentration of VSV in the blood meal, 10 8 PFU/mL, levels of the viral RNA increased continually from 1 to 6 dpf.Infected sandflies at 6 dpf had 100 fold more VSV RNA than the inoculum detected at 1 dpf (Fig 2B).Infectious viral particles were also detected in sandflies throughout the kinetics of infection in vivo (Fig 2C).VSV RNA was not detected in mock infected sandflies, which were used as controls (Fig 2B).We observed no differences in the mortality of sandflies infected by VSV compared to the control group.These results indicate that our laboratory model reproduces the susceptibility of sandflies to VSV observed in field collected insects [7,37].The benign effect of VSV in cells and adult L. longipalpis indicates that the virus is maintained at tolerable levels by the host.These observations are consistent with sandflies working as vectors for this virus in the wild.

Activation of the siRNA pathway by virus infection in sandflies
The siRNA pathway is a major antiviral defense mechanism in insects and could be involved in controlling VSV replication in L. longipalpis.In order to analyze the antiviral response mediated by the siRNA pathway in L. longipalpis, small RNA libraries were constructed using total RNA from VSV infected individuals at 2, 4 and 6 dpf (indicated in Fig 2B ).Mock infected individuals were used as controls.Raw sequencing results from libraries prepared from infected and control individuals were similar (S1 Table ).
We next analyzed the presence of VSV-derived small RNAs in libraries from infected and control sandflies.Control individuals did not show significant accumulation of virus derived The profile of VSV-derived small RNAs in L. longipalpis was very similar to the antiviral siRNA response observed in Drosophila melanogaster [32,36].These results suggest that VSV triggers an antiviral response mediated by the siRNA pathway in sandflies.
In order to investigate whether this was unique to VSV, we sequenced small RNAs from cell lines derived from sandflies and used a metagenomic strategy to identify viruses [23].In one L. longipalpis cell line, Lulo, our strategy identified two novel viruses causing persistent infections.Phylogenetic analysis suggested that they belong to two separate genera of RNA viruses, Luteovirus and Alphapermutotetravirus, and were named Lulo virus 1 and 2, respectively (LV1, LV2) (S2 Fig) .In Lulo cells, both viruses generated small RNAs with a peak of 21 nt in size symmetrically derived from both positive and negative strands of the genome and no 5' base preferences (Fig 3D and 3E).The small RNA profiles observed for LV1 and LV2 are consistent with the activation of siRNA pathway.These results suggest that the siRNA pathway is broadly activated by viral infection in L. longipalpis.It is important to point out that the Lulo and LL5 cell lines were obtained from embryonic tissues [42,43] and therefore may not mimic a bona fide RNAi response produced by a differentiated cell.

The expression of siRNA genes is not modulated by VSV infection
Immune genes are often inducible upon infection in order to optimize the defense response [44,45].In a few cases, increased expression of RNAi genes has been observed in insects and other organisms upon viral infection or exposure to dsRNA [46][47][48].In order to analyze the expression of siRNA genes in sandflies, we first identified in the genome of L. longipalpis genes encoding orthologs to core components of the siRNA pathway, Dicer-2, AGO2 and r2d2.We next measured RNA levels of these genes in LL5 cells and adult female L. longipalpis after VSV infection.There were no significant changes in the expression of Dicer-2, AGO2 and r2d2 in cells between 1 and 48 hpi and sandflies with VSV at 1, 2, 4 and 6 dpf (Fig 4A and 4B).These results indicate that similar to most insects, the activity of the siRNA pathway is not transcriptionally regulated during infections in sandflies.

The siRNA pathway controls VSV infection in L. longipalpis
The generation of VSV-derived siRNAs in L. longipalpis suggested that the siRNA pathway mediates an antiviral response against this virus as observed in D. melanogaster [32,36].In order to investigate whether activation of the siRNA pathway has an antiviral effect in L. longipalpis, we first transfected LL5 cells with dsRNA complementary to VSV prior to virus infection.Pre-engagement of the siRNA pathway with virus-specific dsRNA led to a significant reduction in viral replication at 24

Absence of virus-derived piRNAs in L. longipalpis
In addition to the activation of the siRNA pathway, production of virus-derived piRNAs has been observed during viral infection in dipterans.In vivo, Aedes mosquitoes infected with Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Phasi Charoen like-virus induced clear production of piRNAs [22,23].Virus-derived piRNAs have been detected in cell lines derived from mosquitoes and also other dipterans such as culicoides and D. melanogaster [22,[49][50][51].However, it remains unclear whether other dipterans generate virus-derived piRNAs in vivo since in vitro results lack the context of whole animals.For example, despite numerous efforts, virus-derived piR-NAs have not been detected in adult Drosophila [24].In this regard, sandflies are closely related to mosquitoes and fruit flies and could help understand whether virus-derived piRNAs appeared only in the mosquito lineage or were lost in Drosophila.Thereby we separately analyzed virus-small RNAs in the size range of piRNAs, 24-30 nt, detected both in adult L. longipalpis and cell lines.We observed accumulation of longer virus-derived small RNAs in adult sandflies infected with VSV and Lulo cells infected with LV1 and LV2 (Fig 6A).These small RNAs did not exhibit 1U or 10A enrichment or 10 nt overlap between sense and antisense strands that are considered canonical piRNA characteristics (Fig 6B and 6C).
In order to further investigate the absence of virus-derived piRNAs, we re-analyzed previously published small RNA datasets from L. longipapis infected with three other viruses, LPRV1, LPRV2 and LPNV [23].These viruses had a broad size distribution of smalls RNAs but none showed characteristics of canonical piRNAs (S3 Fig) .Together, our results suggest that the piRNA pathway is not engaged by infection with VSV, LV1 and LV2 in L. longipapis.

The effect of VSV infection on host miRNAs
In addition to the production of virus-derived small RNAs, modulation of host small RNAs, especially miRNAs, may also occur during viral infection in insects [52].Thus, we first analyzed the profile of endogenous small RNAs derived from L. longipalpis in infected and control individuals.We observed no differences in profile of small RNAs between infected and control sandflies.In both cases, the size distribution of small RNAs showed two clear peaks between 21-23 and 24-30 nt representing the typical length of siRNAs/miRNAs and piRNAs, respectively (S4 Fig) .In order to analyze changes in specific small RNAs during VSV infection, we first identified and annotated miRNA genes in the L. longipalpis genome (data from the sandfly genome consortium).In this effort, we were able to identify 206 miRNAs, most of them conserved in other dipterans such as D. melanogaster and A. aegypti.Using this reference, we analyzed differential expression of miRNAs in sandflies infected with VSV compared to control individuals at 2, 4 and 6 dpf.At 2 and 6 dpf, we observed no significant differences in the expression of Lutzomyia miRNAs between infected and control individuals.At 4 dpf, we detected 5 miRNAs that were significantly modulated by VSV infection (Fig 7).llo-miR-11-5p and llo-miR-263a-5p were up-regulated in VSV infected individuals while llo-miR-new3-3p, llo-miR-929-5p and llo-miR-79-3p were down-regulated.However, it is noteworthy that the magnitude of changes in miRNA expression was smaller than 2-fold between infected and control individuals.Together, these results show that VSV infection causes mild changes in host miRNAs and other endogenous small RNAs.However, it is possible that more pronounced changes might be observed if specific tissues are analyzed.

Discussion
Here, we successfully developed a laboratory model to dissect the interaction between sandflies and viruses.Sandflies are well recognized as vectors for species of Leishmania but we lack  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g006[34][35][36].In this regard, our work in sandflies is also an important contribution since most of our understanding about insect small RNA responses to virus infection is based on fruit flies and mosquitoes.
Our results indicate that the siRNA pathway has a conserved antiviral role in sandflies despite previous result from our own group that suggested the absence of virus-derived siR-NAs in Lutzomyia [23].Here, we observed that virus-derived siRNAs are produced in vivo and in vitro and pre-engagement of the siRNA pathway had a direct effect on VSV replication.Furthermore, silencing of AGO2 in Lutzomyia cells leads to increased viral replication, which suggests they fail to control infection.This antiviral role of the siRNA pathway in sandflies is in agreement with numerous observations in insects and other invertebrates [32,53,54].The broad size profile of small RNAs derived from the viruses we described before suggest that they had the ability to inhibit the siRNA pathway in L. longipalpis rather than the absence of such response [55].We note that most studies on the natural antiviral role of RNAi in vector insects have focused on arboviruses that have positive-stranded RNA genomes [22,34,35,56,57].VSV is a negative stranded RNA virus that is controlled by the siRNA pathway during artificial infections in Drosophila [32,36].Our data show that this is also the case in sandflies that are natural vectors for this arbovirus in the wild.
The conspicuous absence of virus-derived piRNAs in sandflies suggests that viruses do not engage the piRNA pathway in these insects.Previous results have indicated that viruses activate the piRNA pathway in mosquitoes but not fruit flies, at least in vivo [22,24].Sandflies provide an important evolutionary perspective since they are closely related to mosquitoes and fruit flies.Therefore, activation of the piRNA pathway by virus infection seems to have been an acquired characteristic of the mosquito lineage although its role in antiviral defense remains unclear.However, it is still possible that activation of the piRNA pathway is limited to certain viruses or restricted to sandfly tissues that were not analyzed in our model.
In addition to activation of siRNA and piRNA pathways targeting the virus, we investigated whether host miRNAs changed in response to infection.Modulation of specific host miRNAs during infection has been observed in insects, which may be part of a coordinated host response to infection or a consequence of viral replication [58].However, we observed that VSV induced little changes in the expression of host miRNAs, which is consistent with this infection being well tolerated by sandflies.
Finally, our model can be further used to dissect more complex interactions involving multiple sandfly-borne pathogens and understand other aspects of immune responses.Notably, epidemiologic data showed strong association between transmission of Leishmania and Phlebovirus in Southern France [59].This result suggests that viruses may affect sandfly vectorial capacity for Leishmania and vice-versa.Viruses may decrease host fitness and affect the ability of sandflies to transmit other pathogens.Good vectors need to tolerate infections to prevent loss of fitness and maintain pathogen levels to allow transmission to a vertebrate host.Our work should allow further studies to dissect the possible effects of tripartite vector-virus-Leishmania interactions in sandflies.It is also important to point out that our work is also the first description of small RNAs in sandflies.This opens the doors for future studies on RNAi mechanisms in other contexts such as the role of specific miRNAs during Leishmania infection.

Viruses
VSV Indiana virus expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were a kind gift from Dr. Curt Horvath (Northwestern University).Stocks were prepared in Vero cells and virus titrations were done by plaque assay.

Plaque assay in mammalian cell
Six-well plates containing Vero monolayers with approximately 90% confluence were inoculated with virus and incubated at 37˚C for 1h in an atmosphere supplemented with 5% of CO 2 .DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS was added to each well in a volume sufficient to maintain cell monolayers during the subsequent incubation period of 72h at 37˚C in atmosphere supplemented with 5% of CO 2 .Vero monolayers were fixed with formalin at 10% (MERCK MILLI-PORE, USA) and stained with crystal violet solution at 1% (SYNTH, Brazil) allowing naked eye observation of cytopathic effects.All samples were tested in triplicate.

Infection of LL5 Lutzomyia cells with VSV
LL5 cells (3x10 6 per well) were seeded in plaque one day prior to infection and infected with VSV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 by directly adding the virus to the culture medium.One hour post infection the culture medium was removed, the cells washed with PBS followed by new culture medium addition.The cells were maintained at 25˚C and the cells and supernatants were harvested for RNA isolation and plaque assay.

Transfection of LL5 Lutzomyia cells with dsRNA
dsRNA targeting L. longipalpis AGO2, VSV and Firefly luciferase were synthesized using the T7 and SP6 megascript kit.7 μg of dsRNA was transfected into LL5 cells using Cellfectin (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.3 days after transfection, cells were infected with a MOI of 1 PFU/cell of VSV.

Laboratory rearing of Lutzomyia longipalpis sandflies
The sandflies used in this study were obtained from a colony reared in the laboratory that was originally started from individuals from Teresina, Brazil, and maintained at the Laboratory of Physiology of Hematophagous Insects (Department of Parasitology, Instituto de Ciências Biolo ´gicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais).Adult sandflies were fed a 70% sucrose solution (w/v) and blood-fed with anesthetized (ketamine, 200 mg/kg) hamsters to trigger egg development.After oviposition, eggs were collected and reared to preserve the colony.All larval instars were fed a crushed mixture of rabbit feces, rabbit chow, and garden soil.Third and fourth instars were supplemented with a mixture of white soy protein and cereal flakes (1:1).The insects were maintained at 27˚C, humidity of 80-95%, and a photoperiod schedule of 12 h light/12 h dark.

Infection of adult sandflies with VSV
Three-day-old female sand flies and private of sugar solution food for a period of 24h were used in this study.The insects were fed with heparinized blood through chick skin membrane attached in an artificial feeder (Hemotek).The artificial infection was performed with blood containing VSV or a control without virus at 37˚C.Fully engorged females were selected and harvested individually at 2, 4 and 6 dpf.Insects were anesthetized with carbon dioxide and directly ground in TRIzol (Invitrogen) using glass beads as previously described [23].

Ethics statement
All procedures involving animals were approved by the ethical review committee of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (CEUA 33/2016 to M.R.V.S).

Analysis of viral RNA replication and gene expression by RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from individual insects and cells using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using 250 ng of random primers specific primers per reaction.The resulting cDNA was used as template for qPCR reaction containing SYBR Green (Invitrogen) and primers specific for the amplification of the genes of interest.The relative amount of the indicated RNAs normalized to an internal control (Rpl32) was calculated using the delta Ct method.Reverse transcription reactions were performed in the absence of primers or enzyme as negative controls for qPCR to ensure the identity of the products.The endogenous gene Rpl32 qPCR was used as normalization standard.Oligonucleotides designed in this study are described in S2 Table.

Small RNA library construction
For libraries construction, individual insects were first tested for the presence and levels of VSV by RT-qPCR.RNA samples were then pooled according to the viral load in each insect.Total RNA extracted from adult insects or cell lines were used from the construction of small RNA libraries.Small RNAs were selected by size (~18-30 nt) on a denaturing PAGE before being used for construction of libraries as described [36].All sequencing runs were performed at the IGBMC Microarray and Sequencing platform, a member of the 'France Ge ´nomique' consortium (ANR-10-INBS-0009), as 1 × 50 base pairs using a HiSeq 2500 instrument.Accession numbers of all libraries described in this study are in S1 Table.
4, 2 and 10 plaque-forming units (PFU)/cell, VSV achieved the same levels of viral RNA at 24 hours post infection (hpi) (S1 Fig).Using 10 PFU/cell, we observed that VSV RNA levels increased early after infection and reached a plateau at 6 hpi that remained similar until 24 hpi (Fig 1A).We also observed that infectious viral particles and viral RNA were detected in supernatant of LL5 cells during early hours of infection (Fig 1B and S1 Fig).Despite clear viral replication, we observed no obvious cytopathic effects (CPE) in LL5 cells after VSV infection (Fig 1C).In contrast, mammalian cell lines (Vero) were completely destroyed by VSV infection (Fig 1C).Mosquito C6/36 cells also displayed CPE such as cell rounding after VSV infection (Fig 1C).Although the kinetics of viral replication was different, LL5 cells generated a similar number of viral particles compared to Vero and C636 cells (Fig 1D)

Fig 1 .
Fig 1. VSV replication in Lutzomyia cell lines.(A) Kinetics of VSV replication in LL5 cell using a MOI of 10 PFU/mL.Statistical significance was determined using Tukey's Multiple Comparison test between infected groups at different times post infection.This experiment is representative of three biological replicates.Significant p values are indicated in the figure.(B) Infectious VSV particles produced in culture supernatants of LL5 cells were assayed by PFU in Vero cell.This experiment is representative of three biological replicates (C) Analysis of cell monolayers at different times after VSV infection in Vero, C636 and LL5 cells.(D) Infectious viral particles produced in the supernatant at different points after VSV infection in Vero, C636 and LL5 cells with a MOI of 0.1 PFU/mL.Experiments are representative of at least two biological replicates.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g001

Fig 2 .
Fig 2. VSV replication in adult L. longipalpis.(A) Adult L. longipalpis sandflies were fed with blood containing different concentrations of VSV and the prevalence of infection was analyzed by RT-qPCR at 2 and 4 dpf.The number of individuals tested is indicated at each time point.(B) Adult sandflies were given a blood meal containing 10 8 PFU/mL of VSV and viral RNA levels in individual sandflies were determined at 1, 2, 4 and 6 dpf.The number of infected individuals is indicated at each time point.Control sandflies (Mock) were fed with blood without virus.Black circles indicate individuals with detectable viral RNA levels.Individuals used to prepare small RNA libraries shown in Fig 3 are indicated in green.Scatter dot plot shows median with interquatile ranges.Statistical significance was determined using Dunn's Multiple Comparison test for infected groups at different times after feeding.Significant p values are indicated in the figure.(C) L. longipalpis were given a blood meal with containing 10 8 PFU/mL of VSV and infectious particles in each individual were assayed by PFU.The number of infected individuals and the total are indicated at each time point.Black circles indicate individuals with detectable infectious particles.Experiments are representative of at least 3 biological replicates.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g002 and 48 hpi compared to control cells treated with a nonrelated dsRNA targeting the Firefly Luciferase gene (Fig 5A).We next utilized dsRNA treatment to silence AGO2, the central component of the siRNA pathway, in LL5 cells.dsRNA treatment lead to a significant reduction in AGO2 levels (Fig 5B).As a result, AGO2 silenced cells had significantly increased viral RNA levels compared to controls cells at 24 and 48 hpi (Fig 5A).These results indicate that the siRNA pathway has an important role in controlling viral infection in L. longipalpis.

Fig 3 .
Fig 3. Production of virus-derived small RNAs in L. longipalpis.(A) Analysis of small RNA libraries from control L. longipalpis (mock) at 2, 4 and 6 dpf shows absence of VSV-derived small RNAs.(B) Size distribution of VSV-derived small RNAs at 2, 4 and 6 dpf in infected L. longipalpis shows a symmetrical peak at 21 nt that is characteristic of siRNAs.(C) Coverage of virus-derived small RNAs along the VSV genome from libraries prepared at 2, 4 and 6 dpf shows homogenous and symmetrical distribution.(D) Size distribution of small RNAs derived from LV1 and LV2 found in Lulo cells derived from Lutzomyia shows a symmetrical peak at 21 nt that is characteristic of siRNAs.(E) Coverage of virus-derived small RNAs along the genome of LV1 and LV2 from libraries prepared from Lulo cells shows homogenous and symmetrical distribution.5' base preferences of small RNAs are indicated by color.Distribution of small RNAs over sense (blue) and anti-sense (brown) strands of the viral genomes are indicated.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g003

Fig 4 .
Fig 4. RNAi pathway genes are not modulated by VSV infection in L. longipalpis.(A) Expression of L. longipalpis genes encoding Dicer-2, AGO2 and r2d2 in control and VSV-infected LL5 cells at different time points.(B) Expression of L. longipalpis genes encoding Dicer-2, AGO2 and r2d2 in adult sandflies fed with a blood meal containing VSV.Control sandflies (Mock) were fed with blood without virus.Black circles indicate individuals with detectable viral RNA levels.Numbers of infected individuals and the total are indicated at each time point.No significant differences were observed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g004

Fig 6 .
Fig 6.Absence of virus-derived piRNAs in L. longipapis.(A) Size distribution of small RNAs derived from VSV, LV1 and LV2 in the 24 to 35 nt range considering each strand separately.5' base preferences are indicated by color.(B) Nucleotide preferences for each position of small RNAs between 24-30 nt are shown as a weblogo.The number of reads analyzed is indicated in brackets.(C) Relative frequency of overlap between 5' end of small RNAs between 24-30 nt in opposite strands.

Fig 7 .
Fig 7. Expression of endogenous miRNAs is mostly unaffected by VSV infection in L. longipalpis.Volcano plots comparing the expression of miRNAs in adult L. longipalpis infected with VSV and control individuals at 2, 4 and 6 dpf.At 4dpf, the expression of 5 miRNAs (indicated in red) was significantly (p<0.05)different between infected and control sandflies.At 2 and 6 dpf, there were no significant differences in miRNA expression.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006569.g007