The "Green Inferno" Racist Controversy: A Deep Dive
The 2013 horror film "The Green Inferno" directed by Eli Roth has been the subject of much controversy, particularly surrounding its portrayal of indigenous tribes and the accusations of racism that have followed it. This article aims to explore the film's contentious reception, the allegations of racism, and the responses from the filmmakers and critics.
Understanding the Film's Plot and Setting
"The Green Inferno" is a survival horror film set in the Amazon rainforest. The story follows a group of New York City students who travel to the Amazon to protest against a construction project that threatens an indigenous tribe. However, their plane crashes, and they find themselves at the mercy of the very tribe they had set out to protect.
The film is a clear nod to the Italian cannibal films of the 1970s and 1980s, which were known for their graphic depictions of violence and their exploitation of indigenous cultures. Roth has stated that he wanted to make a film that paid homage to these films while also exploring the complexities of modern activism and the dangers of naivety.

Accusations of Racism and Cultural Appropriation
Despite Roth's intentions, "The Green Inferno" has been widely criticized for its portrayal of the indigenous tribe. Many have accused the film of racism, arguing that it perpetuates harmful stereotypes about indigenous peoples as savage and violent. The film's use of native tribes as a backdrop for white characters' suffering has also been criticized as a form of cultural appropriation.
Furthermore, the film's depiction of the tribe's rituals and practices has been condemned as insensitive and disrespectful. The tribe in the film engages in cannibalism and human sacrifice, which has been seen as a grotesque and offensive misrepresentation of indigenous cultures.
Eli Roth's Response and Defenses
Eli Roth has consistently defended "The Green Inferno" against accusations of racism, arguing that the film is a critique of Western activism and naivety rather than a condemnation of indigenous cultures. He has stated that the film is a commentary on the dangers of idealism and the complexities of international activism.

Roth has also pointed out that the film was made with the cooperation of the indigenous tribe depicted in the film, the Yawanawá people of Brazil. The tribe was paid for their involvement and was given a percentage of the film's profits. However, this defense has been criticized as a form of "pinkwashing," a term used to describe the practice of using progressive policies or attitudes to deflect from more controversial or harmful practices.
Critical Reception and Impact
The controversy surrounding "The Green Inferno" has had a significant impact on the film's critical reception. While some critics have praised the film for its graphic violence and Roth's direction, others have condemned it for its offensive portrayal of indigenous peoples.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a score of 38% from critics and 31% from audiences. Many of the negative reviews cite the film's problematic portrayal of indigenous cultures as a major flaw. However, the film has also been praised for its exploration of the darker side of activism and its graphic, unsettling violence.
Lessons Learned and Moving Forward
The controversy surrounding "The Green Inferno" highlights the importance of responsible representation in filmmaking. As the film industry becomes increasingly globalized, it is crucial that filmmakers engage with sensitivity and respect when depicting cultures and communities that are not their own.
Moreover, the controversy serves as a reminder of the power of film to shape public perceptions and attitudes. While "The Green Inferno" may have been intended as a critique of activism, its portrayal of indigenous cultures has had real-world consequences, contributing to harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings.
In conclusion, the "Green Inferno" racist controversy is a complex and multifaceted issue that touches on questions of representation, cultural sensitivity, and the responsibilities of filmmakers. While Eli Roth and the film's defenders may argue that the film is a critique rather than a condemnation, the film's portrayal of indigenous cultures has had real-world consequences that cannot be ignored.