|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Millennials were supposed to be the generation that fixed things. We were told this over and over again, sometimes admiringly, sometimes with suspicion. We were audacious. Radical. Too loud. Too questioning. We were the first Internet generation, the first cohort to come of age with Google in our pockets and global conversations at our fingertips. We were educated. Politically aware. Digitally fluent. And for a brief, electric moment, it felt like the world was opening up just for us.
In Kenya, especially, the promise felt real. We grew up at the tail end of a suffocating political era and came of age during what felt like a national rebirth. New leadership. New freedoms. A booming economy, or so it seemed. Education was sold to us as the great equalizer. Work hard, follow the rules, get the papers, and the system would reward you. The future was bureaucratic, stable, predictable. And we were trained for it meticulously. So what happened? Why is it that so many Millennials, now in our thirties and forties, feel exhausted, cynical, emotionally brittle? Why are our relationships strained, our optimism dulled, our dreams postponed indefinitely? Why do so many of us feel like we did everything right and still somehow lost?
To understand the Millennial condition, especially in Kenya, you have to understand the bargain we were raised to believe in. Ours was the generation of mass education. Degrees multiplied. Campuses mushroomed. Everyone was told to go to school, to get credentials, to become employable. The education system we inherited was not designed to create rebels or innovators. It was designed to produce clerks, administrators, managers, professionals who could keep a newly independent state running smoothly. Follow the rules. Respect authority. Don’t make noise. Excellence would be rewarded.
For the children of the post-independence bourgeoisie, this message was especially loud. Many of us grew up in homes that prized obedience as virtue. Questioning was discouraged. Risk was frowned upon. Stability was everything. The state was the ultimate employer. Institutions were to be trusted. Systems were real. We internalized this deeply. It didn’t just shape our career choices. It shaped our personalities. We learned to seek permission. To wait our turn. To believe that correctness would save us. That if we were good enough, smart enough, compliant enough, the system would eventually open its doors. It worked. Until it didn’t.
One sunny weekend afternoon, seated in a friend’s garden, a conversation crystallized just how thoroughly that bargain had collapsed. Dr Reign Mwendwa, a paediatrician who is also a creative director and hip hop artist, spoke with disarming clarity about what becoming a doctor actually looks like for this generation.
“One of the first realizations,” he said, “is that medicine is an extremely long journey. Your peers who were with you in high school are already earning money while you’re still in school.” Friends who chose shorter degrees began building lives while medical students remained suspended in training. “That gives you this constant pressure of comparison. This feeling of not being where you’re supposed to be.”
Graduation, he explained, does not resolve that tension. It intensifies it. “You finish medicine and realize it’s still a long game. Yes, you have the title ‘Doctor,’ but you still can’t live up to the doctor name.” The prestige arrives before the security. The status before the substance. “A lot of people fall into pressure trying to live a life they’re actually not living because of the status.”
The emotional consequences are predictable and brutal. “Psychologically, you feel like a loser. You feel like maybe this wasn’t the right career path. You get depressed.” The rewards doctors were trained to expect, he noted, often only arrive when they are in their forties or fifties, if at all. No one prepares young doctors for that delay. No one warns them that the promise was never immediate.
That personal disillusionment sits inside a much darker professional reality. Doctors are now among the professions with the highest suicide rates globally. From inside the system, Dr Mwendwa said this is not surprising. “Medicine is very demanding psychologically, intellectually, emotionally. You need a lot of resilience to go through it.” But resilience, in medical culture, often means silence.
“A doctor can’t cry for help,” he said. “It shows weakness. The culture is ‘Only the strong survive’. If you’re not coping, nobody tells you it’s okay. You’re just told this isn’t for you.”
Layered onto that is what Dr Mwendwa calls moral injury. The trauma of knowing exactly what needs to be done to save a life and being unable to do it because the system will not allow it. “Moral injury is when you know you can save a life, but the infrastructure isn’t there. And you lose that life knowing it shouldn’t have been lost.” In under-resourced systems, this happens repeatedly. And there is no pause to process it.
“You lose someone in resuscitation,” he said, “and a few minutes later you’re still on shift. Nobody tells you to go home. You just keep going.” Over time, that accumulation becomes devastating. “Moral injury and burnout are the things that lead to a lot of suicide. It gives us PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder].”
Many doctors enter the profession already carrying unresolved trauma. Medicine does not absorb that pain. It amplifies it. “Before people become doctors, especially millennials, you can imagine all the baggage they’re carrying. Then we add occupational PTSD on top of that.” The result, he said, is a system that breaks people quietly.
Even the image of senior doctors, once held up as proof that endurance pays off, now looks different to him. “When I see the seniors with the big cars now, I look at it differently. I’m like, this guy is working his ass off.” The wealth is real, but so are the sacrifices. Missed families. Abandoned hobbies. Lives structured entirely around earning. “It’s a rat race,” he said, even at the top.
What makes this especially cruel is how little of this truth is shared with the next generation. “High school students are given these glamorous pictures of doctors,” he said, “but you don’t know the shit I’ve gone through.” Unemployment among specialists is rising. Jobs are harder to find than they were even a decade ago. The profession has changed, but the mythology has not.
For Dr Mwendwa, survival has meant reclaiming parts of himself medicine tried to erase. Creativity. Art. Identity beyond the title. “The title ‘Doctor’ doesn’t define who I am as an individual,” he said. “As soon as you dissociate yourself from the profession and realize you have more to offer the world, it’s very liberating.”
Dr Mwendwa’s story is not exceptional. It is emblematic. A life built exactly according to the rules, arriving at a destination that no longer resembles the promise. And in that gap between expectation and reality sits a grief many millennials carry silently. Not just the grief of personal disappointment, but the grief of having believed so deeply in a system that could not, or would not, keep its word.
The fact that you now have little to no hope of a job that can sustain the standard of living you grew up with unless you have, at minimum, a master’s degree, is truly wild. We were told education was the key. That promise has evaporated. We all know someone with an expensive foreign degree who has been forced into work completely unrelated to what they studied simply to survive. And beyond them are the thousands of graduates who enter the job market every year with no realistic hope of employment at all. The ladder we were told to climb is not just broken. In many cases, it was quietly removed.
Somewhere between our adolescence and our middle age, the world quietly shifted beneath our feet. The bureaucratic state hollowed out. Jobs became scarce, then precarious, then mythical. Credentials inflated and devalued simultaneously. The promise of upward mobility slowed to a crawl. The economy informalized, digitized, fragmented. Power stopped living in institutions and started living in networks. And many millennials were left stranded.
Those of us trained to follow rules found ourselves trapped in systems that no longer played by them. We waited for promotions that never came. We obeyed procedures that only slowed us down. We trusted institutions that could not protect us. We did everything by the book, only to discover the book had been quietly rewritten. Meanwhile, others thrived. Not because they were smarter. Not because they were more deserving. But because they were more adaptable.
Those who had never been fully absorbed into the formal system had learned something else entirely. That rules are negotiable. That authority is inconsistent. That survival depends on improvisation, hustle, relationships, speed. That outcomes matter more than process. In a world that rewards agility over correctness, they flourished. We stalled.
In Kenya today, following the rules is not just unrewarded. It is often actively frowned upon. It signals naivety. A lack of street intelligence. An inability to read power dynamics. The person who insists on doing things “the right way” is quietly pitied, sometimes mocked. Why are you still queuing when everyone else is calling someone? Why are you still waiting for approval when everyone else is moving? This is not moral decay. It is structural misalignment.
When rules are selectively enforced, when corruption is normalized, when institutions are slow and captured, strict compliance feels less like integrity and more like self-sabotage. The real operating system is informal. Relationships over paperwork. Timing over correctness. Narrative over credentials. For millennials trained to believe that rules equal safety, this creates a profound psychological rupture. We experience it as rage, turned inward. As shame. As paralysis. As burnout. As a sense that we are falling behind in a race we didn’t know had changed lanes. And because our identity was built on being “the good ones”, breaking rules feels like self-betrayal. So we freeze.
There is a particular grief that haunts this generation. It sounds like this: I kept my side of the bargain. Why didn’t the system keep theirs? We don’t talk about this grief enough. Instead, it leaks out sideways. Into cynical political commentary that goes nowhere. Into fixation on state power long after it has ceased to be the primary engine of opportunity. Into endless buzzwords about reform and accountability that mask a deeper despair. It leaks into our relationships. Into marriages that buckle under economic pressure and unprocessed resentment. Into intimacy that feels transactional and brittle. Into friendships strained by comparison and quiet competition. It leaks into addictions. Into numbing. Into scrolling. Into echo chambers that promise simple answers for complex pain. Into spiritual disillusionment, not always because faith failed us, but because institutions did. We were promised meaning through progress. When progress stalled, meaning collapsed with it.
Millennials are often described as politically aware. And we are. But awareness is not the same as agency. Many of us learned the language of politics without ever learning the language of power. We can name the problems fluently. Corruption. Inequality. Bad governance. We can diagnose the system endlessly. What we struggle with is action that feels effective. So we circle the same conversations, the same outrage, the same despair. We inherit the cynicism of older generations without the illusion that time will fix things. We pass down anxiety to younger generations disguised as realism. Be careful. Don’t hope too much. Don’t trust institutions. Don’t expect change. It’s not that we don’t care. It’s that caring has become exhausting.
There is also an unresolved political reckoning that sits just beneath all of this, one that many millennials have never fully articulated. We came of age during a period when the language of reform was everywhere. We were told institutions would be fixed, corruption confronted, merit restored. We were encouraged to believe that the state could be rehabilitated, that participation and vigilance would eventually bend it toward fairness. Many of us invested our hope there, because it was familiar territory. We knew how to engage institutions. We knew how to lobby, critique, analyse, vote, protest respectfully. What we were less prepared for was the slow realization that the state was not simply failing. It was no longer central. Power had migrated elsewhere, into markets, platforms, private networks, and informal arrangements that did not respond to the old tools of civic engagement. And yet many millennials remained fixated on the state, returning again and again to the same arguments, the same demands, the same disappointments, long after it became clear that this arena could no longer carry the weight of our aspirations.
This fixation is not foolish. It is understandable. We were trained to believe legitimacy flows from institutions, that change comes through formal channels, that authority can be reasoned with if you speak its language well enough. Letting go of that belief feels like letting go of adulthood itself. But the cost of clinging to it has been stagnation. While younger generations experiment more freely with alternative forms of power, influence, and survival, many millennials remain caught in a loop of critique without movement, outrage without leverage. We know what is wrong. We are less sure where to go next.
This tension becomes sharper when you look at the generational fault lines now running through society. Millennials sit in an uncomfortable middle position, squeezed between older generations who still believe, however selectively, in institutional authority, and younger ones who have little patience for it at all. To those older than us, we are insufficiently respectful, too sceptical, too demanding. To those younger, we often appear cautious, risk-averse, overly invested in systems that have already failed. We are accused, sometimes fairly, of warning against risks we ourselves were too afraid to take, of preaching realism that sounds suspiciously like fear.
This creates resentment in both directions. We resent being blamed for problems we did not create, while also being told we did not do enough to stop them. We resent watching younger people move faster, break rules more easily, build identities and incomes in ways that feel both thrilling and terrifying. Beneath that resentment is envy, not because they have it easier, but because they seem less burdened by the need for permission. They were not promised stability in the same way. They were not trained to expect fairness. As a result, they grieve less when systems fail. They pivot faster.
At the same time, many millennials feel quietly misunderstood by those who come after us. Our caution is read as cowardice rather than the residue of disappointment. Our hesitation is framed as lack of imagination rather than the aftershock of having believed too deeply, too earnestly, in a future that did not arrive. We are often asked why we are so tired, without anyone asking what we have been carrying.
There is another layer to this story that we cannot ignore. Economic dislocation hits men and women differently. For many millennial men, especially those raised with clear expectations of provision and status, the collapse of predictable pathways has been devastating. Underemployment becomes a blow to identity. Shame festers. Some retreat. Some lash out. Some find refuge in online communities that offer belonging through grievance. For women, the picture is no less complex. We were told to lean in, to have it all, to be everything at once. Careers stalled. Biological clocks did not. Support systems frayed. The emotional labour multiplied. Many are carrying households, relationships, parents, and children on unstable incomes while being told to be grateful. Everyone is tired. But not everyone is allowed to say it.
All of this brings us back, inevitably, to the personal. Structural analysis can only take you so far. At some point, each millennial has to contend with their own reckoning, their own inventory of belief and disillusionment. The question is no longer simply what went wrong, but how to live honestly now that we know. How to build lives that are responsive rather than resentful. How to find dignity outside scripts that no longer apply. How to loosen our grip on approval without losing our sense of right and wrong.
This is where the work becomes quieter and more intimate. It shows up in the decision to stop waiting for permission that will never come. In the willingness to take risks that do not come with guarantees. In redefining success in ways that make room for sanity, connection, and meaning, not just survival. It shows up in choosing relationships that are mutual rather than extractive, in refusing to perform resilience while quietly unravelling. It shows up in learning to rest without guilt, to want without apology, to change one’s mind without shame.
None of this is neat. There are no clean transitions from who we were trained to be into who we must become. There is only experimentation, failure, recalibration. There is grief that does not resolve cleanly, and anger that must be metabolized rather than acted out. There is the slow, unglamorous process of building a life that makes sense in the world as it is, not the one we were promised.
This is the sentence that unlocks everything. Millennials were optimized for a world that no longer exists. We were trained for stability in an era of volatility. For bureaucracy in an era of networks. For compliance in an era that rewards audacity. For patience in a moment that prizes speed. That mismatch is not a personal failure. It is a historical one. And it explains why so many of us feel unmoored, late, behind, confused, angry, grieving something we cannot quite name.
Naming the problem is not the same as solving it. But it is the beginning of honesty. The work ahead for millennials is not just economic. It is psychological and moral. We have to grieve the bargain that failed us without letting that grief calcify into bitterness. We have to unlearn obedience without losing integrity. We have to develop adaptive intelligence without becoming cynical opportunists. We have to redefine success outside institutions that no longer function.
It also requires solidarity, not competition. A willingness to talk honestly about where we are, not where we thought we would be. A refusal to romanticize struggle or pretend resilience is painless. The future will not be handed to us by the state. That era is over. But that does not mean there is no future. It means we have to build it differently. And perhaps that, finally, is the work we were meant to do all along.
