The global market for mobile home site setup and tie-down services is estimated at $1.2 billion for 2024, driven primarily by the demand for affordable housing. The market is projected to grow at a 3.5% CAGR over the next three years, closely tracking new manufactured housing shipments. The single greatest challenge is the persistent shortage of skilled, licensed, and insured labor, which constrains capacity and drives up service costs, posing a significant risk to project timelines and budgets.
The global Total Addressable Market (TAM) for this service is niche and directly correlated with manufactured housing placements. The United States represents over 85% of the global market, followed by Canada and Australia. Growth is sustained by the affordability gap in traditional housing and increasing acceptance of modern manufactured homes. Slower growth compared to the overall construction sector is expected due to the specialized, low-tech nature of the work.
| Year | Global TAM (est. USD) | CAGR (YoY) |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $1.20 Billion | - |
| 2025 | $1.24 Billion | 3.3% |
| 2026 | $1.29 Billion | 4.0% |
The three largest geographic markets are: 1. United States (Southeast and Southwest regions) 2. Canada (Western provinces) 3. Australia (Regional and coastal communities)
The market is characterized by a hyper-local and fragmented supplier base with low barriers to entry from a capital perspective, but high barriers related to licensing, insurance, and reputation.
⮕ Tier 1 Leaders * Clayton Home Building Group (through its installation network): Vertically integrated; offers installation as part of a turnkey home-buying process, ensuring consistent volume and process control. * Cavco Industries Inc. (and subsidiaries): Similar to Clayton, leverages its manufacturing and retail footprint to provide or subcontract installation services, offering a one-stop-shop solution. * Legacy Housing Corporation: Focuses on providing a complete package from factory to foundation, often utilizing a network of dedicated independent installers.
⮕ Emerging/Niche Players * Regional Installation Specialists: Companies like CIS (Constructive Installation Services) in the Southeast US focus exclusively on B2B installation for manufacturers and community owners. * Manufactured Home Community Operators (REITs): Large operators like Sun Communities and Equity LifeStyle Properties are increasingly insourcing or using preferred large-scale contractors to control quality and cost for new placements within their communities. * Technology-Enabled Brokers: Emerging platforms that connect certified installers with manufacturers and homeowners, aiming to improve scheduling and price transparency.
The pricing model is typically a Fixed-Fee-per-Unit quote, based on home size (single, double, triple-wide) and foundation type (e.g., slab, runners, basement). The price build-up consists of Labor (45-55%), Materials (20-25%), Equipment (10%), and Overhead & Margin (15-20%). Site-specific factors like soil condition, accessibility, and local permit fees can add significant variability.
The most volatile cost elements are labor, steel, and concrete. Recent changes include: 1. Skilled Labor: Wages for certified installers have increased by an est. 6-8% in the last 12 months due to persistent shortages. 2. Steel Components: Prices for steel anchors and tie-down straps, while down from 2022 peaks, remain volatile, with fluctuations of +/- 20% over the past 18 months based on raw material costs. 3. Concrete: Ready-mix concrete prices have seen a steady increase of est. 5-7% year-over-year, driven by cement and transportation costs [Source - Portland Cement Association, Feb 2024].
| Supplier | Region(s) | Est. Market Share | Stock Ticker | Notable Capability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton Installation | North America | est. 15-20% | BRK.B | Unmatched vertical integration with manufacturing and retail. |
| Cavco Industries | North America | est. 10-15% | CVCO | Strong network of independent and in-house installers. |
| Legacy Housing | US (South) | est. 5-7% | LEGH | Turnkey solutions focused on the affordable housing segment. |
| Sun Communities | North America | N/A (Buyer) | SUI | Significant buying power and insourcing for its own communities. |
| CIS | US (Southeast) | est. <2% | Private | B2B focus; specialized expertise in high-volume community setups. |
| Local Contractors | Hyper-Local | est. 50-60% | Private | Highly fragmented; relationship and reputation-based business. |
North Carolina is a top-five US market for manufactured housing, with over 7,000 new homes shipped annually. Demand is robust, driven by population growth in the Research Triangle and Charlotte metro areas, coupled with housing affordability challenges. The state has a mature supplier ecosystem, including several manufacturing plants (e.g., Clayton, Oakwood Homes) and a deep network of local and regional installers. The North Carolina Department of Insurance (NCDOI) strictly regulates the industry, requiring installers to be licensed and to pass inspections. Labor availability remains the primary constraint, particularly for licensed crews capable of handling large community projects. The state's favorable business climate is offset by the administrative burden of its robust regulatory and inspection regime.
| Risk Category | Grade | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Supply Risk | Medium | The number of suppliers is high, but the number of qualified, licensed, and insured suppliers is limited, creating capacity bottlenecks. |
| Price Volatility | Medium | Directly exposed to volatile labor, steel, and fuel costs. Fixed-fee models carry risk for suppliers, who price it into quotes. |
| ESG Scrutiny | Low | Primary focus is on worker safety (OSHA compliance). Low public or investor scrutiny on environmental or social factors. |
| Geopolitical Risk | Low | A hyper-local service with a domestic supply chain for most materials. Not exposed to international trade disputes. |
| Technology Obsolescence | Low | Core installation methods are well-established and manual. Innovation is incremental (materials, tools) rather than disruptive. |