background

Arbitration

The RLA provides for both grievance and interest arbitration. Access to grievance arbitration, involving the interpretation or application of an existing collective bargaining agreement, is mandatory under the RLA. The Board has significant administrative responsibilities for the three sources of grievance arbitration in the railroad industry. These sources are the National Railroad Adjustment Board established under the RLA, as well as the arbitration panels established directly by the labor-management parties at each railroad (Public Law Boards and Special Boards of Adjustment). Grievance arbitration in the airline industry is accomplished at the various System Boards of Adjustment created jointly by labor and management at the parties’ expense. The Board furnishes panels of prospective arbitrators for the parties’ selection in both the airline and railroad industries. The NMB has substantial financial responsibilities for railroad arbitration proceedings in that it pays the fees and travel expenses of the arbitrators. Arbitration decisions under the RLA are final and binding with very limited grounds for judicial review.

Arbitration Overview

Interest arbitration is a process used to establish the terms of a new or modified collective bargaining agreement through arbitration, rather than through negotiations. Although the RLA provides an effective process for interest arbitration, its use is not statutorily required. The NMB offers the parties the opportunity to use interest arbitration when the Board has determined that further mediation efforts will be unsuccessful. In addition, the parties may directly agree to resolve their collective bargaining dispute or portions of their dispute through interest arbitration. The NMB generally provides the parties with panels of potential arbitrators from which they select the individual to resolve the dispute. In some instances, the parties’ agreement to arbitrate allows the NMB to directly appoint an arbitrator. The interest arbitration decision is final and binding with very narrow grounds for a judicial appeal.

When requested, the NMB will provide the parties with panels of potential arbitrators from which they select an individual to resolve their dispute. However, in most instances, the parties agree to allow the NMB to directly appoint an arbitrator. Interest Arbitration decisions are final and binding with very narrow grounds for judicial appeal.


Arbitration Highlights

The Office of Arbitration Services directed its attention to promoting a more efficient Section 3 process, thereby fostering faster resolution of minor disputes (grievances). The NMB made a well-received move in this regard during FY 2015 by targeting the backlog of grievance arbitration cases for resolution and increasing the number of arbitrators available to hear and decide cases and introducing more technology to the administrative processing of cases with its arbitrators. The estimated 6,247 cases pending at the end of FY 2015 is 1,114 more than cases pending at the end of FY 2014. The increase is attributed to the concluded national round of bargaining among the Class I freight railroads which has caused the filing of more grievances concerning the applicability of certain provisions of the agreement.

The NMB Arbitration program continued its efforts to modernize the processing of minor disputes. The agency improved its already successful program of using the NMB website as a source for many of the forms and documents needed by arbitrators and the parties with the improvement of the Arbitrators’ Caseload Report and the introduction of the new Waiting List Report on the NMB website.

During FY 2015, the NMB revised the Arbitrators Workspace, which has been in operation for several years. The Arbitrators Workspace is a web based information system which gives arbitrators online access to their case information. This system is used by the arbitrators to request work and submit requests for compensation for work. The Arbitrators Workspace replaced numerous hard-copy forms.

The revised Arbitrators’ Workspace now closes cases quicker and shortens the time for the adding of cases. The level of grievance activity handled through the NMB Arbitration program maintained the same level when compared to the activity in FY 2014. During FY 2015, the parties brought an estimated 3,816 cases to arbitration compared to 4,313 cases in FY 2014. In FY 2015, an estimated 2,702 cases were closed compared to 2,946 in FY 2014, leaving 6,247 cases pending at the end of FY 2015.

On several occasions during the fiscal year, the Agency met with representatives from the labor organizations and carriers to review its caseload. Carriers included Canadian National Railroad, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Kansas City Southern Railway, and CSX Transportation. The NMB also met with carriers engaged in the transportation of passengers such as Amtrak, Metro North Railroad, SEPTA, New Jersey Transit, and Metra. The Office of Arbitration Services met with all of the labor organizations representing employees in the railroad industry. NMB efforts have been directed to facilitating a more efficient Section 3 process under the RLA, thereby reducing the backlog and furthering the RLA objective of prompt resolution of minor disputes.

The NMB continued its efforts designed to improve the arbitration of grievances under Section III of the Railway Labor Act. The Board had five ambitious goals for this transformation: (1) to ensure that the parties receive timely and outstanding arbitration services from the Board’s staff and its contract arbitrators; (2) to ensure that the Board uses e-business capabilities to the maximum extent possible; (3) to ensure that Board procedures are improved through a process involving public input; (4) to ensure that arbitrators schedule, hear, and decide cases in a timely manner; and (5) to ensure that NMB resources are used wisely and in accordance with Federal regulations and sound accounting practices.


Annual Case Audit

In June 2015, the NMB conducted an intensive audit of all pending cases before Public Law boards and Special Boards of Adjustment. The Agency provided the Class-I freight railroads, commuter railroads, regional railroads and all labor organizations representing railroad employees with a list of cases pending on these boards. The feedback from the audit enhanced the accuracy of the NMB case management system.


Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Railroad Industry

The NMB actively promoted grievance mediation as an alternative means of dealing with grievances in the railroad industry by reaching out to the largest Class-I freight carriers and labor organizations. During FY 2015, Arbitration Services made presentations at a meeting of Class-I freight railroads and labor organizations. The NMB anticipates continuing this initiative during FY 2016. The NMB had several grievance mediation cases with carriers in the railroad industry during 2015.


Arbitrator Productivity

The NMB continued its efforts to increase arbitrator productivity as a result of strict adherence to the three month rule. Arbitrators who have not issued a decision within three months of a hearing are contacted monthly and encouraged to issue those decisions.

The Agency improved its already successful program of using the NMB website as a source for many of the forms and documents needed by arbitrators and the parties. The NMB used the website to keep the parties and the public informed regarding Section III activities. Arbitrators, parties, and the public use the website to obtain information and forms instantaneously. In FY 2015, the agency posted an improved Arbitrators Caseload Report on the NMB website. The report shows by arbitrator, grievance cases of railroad employees the parties have chosen to pursue. It also indicates whether a case is late (i.e., a decision has not been rendered within 3 months of when a case was heard by the arbitrator). The Arbitrator Caseload Report is real-time in that it has a direct link to an NMB database reflecting updates as they are made by Arbitration Services staff. The availability of information on the website reduces the staff time which ordinarily would be required to respond to questions and requests. The NMB has also placed an NMB National Railroad Adjustment Board Open Case Report on the website. This report lists all of the open cases at the NRAB. With this report and the Arbitrators Caseload Report, the NMB’s entire Section 3 caseload is on the NMB website (www.nmb.gov).


Conversion To A Pay-Per-Case Compensation

During this fiscal year the NMB changed its compensation and began paying the arbitrators on a per-case basis, instead of the normal per-day compensation.


Knowledge Store

The NMB further expanded its use of technology at the NRAB. All NRAB awards are entered into the Knowledge Store at the same time that they are distributed to the parties. Parties have been trained to enter awards into the Knowledge Store. In some instances, valid awards are entered within 24 hours of completion.


Arbitration Info Series

During FY 2015, the Office of Arbitration Services commenced a new info series on Arbitration and Section 3 topics. Using the NMB’s Lyceum, the NMB posted several information film segments on various topics and issues in arbitration under the Railway Labor Act.

In August, the NMB created an information segment entitled “Hearing Expectations of Arbitrators” using several well-known railroad arbitrators. The NMB also created an information segment titled “How Arbitrators are Selected by the Parties” using several rail management and labor officials. The NMB conducted a survey to determine future topics for segments which will be filmed in FY 2016.


Arbitration Cases*

Start Pending

FY15
5133
FY14
3577
FY11 – FY15 AVG
3189.6

New

FY15
3816
FY14
4313
FY11 – FY15 AVG
4436.4

Sum

FY15
8949
FY14
7890
FY11 – FY15 AVG
7626

Closed

FY15
2702
FY14
2946
FY11 – FY15 AVG
3628.6

End-Pending

FY15
6247
FY14
4944
FY11 – FY15 AVG
3997.4

*
The Office of Arbitration Services conducted an audit in Fiscal Year 2015. The audit revealed an error in the old system which resulted in incorrect case numbers