Printable version of this page
Newcomer students are youngsters who arrive in school without knowing English. When they are placed in classrooms where the language of instruction is English, it is a challenge for both newcomer students, their classmates, and their teachers. Teachers want newcomer students to develop English and to take advantage of available supports, but they also want them to learn. They are frustrated when they see that newcomer students cannot follow instructions or explanations, and they worry that they will inevitably fall behind.
In an effort to involve and include newcomers, teachers often enlist the help of other students who speak the newcomer’s language. These children are proud of their bilingual skills and eager to help. Unfortunately, without guidance, these eager young translators can sometimes create unexpected dependencies in the newcomer children they are eager to help.
A Language Buddies Program is designed to guide bilingual students in supporting their newcomer peers. It can take a number of forms but essentially it includes the following features:
There are a few key ideas about language development that language buddies need to understand.
Ideas about Receptive Capacities
In order to learn, the most important capacity newcomers need to develop is comprehension. They must first understand the teacher. They need to keep listening even when they get tired. At first it will be hard, but the more they keep listening and trying to understand, the more they will develop their receptive abilities.
Language buddies will not help this process if they translate everything for the newcomer.
Instead, what language buddies need to do is to:
Ideas about Productive Capacities
Newcomers will develop productive capacities by being included in interactions.
Inclusion is key, that is, talking to newcomers with the expectation that if they keep engaged and listen, they will be able to imitate the language that they hear.
Language buddies can help productive abilities grow if:
Preformulated utterances: Yes that’s it. I don’t know. Cool! Bummer!
Phrases to keep communication going: Could you say that again?
Choice questions: Do you think this is hard or soft?
Yes-no questions: Are you finished with the ruler?
Questions grounded in concrete objects they’re investigating: Do you want to test it with the magnet (pointing to magnet)?
Providing models of appropriate responses with explanation in the home language as needed: If you agree (si estás de acuerdo) say: “Yes that’s right. I agree.”
In the context of NGSS science classrooms, language buddies can support students’s work in triads. An ideal triad for a newcomer would include: the newcomer, a language buddy, and a talkative, competent speaker of English. In the science classroom, the process of language learning is seen as developing the ability to use the target language to participate meaningfully and purposefully in particular activities and contexts (Cook, 2002), such as using science practices to participate in inquiry and sense-making. The SISL approach understands language development from a participation metaphor, in which success means becoming a member of a community of practice (Larsen-Freeman, 2002)—in this case, a classroom community engaging together in investigating and understanding scientific phenomena. In order to support their participation, learners make use of affordances in their environment. Van Lier (2004) defines an affordance as “a relationship between an organism (a learner, in our case) and the environment, that signals an opportunity for on inhibition of action” (p. 4). Learners assert agency in perceiving and taking up affordances as they act and participate in their environment.
In the case of newcomers, the role of language buddies in science classrooms (guided by the teacher’s understanding of how opportunities for language development can be used) is to serve as “good buddies,” that is, friends to support learners in taking up these affordances: listening (past fatigue), observing, imitating, engaging, and using less than perfect language to express ideas. In doing so, it is important that language buddies do not “help” in ways that undermine newcomer students’ agency or show a lack of respect or appreciation for their intellectual capacity. Often, well-intentioned peers “help” in ways that are ultimately undermining, such as telling newcomers to copy their work to make sure it is “correct” or giving newcomers specific tasks in a group activity without having engaged them in the intellectual work of the task (e.g., telling them to draw a part of the model without engaging them in making sense of the phenomenon they’re modeling).
As teachers, there are important moves we can make to interrupt these types of unproductive “helping” behaviors:
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33-46). Continuum.
Cook, V. (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers.