
In a statement released on Tuesday, the Governor’s Office admitted responsibility, describing the incident as an unintended mistake that occurred amid intense logistical preparations for the well-attended peace event.
“It has come to our attention that the South Sudanese flag was inadvertently displayed upside down during the event,” the Governor’s Office said, adding that it “deeply regrets this oversight and extends sincere apologies to the citizens of Jonglei State and the nation at large.”
According to the statement, the rally was organised to strengthen unity, healing, and reconciliation among communities in Jonglei, and state officials were primarily concentrated on ensuring the success of the peace initiative. The office stressed that the incorrect arrangement of the flag was purely accidental and should not be interpreted as a deliberate act or sign of disrespect toward the country or its symbols.
“We reaffirm our unwavering respect for the symbols of our nation and remain committed to upholding the dignity and pride they represent,” the statement continued. The Governor’s Office further thanked the public for its understanding and assured citizens that promoting peace and progress remains a top priority for Governor Dr Riek Gai Kok and his administration.
The clarification followed a growing online discussion after photos from the event circulated widely on social media, drawing attention to the mishandling of the national flag and sparking public criticism.
Many users questioned how such an error could occur at an official state event, while others called for accountability and greater caution when handling national symbols.
The matter took a sharper turn when former Minister of General Education and Instruction, Gordon Koang Bar, issued a legal commentary on Monday describing the incident as “a matter of significant legal and constitutional concern.”
He argued that displaying the national flag upside down—especially by a sitting governor—could easily be interpreted in several serious ways, including as a distress signal, a potential sign of disrespect for the nation, or symbolic conduct inconsistent with constitutional obligations requiring loyalty and respect for state authority.
While the Governor’s Office has now categorically apologised, the incident has reignited public debate over the correct use of national symbols and the responsibility of state officials to safeguard them, particularly during high-profile events intended to promote peace and unity.