The decision, confirmed on Wednesday, comes at a moment when the world body is under pressure to respond to some of the most polarising issues in global politics under the theme ‘Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development and human rights’.
South Sudan’s choice of delegation head is notable, not least because it follows the country’s recent abstention on a symbolic but highly charged UN vote recognising Palestinian statehood.
The country’s non-alignment policy and a need to maintain balanced relations, particularly with Israel, were seen as key reasons for its position. The move underscored South Sudan’s careful diplomacy—an effort to avoid taking sides in conflicts that risk straining its fragile international ties.
This year’s General Assembly convenes against a backdrop of intensifying crises. The war in Gaza, now in its second year of devastating escalation, continues to divide the international community.
Calls for a permanent ceasefire and humanitarian corridors are set to dominate speeches from world leaders, even as disagreements over accountability and recognition of Palestinian rights remain unresolved.
At the same time, the UN itself is grappling with shrinking resources. Major powers, particularly the United States, have increasingly withheld or delayed funding, citing political disagreements and frustrations over the body’s perceived inefficiencies. These cuts threaten not only humanitarian operations but also peacekeeping missions—programs on which countries like South Sudan heavily rely.
For South Sudan, participation in the Assembly is more than symbolic. It offers a platform to reaffirm its relevance on the global stage and to remind donors and partners of its pressing needs.
The world’s youngest nation continues to face humanitarian crises at home, compounded by conflict, displacement, and climate shocks such as flooding. Diplomatic engagement at the UN remains one of the few avenues to secure international solidarity and aid.
