Assessing Cost and Effort in Adding Insulation

Assessing Cost and Effort in Adding Insulation

Common Causes of Excessive Noise in Garage Doors

When considering the addition of insulation to garage doors, understanding the types of insulation materials available is crucial for assessing both cost and effort. The decision to insulate a garage door often stems from a desire to improve energy efficiency, reduce noise, or enhance comfort within an attached living space. Therefore, selecting the appropriate material involves balancing budget constraints with the desired level of thermal resistance and ease of installation.


One common option is fiberglass batt insulation. Decorative hardware can add character to a plain garage door design garage door repair companies near me real property. This material is known for its affordability and decent insulating properties. It consists of fine glass fibers woven together, which trap air and slow heat transfer. For those on a tight budget, fiberglass can be an attractive choice. However, installing fiberglass batts can be labor-intensive as it requires cutting the material to fit snugly between the panels of a garage door. Additionally, proper protective gear must be worn during installation to avoid irritation from glass fibers.


Reflective foil insulation is another popular choice due to its lightweight nature and ease of installation. It works by reflecting radiant heat away from the garage, making it particularly effective in hot climates. This type of insulation usually comes in rolls or sheets that can be cut to size and adhered directly onto the door's surface with minimal tools required. While reflective foil may not offer as high an R-value (a measure of thermal resistance) as other materials like foam boards, its simplicity makes it suitable for DIY enthusiasts looking for quick solutions.


Foam board insulation provides a middle ground between performance and ease of use. Materials such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) or extruded polystyrene (XPS) offer higher R-values per inch compared to fiberglass or foil options. Foam boards are relatively easy to handle; they can be cut precisely with a utility knife and secured using adhesive or fasteners designed for foam products. The added benefit is their rigid structure, which also enhances soundproofing qualities-a bonus for garages doubling as workshops or recreational spaces.


Spray foam insulation represents a more advanced solution but requires professional application unless one has experience with spray systems. This material excels in filling gaps and creating airtight seals, offering superior energy efficiency benefits over other options. However, spray foam's cost is significantly higher due to both material expenses and necessary equipment or professional fees.


Ultimately, when assessing cost and effort in adding insulation to garage doors, homeowners must weigh their priorities-whether it's minimizing upfront costs with options like fiberglass batts or investing in long-term energy savings through high-performance solutions like spray foam. Each type presents unique advantages and challenges; thus careful consideration aligned with specific needs will guide optimal decision-making for enhancing garage environments effectively.

When considering the addition of insulation to a building, assessing both the cost and effort involved is crucial for making an informed decision. Various factors influence the cost of insulation, each contributing uniquely to the overall expenditure and complexity of the project. Understanding these factors can facilitate better budgeting, planning, and execution.


One primary factor affecting insulation costs is the type of insulation material chosen. Different materials come with varying price tags due to differences in production costs, thermal efficiency, and ease of installation. For instance, fiberglass batt insulation is generally more affordable than spray foam insulation but might not offer the same level of energy efficiency or moisture resistance. Homeowners must weigh the benefits against their budget constraints when selecting a material.


The size and layout of the area requiring insulation also play a significant role in determining costs. Larger spaces will naturally require more materials, increasing expenses proportionately. Additionally, irregularly shaped areas or spaces with numerous obstacles may necessitate custom solutions or additional labor, further driving up costs. The accessibility of the space can similarly affect pricing-insulating an attic with cramped access points will be more labor-intensive than insulating a straightforward wall cavity.


Labor costs are another significant consideration. Professional installation ensures that insulation performs optimally but comes at a price that varies based on geographic location and market demand for skilled workers. In some regions, labor shortages can lead to higher wages and longer wait times for service availability.


Energy efficiency goals also impact decisions related to cost and effort in adding insulation. Higher initial investments in premium materials or comprehensive coverage might offer better long-term savings through reduced energy bills. However, this approach requires careful calculation to ensure that potential savings justify upfront expenditures.


Building codes and regulations may impose additional requirements that influence both cost and effort. Adhering to local guidelines often necessitates specific types or levels of insulation which can alter project scope and budget unexpectedly if not anticipated early on.


Lastly, timing can affect both cost and effort involved in adding insulation. Seasonal demand fluctuations may result in varying material prices or delays due to contractor availability during peak periods such as winter preparation months.


In conclusion, while adding insulation involves several interconnected factors influencing its cost-from material selection to labor considerations-thorough assessment helps manage these challenges efficiently. By carefully evaluating each element within their context-alongside understanding personal objectives like enhanced comfort or energy savings-homeowners can achieve optimal results tailored specifically towards their needs without unnecessary expenditure or wasted effort.

Understanding the role of quiet rollers in minimizing garage door noise

Understanding the role of quiet rollers in minimizing garage door noise is essential for both homeowners and businesses seeking to enhance their environments' comfort and functionality.. Garage doors, being one of the largest moving components in a building, can contribute significantly to noise pollution if not properly maintained or equipped with suitable hardware.

Understanding the role of quiet rollers in minimizing garage door noise

Posted by on 2025-01-01

The impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs

When considering the impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs, homeowners and builders alike are increasingly recognizing the value these doors bring to modern living spaces.. Insulated doors serve as a critical component in enhancing a home's thermal envelope, directly contributing to reduced energy consumption and lowered utility bills.

The impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Repair tips for maintaining the effectiveness of noise reduction materials

When it comes to maintaining the effectiveness of noise reduction materials, there's a fine line between ensuring optimal performance and inadvertently diminishing their soundproofing capabilities.. Noise reduction materials, often used in homes, vehicles, and commercial spaces, are essential for creating calm and quiet environments.

Repair tips for maintaining the effectiveness of noise reduction materials

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Identifying Mechanical Components Contributing to Noise

Estimating labor and time requirements for the installation of insulation is a critical component in assessing the overall cost and effort involved in such projects. This process not only influences budgeting but also impacts project scheduling and resource allocation, making it an essential task for homeowners, contractors, and businesses alike.


Firstly, understanding the scope of the project is paramount. The size of the area requiring insulation directly affects both labor and time estimates. For instance, insulating a small attic will demand far less time and manpower compared to a multi-story commercial building. Therefore, accurate measurements and assessments of the space are crucial starting points. Advanced tools like infrared cameras can aid in identifying areas with poor insulation or thermal leaks, ensuring that no spot is overlooked.


Once the area has been assessed, selecting the right type of insulation becomes the next focal point. Different materials have varying installation complexities; fiberglass batts might be relatively straightforward to install compared to spray foam or blown-in cellulose which require specialized equipment and expertise. Each type also comes with its unique set of handling times which must be factored into labor estimates.


The complexity of installation is another critical factor influencing estimates. Homes with unconventional designs or hard-to-reach spaces may present challenges that extend installation times significantly. Similarly, existing structures may require additional preparation work-such as removing old insulation or addressing moisture issues-that could complicate timelines further.


Labor costs are inherently tied to local market conditions as well as the skill level required for specific tasks. In regions where skilled labor is scarce or expensive, estimates will naturally skew higher. Moreover, projects demanding high precision or involving hazardous materials necessitate hiring professionals who command higher wages.


Time efficiency can be improved through strategic planning and resource management. Employing a team with clearly defined roles allows simultaneous operations-one group might prepare surfaces while another installs insulation-which optimizes workflow and minimizes downtime. Additionally, ensuring all necessary tools and materials are on-site before commencement prevents delays caused by last-minute procurements.


Finally, potential disruptions should always be accounted for in any estimate. Weather conditions can affect both exterior installations and transportation logistics while unforeseen structural issues might necessitate reevaluations midway through a project.


In conclusion, estimating labor and time requirements for installing insulation involves a multifaceted approach that considers area size, material choice, complexity of installation, local labor markets, strategic planning strategies, and potential disruptions. Accurate estimations enable efficient project execution by aligning budgetary constraints with realistic timelines thus ensuring successful outcomes without compromising quality or safety standards.

Identifying Mechanical Components Contributing to Noise

The Role of Insulation and Materials in Noise Levels

When considering the addition of insulation to a building, the primary motives often revolve around energy efficiency and comfort. However, the process is not without its potential challenges. Understanding these obstacles and their solutions is crucial in assessing both the cost and effort involved in such an undertaking.


One of the most significant challenges in adding insulation is determining the appropriate type of insulation for a specific building. Each building has unique characteristics that influence this decision, such as its age, existing materials, and climate conditions. For instance, older homes may have spaces that are difficult to access or may require special considerations due to outdated construction methods. To address this issue, it is essential to conduct a thorough assessment of the building structure and consult with professionals who can recommend suitable insulation materials that fulfill both thermal performance requirements and budget constraints.


Another challenge lies in assessing the current state of existing insulation. In many cases, buildings already have some level of insulation that may be degraded or insufficient by modern standards. Conducting an energy audit can provide valuable insights into where heat loss occurs and which areas would benefit most from additional insulating material. This diagnostic step helps prioritize efforts effectively, ensuring that investment yields maximum energy savings.


Cost considerations also play a critical role when deciding on adding insulation. While upfront costs might seem daunting, especially if extensive retrofitting is required, it's important to consider long-term benefits such as reduced energy bills and increased property value. Financial incentives like tax credits or rebates can mitigate initial expenditure; thus, researching available programs could significantly offset costs.


Additionally, labor costs are another factor demanding careful consideration. The complexity of installation varies depending on whether it's a DIY project or requires professional intervention due to factors like roof pitches or wall cavities. A realistic evaluation of one's skills versus hiring professionals ensures not only quality results but also safety during installation.


Environmental impact represents yet another dimension worth contemplating when selecting insulating materials. Some options have higher carbon footprints than others either through production processes or disposal issues at end-of-life stages-choosing eco-friendly alternatives contributes positively towards sustainability goals while enhancing indoor air quality.


Finally-and perhaps unexpectedly-homeowners might face bureaucratic hurdles including permits needed before commencing work especially in historical districts where modifications must align with preservation guidelines without compromising aesthetic integrity.


In conclusion: addressing potential challenges associated with adding insulation involves strategic evaluation across multiple fronts encompassing material selection based on structural compatibility alongside financial assessments weighing both short-term expenses against long-term gains-all within ethical boundaries embracing sustainable practices whenever possible thereby optimizing overall outcomes regarding cost-efficiency coupled seamlessly alongside enhanced living conditions ultimately underscoring why meticulous planning remains paramount throughout any successful retrofit endeavor aimed at fortifying thermal barriers within residential spaces today!

Impact of Poor Maintenance on Garage Door Sound Levels

When it comes to enhancing the energy efficiency of a home, adding insulation is often a top priority. However, homeowners are frequently faced with the decision of whether to tackle this project themselves or hire professionals for the job. Both options come with their own sets of costs and efforts, making it crucial to weigh them carefully before making a choice.


DIY installation can be an appealing option for those who enjoy hands-on projects and are looking to save money. The primary cost associated with DIY insulation is the material itself. Home improvement stores offer various types of insulation-such as fiberglass batts, spray foam, and blown-in cellulose-each varying in price depending on quality and R-value (a measure of thermal resistance). Additionally, renting or purchasing necessary tools such as blowers or protective gear adds to the initial expense but could still result in overall savings compared to hiring professionals.


However, these financial savings come with significant trade-offs in terms of effort and expertise. Installing insulation requires careful planning and execution to ensure effectiveness. This includes measuring spaces accurately, cutting materials precisely, and sealing gaps meticulously to prevent heat loss or air infiltration. For someone without prior experience, this can be time-consuming and physically demanding work that might lead to suboptimal results if not done correctly.


On the other hand, professional installation offers several advantages that might justify its higher cost. Professionals bring expertise that ensures proper installation techniques are employed-minimizing waste while maximizing efficiency. They also have access to high-grade materials and equipment that may not be readily available at consumer-level outlets. Furthermore, hiring experts usually means faster completion times since they work in teams and follow streamlined processes honed over years of practice.


The downside is obviously the increased financial burden. Labor costs account for a significant portion of professional fees; however, this can often be offset by potential energy savings achieved through optimal installation quality-leading to lower utility bills over time. Additionally, many contractors offer warranties or guarantees on their work which provide peace of mind against future issues.


Ultimately, deciding between DIY and professional insulation installation hinges on balancing immediate cost considerations against long-term benefits derived from project success rates and energy efficiency improvements. For those confident in their skills-or willing to invest considerable effort into learning-the do-it-yourself route may prove rewarding both financially and personally satisfying as a testament to self-sufficiency.


Conversely, individuals who value convenience or lack confidence in executing complex tasks might find greater assurance entrusting this undertaking into capable hands despite higher upfront expenses involved when engaging seasoned pros adept at mitigating risks associated with substandard installations leading potentially costly rectifications down line otherwise incurred should errors arise due negligence during attempts amateurishly handled inadequately prepared novices unfamiliar intricacies involved insulating effectively safeguarding homes comfort sustainability alike therein lies true essence assessing wisely best course action suited individual circumstances prevailing ultimately determining successful outcome endeavor envisaged initially embarked upon thoughtfully considered options available judiciously evaluated accordingly thereby achieving desired objectives efficiently seamlessly harmoniously integrated cohesive comprehensive approach adopted aligning aspirations realities pragmatically achievable practicalities forefront decision-making process pivotal discerning informed choices facilitating optimal resolutions favorably impactful enduring positively beneficial all concerned stakeholders engaged contextually relevant manner fulfilling expectations satisfactorily conclusively attained envisioned goals aspired originally conceptually defined strategically planned executed proficiently realized commendably within parameters established guiding principles underpinning rationale decisional framework formulated purposefully guiding deliberations undertaken responsibly prudently conclusively ultimately determining pathway most aligned preferences priorities prerequisites specified stipulations constraints imposed contingencies anticipated contingently addressed adequately competently managed assuredly competently reliably consistently throughout duration continuum spectrum initiatives contemplated conducted diligently assidu

Solutions for Reducing Excessive Noise During Installation

When considering the topic of adding insulation to a building, both long-term cost savings and energy efficiency play pivotal roles in the decision-making process. These factors not only influence the initial assessment of cost and effort but also contribute significantly to the overall sustainability and financial viability of such an initiative.


To begin with, long-term cost savings are a major motivating factor for homeowners and businesses alike when contemplating the addition of insulation. Although the upfront costs can be substantial-depending on the type and extent of insulation required-the potential for significant savings over time is undeniable. Insulation works by reducing heat loss in winter and keeping heat out in summer, thereby minimizing the need for excessive heating or cooling. This results in lower utility bills year-round, which can accumulate into considerable savings over the lifespan of a building.


Moreover, as energy prices continue to fluctuate-and often increase-the financial benefits of improved insulation become even more pronounced. By investing in high-quality insulation today, property owners are essentially hedging against future energy price hikes. The return on investment can be realized within just a few years through reduced energy expenditures alone. Additionally, many governments offer tax incentives or rebates for energy-efficient upgrades like insulation, further enhancing potential cost savings.


Energy efficiency considerations go hand in hand with these financial aspects. A well-insulated building requires less energy to maintain comfortable temperatures, which translates directly into reduced environmental impact. In today's world where climate change is a pressing concern, improving energy efficiency through better insulation is a tangible step toward reducing carbon footprints. It aligns with broader efforts to promote sustainability and responsible resource use.


Furthermore, efficient buildings tend to have higher market values due to their lower operational costs and environmentally friendly attributes-an important consideration for anyone looking at resale value down the line. Energy-efficient homes not only attract eco-conscious buyers but also stand out in competitive real estate markets.


However, assessing the cost and effort involved in adding insulation involves careful planning and consideration of several variables: existing building conditions, insulation materials available on the market, labor costs, and potential disruptions during installation. It's essential to conduct thorough research or consult professionals to determine what type of insulation best suits specific needs while balancing budgetary constraints.


In conclusion, while adding insulation may involve significant initial expenditure and effort, its long-term benefits unequivocally justify these investments. The dual advantages of substantial cost savings coupled with enhanced energy efficiency make it an appealing choice for those aiming to improve their property's economic performance as well as its ecological footprint. As society continues moving towards sustainable living practices, investing in effective insulation provides a practical means of contributing positively both financially and environmentally.

A residential garage door opener. The motor is in the box on the upper-right.

A garage door opener is a motorized device that opens and closes a garage door controlled by switches on the garage wall. Most also include a handheld radio remote control carried by the owner, which can be used to open and close the door from a short distance.

The electric opener

[edit]

The electric overhead garage door opener was invented by C.G. Johnson in 1926 in Hartford City, Indiana.[1] Electric Garage Door openers did not become popular until Era Meter Company of Chicago offered one after World War II where the overhead garage door could be opened via a key pad located on a post at the end of the driveway or a switch inside the garage.[2]

As in an elevator, the electric motor does not provide most of the power to move a heavy garage door. Instead, most of door's weight is offset by the counterbalance springs attached to the door. (Even manually operated garage doors have counterbalances; otherwise, they would be too heavy for a person to open or close them.) In a typical design, torsion springs apply torque to a shaft, and that shaft applies a force to the garage door via steel counterbalance cables. The electric opener provides only a small amount of force to control how far the door opens and closes. In most cases, the garage door opener also holds the door closed in place of a lock.

The typical electric garage door opener consists of a power unit that contains the electric motor. The power unit attaches to a track. A trolley connected to an arm that attaches to the top of the garage door slides back and forth on the track, thus opening and closing the garage door. The trolley is pulled along the track by a chain, belt, or screw that turns when the motor is operated. A quick-release mechanism is attached to the trolley to allow the garage door to be disconnected from the opener for manual operation during a power failure or in case of emergency. Limit switches on the power unit control the distance the garage door opens and closes once the motor receives a signal from the remote control or wall push button to operate the door.[3]

The entire assembly hangs above the garage door. The power unit hangs from the ceiling and is located towards the rear of the garage. The end of the track on the opposite end of the power unit attaches to a header bracket that is attached to the header wall above the garage door. The powerhead is usually supported by punched angle iron.

Recently another type of opener, known as the jackshaft opener, has become more popular.[when?] This style of opener was used frequently on commercial doors but in recent years has been adapted for residential use. This style of opener consists of a motor that attaches to the side of the torsion rod and moves the door up and down by simply spinning the rod. These openers need a few extra components to function safely for residential use. These include a cable tension monitor, to detect when a cable is broken, and a separate locking mechanism to lock the door when it is fully closed. These have the advantage that they free up ceiling space that an ordinary opener and rail would occupy. These also have the disadvantage that the door must have a torsion rod to attach the motor to.

Types

[edit]

There are six types of garage door openers:

  1. Chain drive openers. These have a chain (similar to a bicycle's) that connects the trolley to the motor.
  2. Belt drive openers use a rubber belt in place of a chain.
  3. Screw drive openers have a long screw inside the track. The trolley connects to this screw.
  4. Direct drive openers have the motor installed inside the trolley and use a gear wheel to guide the trolley along a fixed chain.
  5. Jackshaft openers mount on the wall at either end of the torsion bar.
  6. Roller openers automate roller doors, which roll upward and coil around a drum above the garage entrance, maximizing space.

These openers typically feature two tines that slide into a drum wheel within the roller door mechanism, engaging to smoothly lift or lower the door.

Remote control

[edit]

The first wireless garage door openers were invented and developed by two US inventors at the same time, one in Illinois and the other in Washington state, around 1930. They were unknown to each other.[4]

The first garage door opener remote controls were simple and consisted of a simple transmitter (the remote) and receiver which controlled the opener mechanism. The transmitter would transmit on a designated frequency; the receiver would listen for the radio signal, then open or close the garage, depending on the door position. The basic concept of this can be traced back to World War II. This type of system was used to detonate remote bombs. While novel at the time, the technology ran its course when garage door openers became popular. While the garage door remote control transmitter is low power and has limited range, its signal can be received by other, nearby, garage door openers. When two neighbors had garage door openers, then opening one garage door might open the neighbor's garage door as well.

The second stage of the wireless garage door opener system solved the opening-the-neighbor's-garage-door problem. The remote controls on these systems transmitted a digital code, and the receiver in the garage responded only to that code. The codes were typically set by eight to twelve DIP switches on the receiver and transmitter, so they allowed for 28 = 256 to 212 = 4,096 different codes. As long as neighbors used different codes, they would not open each other's garage doors. The intent of these systems was to avoid interference with nearby garage doors; the systems were not designed with security in mind. Intruders were able to defeat the security of these systems and gain entry to the garage and the house. The number of codes was small enough that even an unsophisticated intruder with a compatible remote control transmitter could just start transmitting all possible codes until he found one that opened the door. More sophisticated intruders could acquire a black box master key that automatically transmitted every possible code in a short time. An even more sophisticated method is known as a replay attack. The attacker would use a code grabber, which has a receiver that captures the remote's digital code and can retransmit that digital code at a later time. The attacker with a code grabber would wait nearby for the homeowner to use his remote, capture the code, and then replay the code to open the door when the homeowner was gone. Multicode openers became unpopular in areas where security was important, but due to their ease of programming, such openers are often used to operate such things as the gates in gated apartment complexes.

An intermediate stage of the garage door opener market eliminated the DIP switches and used remotes preprogrammed to one out of roughly 3.5 billion unique codes. The receiver would maintain a security list of remotes to which it would respond; the user could easily add the unique remote's code to the list by pressing a button on the garage door opener while activating the remote control. A large number of codes made the brute force try-all-possible-digital-codes attacks infeasible, but the systems were still vulnerable to code grabbers. For user convenience, these systems were also backward compatible with the older DIP switch remote codes, but adding an old technology remote to the security list made the garage door opener vulnerable to a brute force attack to find the DIP switch code. The larger code space approach was an improvement over the fixed DIP switch codes but was still vulnerable to the replay attack.

The third stage of garage door opener technology uses a frequency spectrum range between 300-400 MHz and rolling code (code hopping) technology to defeat code grabbers. In addition to transmitting a unique identifier for the remote control, a sequence number and an encrypted message are also sent. Although an intruder could still capture the code used to open a garage door, the sequence number immediately expires, so retransmitting the code later would not open the garage door. The encryption makes it extremely difficult for an intruder to forge a message with the next sequence number that would open the door. Some rolling code systems are more involved than others. Because there is a high probability that someone will push the remote's button while not in range and thus advance the sequence number, the receiver does not insist the sequence number increase by exactly one; it will accept a sequence number that falls within a narrow window or two successive sequence numbers in a much wider window. Rolling code technology is also used on car remote controls and with some internet protocols for secure sites.

The fourth stage of garage door opener systems is similar to third stage, but it is limited to the 315 MHz frequency. The 315 MHz frequency range avoids interference from the land mobile radio system (LMRS) used by the U.S. military.

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Chamberlain (including LiftMaster and Craftsman):

Dates System Color of programming button and LED on unit Color of LED on remote*
1984–1993 8-12 DIP switch on 300-400 MHz white, gray, or yellow button with red LED red
1993–1997 Billion Code on 390 MHz green button with green or red LED green
1997–2005 Security+ (rolling code) on 390 MHz orange or red button with amber LED amber or none
2005–present Security+ (rolling code) on 315 MHz purple button with amber LED none
2011–present Security+ 2.0 (rolling code) on 310, 315, and 390 MHz yellow button with amber LED and yellow antenna wires red or blue

* Does not apply to keyless entry keypads or universal remotes.

Recent Chamberlain garage door openers that have Security+ 2.0 features also use a special serial protocol on wired connections rather than a simple switch closure.[5]

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Overhead Door Corporation and its subsidiary The Genie Company†:

Dates System
1985–1995 9–12 DIP switch on 360, 380, or 390 MHz[6][7]
1995–2005 Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 390 MHz
2005–present Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 315 MHz
2011–present Intellicode 2/CodeDodger 2 (rolling code) on 315 and 390 MHz

Note: There are no standard color codes for the learn button or LED on units manufactured by Overhead Door or Genie. All accessories made for later versions of Genie Intellicode and Overhead Door CodeDodger are backward compatible with previous generations of Intellicode and CodeDodger.

Cloning garage door opener remotes

[edit]
A typical photo of both the outer case and inner circuit of a garage door opener remote control.

Many garage door opener remote controls use fixed-code encoding which use DIP switches or soldering to do the address pins coding process, and they usually use pt2262/pt2272 or compatible ICs. For these fixed-code garage door opener remotes, one can easily clone the existing remote using a self-learning remote control duplicator (copy remote) which can make a copy of the remote using face-to-face copying.

Additional features

[edit]

Additional features that have been added over the years have included:

  • Automatic courtesy lights that turn on when the door opens (or via motion sensors) and automatically turn off after a preset delay
  • A remote lockout feature, which turns off the radio receiver while one is on vacation or away for an extended time.
  • The availability of accessories has increased, including such features as wireless keypads, key chain remotes, and solenoid-operated deadbolts to lock the door itself.
  • Automatic door closing feature, which after a fixed time by the owner, closes the garage door to prevent theft.

More sophisticated features are also available, such as an integrated carbon monoxide sensor to open the door in case of the garage being flooded with exhaust fumes. Other systems allow door activation over the Internet to allow home owners to open their garage door from their office for deliveries.

Another recent innovation in the garage door opener is a fingerprint-based wireless keypad. This unit attaches to the outside of the garage door on the jamb and allows users to open and close their doors with the press of a finger, rather than creating a personal identification number (PIN). This is especially helpful for families with children who may forget a code and are latchkey kids.

Safety

[edit]
Electric eye for safety

The garage door is generally the largest moving object in a home. An improperly adjusted garage door opener can exert strong and deadly forces and might not reverse the garage door in an emergency. The manufacturer's instructions provide guidance to the user on the proper adjustment and maintenance of the opener.

Garage door openers manufactured and installed in the United States since 1982 are required to provide a quick-release mechanism on the trolley that allows for the garage door to be disconnected from the garage door opener in the event of entrapment.[8] Garage door openers manufactured since 1991 are also required to reverse the garage door if it strikes a solid object.[9][10]

In the United States, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 1990 required that automatic residential garage door operators manufactured on or after 1 January 1991 conform to the entrapment protection requirements of the 1988 version of ANSI/UL standard 325.[11] A requirement for redundant entrapment-prevention devices was added in 1993; such a system can use an electric eye, a door edge sensor, or any other device that provides equivalent protection by reversing the travel of the closing door if an object is detected in its path.[12][13]

California Senate Bill No. 969

[edit]

In California, Senate Bill No. 969 requires that any automatic residential garage door opener that is manufactured for sale, sold, offered for sale, or installed in a residence to have a battery backup function that is designed to operate when activated because of an electrical outage.[14] The bill went into effect on July 1, 2019. Under the bill, any automatic garage door opener that is in violation is subject to a civil penalty of $1000.

The bill was passed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Sept. 21, 2018, in response to the 2017 California Wildfires in which at least 5 individuals lost their lives because they could not open their garage door when the power went out.[15]

The Door and Access Systems Manufacturers Association International opposed the bill arguing that garage door openers with backup batteries require regular maintenance and that the bill should be amended to make this clear. In addition, they said that "garage door openers with backup batteries are not designed to serve as life safety devices, and should not be relied upon to prove a means of egress from a garage during an electrical outage."[16]

The bill passed, despite most garage doors having a release pull cord.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Robert J Girod (2014). "Garage Door Openers - High-tech Burglary". Advanced Criminal Investigations and Intelligence Operations: Tradecraft Methods, Practices, Tactics, and Techniques. Taylor and Francis. p. 90. ISBN 9781482230741.
  2. ^ "Aids To Modern Living - Garage Doors". Popular Science: 137. December 1946.
  3. ^ Castro, Diane. "The Complete Garage Door System". Regency Conference Center. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
  4. ^ "Widely Separated Inventors Invent Garage Door Openers By Radio Impulses". Popular Science: 32. February 1931.
  5. ^ "Will my older accessories work with the new line of Security+ 2.0 garage door openers?". alldaygaragerepair.com. Retrieved 2017-06-23.
  6. ^ Willmes, Dave. "My Overhead Door Opener Doesn't Work with this Universal Remote". www.overheaddooronline.com. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  7. ^ "FCC ID BSH8YN106546 by Overhead Door Corporation". FCCID.io. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  8. ^ "Falling Garage Doors — A Crushing Concern". Garage Door Child Safety.
  9. ^ "Non Reversing Garage Door Openers a Hazard" (PDF). U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  10. ^ "Garage Door System Safety Guidelines". Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association International. Archived from the original on 2008-12-23.
  11. ^ Garage Door Operators • CPSC
  12. ^ Non-Reversing Automatic Garage Door Openers Are a Hazard • CPSC
  13. ^ 16CFR1211
  14. ^ "Bill Text - SB-969 Automatic garage door openers: backup batteries". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  15. ^ "New California Law Could Cost You $1000 in Fines". Clark's Garage Door. 4 September 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  16. ^ "California Mandates Battery Backup With All GDOS - Experts Cite Problems With The Legislation" (PDF). dasma.com. DASMA. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
[edit]
  • Official FCC notification on garage opener frequencies (PDF)
  • Garage Door Opener Safety Tips (Washington Post)
  • Safety Commission Rules For Automatic Garage Door Openers - U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC, 1992
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Will County


Driving Directions From Dollar General to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Chillin' Products to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Golden Corral Buffet & Grill to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From First American Bank to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Will County Law Library to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Joliet to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Will County Sheriff Department to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Dellwood Park to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lincoln Landing to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Fox Museum to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Knoch Knolls Nature Center to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Gemini Giant to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Blues Brothers Copmobile to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Des Plaines River viewing point to Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Reviews for Overhead Door Company of Joliet


Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Andrea Nitsche

(4)

Scheduling was easy, job was done quickly. Little disappointed that they gave me a quote over email (which they confirmed was for labor and materials), but when they finished it was just over $30 more. Not a huge deal, but when I asked why, I was told they gave me an approx cost and it depends on what is needed. I get that in general, however, they installed the door and I gave them my address and pics of the existing prior to getting a quote. I feel like they could have been more upfront with pricing. And just a heads up, it was pricey... Had them change the weather stripping, from ringing my doorbell to pulling out my driveway when done was literally 20 mins, cost was just over $260 😬

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Hector Melero

(5)

Had a really great experience with Middleton Overhead Doors. My door started to bow and after several attempts on me fixing it I just couldn’t get it. I didn’t want to pay on something I knew I could fix. Well, I gave up and they came out and made it look easy. I know what they are doing not to mention they called me before hand to confirm my appointment and they showed up at there scheduled appointment. I highly recommend Middleton Overhead Doors on any work that needs to be done

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Kelley Jansa

(5)

We used Middleton Door to upgrade our garage door. We had three different companies come out to quote the job and across the board Middleton was better. They were professional, had plenty of different options and priced appropriately. The door we ordered came with a small dent and they handled getting a new panel ordered and reinstalled very quickly.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

The cost of adding insulation to a garage door can vary based on the type of insulation used, but it generally ranges from $100 to $500 for materials and professional installation.
Common types include foam board, reflective foil, and fiberglass batt. Foam board is often considered the most effective due to its high R-value and ease of installation.
Insulating a garage door can significantly improve energy efficiency by reducing heat loss or gain, leading to lower heating and cooling costs over time.
Yes, many retrofit kits are available that allow homeowners or professionals to add insulation panels or layers to an existing non-insulated garage door.