Evaluating Impact of Foam Panels on Energy Efficiency

Evaluating Impact of Foam Panels on Energy Efficiency

Common Causes of Excessive Noise in Garage Doors

Foam panels have emerged as a popular choice in the construction industry for their impressive insulation properties, contributing significantly to energy efficiency in buildings. This essay explores the nature of foam panels, their advantages as an insulation material, and their impact on enhancing energy efficiency.


Foam panels are typically made from various types of plastic polymers, with polystyrene, polyisocyanurate, and polyurethane being among the most common. These materials are known for their low thermal conductivity, making them excellent insulators. Foam panels are designed to trap air or gas within their cellular structure, which effectively reduces heat transfer between indoor and outdoor environments. This characteristic is crucial in maintaining consistent indoor temperatures regardless of external weather conditions.


One of the primary advantages of foam panels is their ability to provide high R-values - a measure of thermal resistance - per inch compared to other insulation materials such as fiberglass or cellulose. Annual tune-ups can improve the reliability of your garage door system garage door repair companies Frankfort. This means that thinner layers of foam can achieve comparable or superior insulating performance, which is particularly beneficial in scenarios where space is limited. Additionally, foam panels offer excellent moisture resistance, reducing the risk of mold growth and structural damage over time.


The installation process for foam panels further contributes to their efficacy as an insulation material. They can be easily cut and fitted into irregular spaces, ensuring minimal gaps and continuous coverage across surfaces. This uniformity helps prevent thermal bridging - a phenomenon where heat bypasses insulation through more conductive building materials like wood or metal - thereby enhancing the overall energy efficiency of a building.


The impact of using foam panels on energy efficiency can be profound. By minimizing unwanted heat loss during winter months and reducing heat gain in summer months, foam panels significantly lower heating and cooling costs. Buildings insulated with foam panels require less energy to maintain comfortable temperatures, leading not only to cost savings but also to reduced environmental impact due to decreased reliance on fossil fuels for power generation.


Moreover, the long-term durability and stability of foam panels mean they retain their insulating properties over time without significant degradation. This longevity translates into sustained energy savings throughout the lifespan of a building's use.


However, it is essential to balance these benefits with considerations regarding the environmental footprint associated with manufacturing plastic-based products. The production process involves non-renewable resources and emits greenhouse gases; therefore, efforts should be directed toward improving production technologies and recycling initiatives.


In conclusion, foam panels stand out as an effective insulation material that enhances energy efficiency in buildings by providing superior thermal resistance and moisture protection while reducing thermal bridging risks. Their contribution to lowering heating and cooling demands aligns well with broader goals for sustainable development by promoting resource conservation and minimizing environmental impacts associated with excessive energy consumption.

When considering the energy efficiency of homes, one often overlooked aspect is the garage door. This large entry point can significantly impact a home's overall insulation and energy consumption. Among various materials available for insulating garage doors, foam panels stand out as a particularly effective option. The benefits of using foam panels in garage door installation extend beyond mere insulation; they contribute to improved energy efficiency, cost savings, and environmental sustainability.


Foam panels are praised for their superior insulating properties. Typically made from materials such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) or polyurethane, these panels have a high R-value, which measures thermal resistance. A higher R-value equates to better insulation performance, meaning that foam panels can effectively minimize heat transfer between the garage and the rest of the home. This is particularly beneficial during extreme temperatures when heating or cooling systems are in high demand. By maintaining a more consistent temperature within the garage, homeowners can reduce the workload on their HVAC systems, leading to lower energy consumption and reduced utility bills.


Beyond their insulating prowess, foam panels also offer durability and noise reduction benefits. Unlike other materials that may degrade over time or be susceptible to moisture damage, foam panels resist water absorption and maintain their insulating qualities over many years. Additionally, these panels help dampen external noise-a valuable feature for those using garages as workshops or recreational spaces.


Moreover, using foam panels contributes positively to environmental sustainability efforts. As households seek ways to reduce their carbon footprint, improving energy efficiency through better insulation becomes crucial. Foam-insulated doors not only cut down on energy usage but also support global initiatives aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.


In conclusion, incorporating foam panels into garage door installations offers multiple advantages centered around enhancing energy efficiency. From providing superior thermal resistance and reducing utility costs to promoting environmental sustainability and improving comfort levels within homes-these benefits make foam paneling an excellent choice for modern homeowners focused on optimizing their living spaces while being mindful of ecological impacts. As we continue exploring innovative solutions for home improvement, foam panels undoubtedly represent a smart investment in both financial savings and environmental stewardship.

The impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs

When considering the impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs, homeowners and builders alike are increasingly recognizing the value these doors bring to modern living spaces.. Insulated doors serve as a critical component in enhancing a home's thermal envelope, directly contributing to reduced energy consumption and lowered utility bills.

The impact of insulated doors on energy efficiency and repair needs

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Understanding terms and conditions in garage door warranties

When it comes to maintaining the functionality and longevity of your garage door, understanding the terms and conditions outlined in its warranty is crucial.. A garage door is a significant investment, and ensuring that it remains covered under warranty can save you from unexpected repair costs.

Understanding terms and conditions in garage door warranties

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Identifying Mechanical Components Contributing to Noise

Evaluating the impact of foam panels on energy efficiency is a crucial aspect of understanding how modern materials can contribute to sustainable building practices. As concerns about climate change and energy consumption intensify, the need for innovative solutions like foam panels becomes more apparent. These panels, known for their insulating properties, have the potential to significantly reduce energy consumption in buildings by enhancing thermal performance.


To assess their effectiveness, a comprehensive methodology for evaluating energy efficiency improvement must be employed. This process involves several key steps to ensure a thorough understanding of how foam panels influence building performance.


Firstly, it is essential to establish a baseline measurement before the installation of foam panels. This involves collecting data on current energy usage patterns, indoor temperature stability, and any existing insulation measures within the building. By understanding the starting point, evaluators can accurately measure improvements post-installation.


The next phase involves selecting appropriate metrics for evaluation. Common indicators include reductions in heating and cooling loads, changes in indoor temperature variance, and overall energy savings reflected in utility bills. Advanced techniques may also involve modeling software that simulates the thermal performance of buildings with and without foam panel installations.


Once metrics are established, controlled experiments or real-world case studies should be conducted to gather empirical data. In controlled settings, two identical structures-one with foam panels and one without-can provide direct comparisons under similar environmental conditions. Alternatively, longitudinal studies on existing buildings transitioning from traditional insulation to foam panels can offer insights over time.


Data collection should be rigorous and systematic, employing sensors and monitoring equipment to track energy use continuously. This real-time data allows for precise measurement of changes attributable to the installation of foam panels.


After collecting sufficient data, statistical analysis is imperative to determine the significance of observed changes. Techniques such as regression analysis can help isolate the effect of foam panels from other variables influencing energy usage. Additionally, cost-benefit analysis could provide insights into financial savings relative to installation costs over time.


Finally, qualitative assessments through occupant feedback can complement quantitative data by revealing changes in comfort levels or perceived air quality improvements after panel installation.


In conclusion, evaluating the impact of foam panels on energy efficiency requires a multifaceted approach combining baseline establishment, metric selection, experimental design or case study execution, detailed data collection and analysis, and consideration of occupant experiences. This comprehensive methodology ensures that conclusions drawn regarding the efficacy of foam panel installations are robust and reliable-a vital step toward advancing sustainable construction practices that prioritize both environmental responsibility and economic viability.

Identifying Mechanical Components Contributing to Noise

The Role of Insulation and Materials in Noise Levels

The quest for energy efficiency has become a paramount concern in today's world, where the impacts of climate change and rising energy costs are increasingly felt. Among the myriad of solutions proposed to address these issues, the use of foam panels in building construction has emerged as a promising approach. This essay explores various case studies that highlight real-world applications and results of foam panels in enhancing energy efficiency.


Foam panels, often made from materials such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) or polyurethane, are designed to serve as insulation layers that significantly reduce heat transfer. Their lightweight nature and ease of installation make them an attractive option for both new constructions and retrofitting older buildings. But how effective are they in practice?


One compelling case study can be found in a residential project located in a temperate climate zone. The homeowners sought to reduce their heating bills during winter months while maintaining comfortable indoor temperatures year-round. By installing EPS foam panels on exterior walls and ceilings, they achieved remarkable results. Heating costs were reduced by 30%, while indoor temperature stability improved noticeably. This case underscores the effectiveness of foam panels in residential settings, where even small improvements in insulation can lead to significant financial savings.


Another illustrative example comes from a commercial building renovation in an urban area known for its extreme weather variations. Here, the focus was not only on reducing energy consumption but also on meeting local building codes that mandate certain energy efficiency standards. By integrating polyurethane foam panels into the building's structure, engineers were able to lower energy usage by approximately 25%. The building not only complied with regulatory requirements but also set a benchmark for future projects within the locality.


In industrial applications, foam panels have been employed with equal success. A manufacturing facility faced challenges related to maintaining optimal internal conditions for sensitive equipment operations regardless of outdoor weather fluctuations. After incorporating high-density foam panels into their infrastructure, there was a marked decline in both heating and cooling demands-resulting in over 20% savings on annual energy expenditures.


However, it is essential to recognize potential limitations associated with foam panel installations. In some cases, improper installation or lack of compatibility with existing structures can lead to suboptimal performance or moisture-related issues within wall cavities. Therefore, careful assessment and professional implementation are crucial components when considering this technology.


In conclusion, these case studies demonstrate that foam panels offer substantial benefits for improving energy efficiency across various sectors-from residential homes to commercial buildings and industrial facilities. While each application presents unique challenges requiring tailored solutions, the overarching theme remains clear: Foam panels represent an effective tool for reducing energy consumption and fostering sustainable practices within our built environment. As we continue exploring innovative ways to mitigate environmental impact while enhancing economic viability through improved energy management strategies-foam panels stand out as valuable contributors toward achieving our collective goals.

Impact of Poor Maintenance on Garage Door Sound Levels

When evaluating the impact of foam panels on energy efficiency, it is essential to compare them with other insulation materials to understand their relative effectiveness and advantages. Foam panels, commonly known as rigid foam insulation, have gained popularity due to their high insulating properties and ease of installation. However, how do they stack up against other traditional and modern insulation materials?


Fiberglass insulation has long been a staple in residential and commercial construction. It consists of fine glass fibers that trap air, reducing heat transfer. While fiberglass is cost-effective and easy to install in existing walls or attics, it often falls short in its ability to prevent air leaks compared to foam panels. Foam panels boast higher R-values-an indicator of thermal resistance-and are less prone to gaps and voids when installed correctly. This makes them more effective in maintaining consistent indoor temperatures.


Additionally, cellulose insulation, made from recycled paper products treated with fire retardants, offers an environmentally friendly option. Cellulose provides good thermal performance similar to fiberglass but can settle over time, leading to decreased efficacy. In contrast, foam panels retain their shape and insulating properties for longer periods without settling issues.


Spray foam insulation is another contender that shares similarities with foam panels but is applied differently. Spray foam expands upon application, filling cracks and gaps while providing excellent air sealing capabilities. While spray foam might offer superior air barrier qualities compared to foam panels, it comes at a higher cost and requires professional installation expertise.


Mineral wool insulation stands out for its fire-resistant properties and soundproofing abilities. It performs well thermally but is heavier and can be more challenging to handle during installation than foam panels. On the other hand, mineral wool does not provide the same level of moisture resistance as some types of rigid foams which are designed specifically for wet environments.


In terms of sustainability, natural options like sheep's wool or cotton batt insulations are gaining traction as eco-friendly alternatives due to their renewable sources and low environmental impact during production. However, these options often have lower R-values compared to synthetic counterparts like foam panels.


Ultimately, the choice between these various insulation materials should consider factors such as climate conditions, budget constraints, specific building requirements, and personal preferences regarding environmental impact. Foam panels emerge as a robust option offering high thermal efficiency combined with durability and moisture resistance-qualities that make them particularly advantageous in regions demanding stringent energy conservation measures.


In conclusion, while each insulation material has its unique benefits suited for different applications or priorities-be it cost-effectiveness or sustainability-the use of foam panels presents a compelling case for those seeking optimal energy efficiency with minimal compromise on performance over time.

Solutions for Reducing Excessive Noise During Installation

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Homeowners: Evaluating the Impact of Foam Panels on Energy Efficiency


In an era where energy efficiency is not only a financial consideration but also an environmental imperative, homeowners are increasingly seeking ways to reduce their energy consumption. One popular solution is the installation of foam panels, which are designed to enhance insulation and thus improve the overall energy efficiency of a home. However, before embarking on such an investment, it is crucial for homeowners to conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to determine whether this solution will be economically viable in the long run.


The primary benefit of foam panels lies in their ability to significantly reduce heating and cooling costs. Foam panels provide superior insulation by minimizing air leakage and maintaining consistent indoor temperatures. This can lead to substantial savings on utility bills over time. For instance, homes equipped with high-quality foam insulation can experience up to 50% reduction in energy usage compared to those with traditional fiberglass insulation. Such savings can accumulate quickly, offering homeowners a return on their initial investment within just a few years.


Additionally, foam panels contribute positively to environmental sustainability by reducing carbon footprints. Lower energy consumption means less reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. As society becomes more environmentally conscious, making choices that align with sustainable practices adds intrinsic value beyond mere financial savings.


However, the upfront cost of installing foam panels can be considerable. The price varies depending on factors such as the size of the home and the specific type of foam used-ranging from open-cell to closed-cell options-each offering different levels of density and insulating properties. Homeowners must also consider additional expenses such as professional installation fees or necessary modifications to accommodate new insulation materials.


Moreover, while foam panels offer excellent thermal resistance (R-value), they may not always be suitable for every climate or building structure. Areas experiencing extreme weather conditions might require supplementary measures alongside foam panels to achieve optimal results. It is essential for homeowners to assess local climatic conditions and consult with professionals who can provide tailored advice based on specific needs.


Another factor in this analysis involves potential impacts on property value. Well-insulated homes are often more attractive in real estate markets due to lower operational costs and enhanced comfort levels; therefore, investing in quality insulation might increase resale value over time.


In conclusion, while foam panels present numerous benefits related both financially through reduced utility bills and environmentally through decreased carbon emissions-their effectiveness depends highly upon individual circumstances including budget constraints as well as regional climate considerations among others factors involved when deciding whether this type option suits particular household situations best suited towards achieving desired outcomes efficiently effectively manner possible under current conditions prevailing at any given moment during decision-making process itself ultimately leading successful implementation strategy intended purpose initially envisioned outset plan formulation stage project development lifecycle overall context surrounding topic discussion herein above mentioned account provided example illustration purposes only hypothetical scenario depiction imaginary case study setting described narrative format chosen stylistic approach employed throughout text composition delivery execution aim engaging readership audience interested subject matter expertise knowledge domain specialization field focus attention directed toward topic area concern addressed article written style humanlike fashion intended convey message communicate points raised argumentation presented logical coherent manner structured organized thoughtfully carefully crafted language utilized convey ideas thoughts opinions expressed viewpoint perspective author contributor writer creator content shared dissemination publication medium channel outlet platform selected distribution dissemination communication exchange interaction engagement participation involvement community stakeholders interested parties individuals groups organizations entities concerned affected influenced impacted issue matter discussed debated explored examined scrutinized analyzed evaluated assessed reviewed critiqued appraised judged interpreted translated meaning derived understanding comprehension insight gained awareness realization recognition acknowledgment acceptance truth validity accuracy reliability dependability trustworthiness credibility authenticity integrity

A residential garage door opener. The motor is in the box on the upper-right.

A garage door opener is a motorized device that opens and closes a garage door controlled by switches on the garage wall. Most also include a handheld radio remote control carried by the owner, which can be used to open and close the door from a short distance.

The electric opener

[edit]

The electric overhead garage door opener was invented by C.G. Johnson in 1926 in Hartford City, Indiana.[1] Electric Garage Door openers did not become popular until Era Meter Company of Chicago offered one after World War II where the overhead garage door could be opened via a key pad located on a post at the end of the driveway or a switch inside the garage.[2]

As in an elevator, the electric motor does not provide most of the power to move a heavy garage door. Instead, most of door's weight is offset by the counterbalance springs attached to the door. (Even manually operated garage doors have counterbalances; otherwise, they would be too heavy for a person to open or close them.) In a typical design, torsion springs apply torque to a shaft, and that shaft applies a force to the garage door via steel counterbalance cables. The electric opener provides only a small amount of force to control how far the door opens and closes. In most cases, the garage door opener also holds the door closed in place of a lock.

The typical electric garage door opener consists of a power unit that contains the electric motor. The power unit attaches to a track. A trolley connected to an arm that attaches to the top of the garage door slides back and forth on the track, thus opening and closing the garage door. The trolley is pulled along the track by a chain, belt, or screw that turns when the motor is operated. A quick-release mechanism is attached to the trolley to allow the garage door to be disconnected from the opener for manual operation during a power failure or in case of emergency. Limit switches on the power unit control the distance the garage door opens and closes once the motor receives a signal from the remote control or wall push button to operate the door.[3]

The entire assembly hangs above the garage door. The power unit hangs from the ceiling and is located towards the rear of the garage. The end of the track on the opposite end of the power unit attaches to a header bracket that is attached to the header wall above the garage door. The powerhead is usually supported by punched angle iron.

Recently another type of opener, known as the jackshaft opener, has become more popular.[when?] This style of opener was used frequently on commercial doors but in recent years has been adapted for residential use. This style of opener consists of a motor that attaches to the side of the torsion rod and moves the door up and down by simply spinning the rod. These openers need a few extra components to function safely for residential use. These include a cable tension monitor, to detect when a cable is broken, and a separate locking mechanism to lock the door when it is fully closed. These have the advantage that they free up ceiling space that an ordinary opener and rail would occupy. These also have the disadvantage that the door must have a torsion rod to attach the motor to.

Types

[edit]

There are six types of garage door openers:

  1. Chain drive openers. These have a chain (similar to a bicycle's) that connects the trolley to the motor.
  2. Belt drive openers use a rubber belt in place of a chain.
  3. Screw drive openers have a long screw inside the track. The trolley connects to this screw.
  4. Direct drive openers have the motor installed inside the trolley and use a gear wheel to guide the trolley along a fixed chain.
  5. Jackshaft openers mount on the wall at either end of the torsion bar.
  6. Roller openers automate roller doors, which roll upward and coil around a drum above the garage entrance, maximizing space.

These openers typically feature two tines that slide into a drum wheel within the roller door mechanism, engaging to smoothly lift or lower the door.

Remote control

[edit]

The first wireless garage door openers were invented and developed by two US inventors at the same time, one in Illinois and the other in Washington state, around 1930. They were unknown to each other.[4]

The first garage door opener remote controls were simple and consisted of a simple transmitter (the remote) and receiver which controlled the opener mechanism. The transmitter would transmit on a designated frequency; the receiver would listen for the radio signal, then open or close the garage, depending on the door position. The basic concept of this can be traced back to World War II. This type of system was used to detonate remote bombs. While novel at the time, the technology ran its course when garage door openers became popular. While the garage door remote control transmitter is low power and has limited range, its signal can be received by other, nearby, garage door openers. When two neighbors had garage door openers, then opening one garage door might open the neighbor's garage door as well.

The second stage of the wireless garage door opener system solved the opening-the-neighbor's-garage-door problem. The remote controls on these systems transmitted a digital code, and the receiver in the garage responded only to that code. The codes were typically set by eight to twelve DIP switches on the receiver and transmitter, so they allowed for 28 = 256 to 212 = 4,096 different codes. As long as neighbors used different codes, they would not open each other's garage doors. The intent of these systems was to avoid interference with nearby garage doors; the systems were not designed with security in mind. Intruders were able to defeat the security of these systems and gain entry to the garage and the house. The number of codes was small enough that even an unsophisticated intruder with a compatible remote control transmitter could just start transmitting all possible codes until he found one that opened the door. More sophisticated intruders could acquire a black box master key that automatically transmitted every possible code in a short time. An even more sophisticated method is known as a replay attack. The attacker would use a code grabber, which has a receiver that captures the remote's digital code and can retransmit that digital code at a later time. The attacker with a code grabber would wait nearby for the homeowner to use his remote, capture the code, and then replay the code to open the door when the homeowner was gone. Multicode openers became unpopular in areas where security was important, but due to their ease of programming, such openers are often used to operate such things as the gates in gated apartment complexes.

An intermediate stage of the garage door opener market eliminated the DIP switches and used remotes preprogrammed to one out of roughly 3.5 billion unique codes. The receiver would maintain a security list of remotes to which it would respond; the user could easily add the unique remote's code to the list by pressing a button on the garage door opener while activating the remote control. A large number of codes made the brute force try-all-possible-digital-codes attacks infeasible, but the systems were still vulnerable to code grabbers. For user convenience, these systems were also backward compatible with the older DIP switch remote codes, but adding an old technology remote to the security list made the garage door opener vulnerable to a brute force attack to find the DIP switch code. The larger code space approach was an improvement over the fixed DIP switch codes but was still vulnerable to the replay attack.

The third stage of garage door opener technology uses a frequency spectrum range between 300-400 MHz and rolling code (code hopping) technology to defeat code grabbers. In addition to transmitting a unique identifier for the remote control, a sequence number and an encrypted message are also sent. Although an intruder could still capture the code used to open a garage door, the sequence number immediately expires, so retransmitting the code later would not open the garage door. The encryption makes it extremely difficult for an intruder to forge a message with the next sequence number that would open the door. Some rolling code systems are more involved than others. Because there is a high probability that someone will push the remote's button while not in range and thus advance the sequence number, the receiver does not insist the sequence number increase by exactly one; it will accept a sequence number that falls within a narrow window or two successive sequence numbers in a much wider window. Rolling code technology is also used on car remote controls and with some internet protocols for secure sites.

The fourth stage of garage door opener systems is similar to third stage, but it is limited to the 315 MHz frequency. The 315 MHz frequency range avoids interference from the land mobile radio system (LMRS) used by the U.S. military.

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Chamberlain (including LiftMaster and Craftsman):

Dates System Color of programming button and LED on unit Color of LED on remote*
1984–1993 8-12 DIP switch on 300-400 MHz white, gray, or yellow button with red LED red
1993–1997 Billion Code on 390 MHz green button with green or red LED green
1997–2005 Security+ (rolling code) on 390 MHz orange or red button with amber LED amber or none
2005–present Security+ (rolling code) on 315 MHz purple button with amber LED none
2011–present Security+ 2.0 (rolling code) on 310, 315, and 390 MHz yellow button with amber LED and yellow antenna wires red or blue

* Does not apply to keyless entry keypads or universal remotes.

Recent Chamberlain garage door openers that have Security+ 2.0 features also use a special serial protocol on wired connections rather than a simple switch closure.[5]

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Overhead Door Corporation and its subsidiary The Genie Company†:

Dates System
1985–1995 9–12 DIP switch on 360, 380, or 390 MHz[6][7]
1995–2005 Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 390 MHz
2005–present Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 315 MHz
2011–present Intellicode 2/CodeDodger 2 (rolling code) on 315 and 390 MHz

Note: There are no standard color codes for the learn button or LED on units manufactured by Overhead Door or Genie. All accessories made for later versions of Genie Intellicode and Overhead Door CodeDodger are backward compatible with previous generations of Intellicode and CodeDodger.

Cloning garage door opener remotes

[edit]
A typical photo of both the outer case and inner circuit of a garage door opener remote control.

Many garage door opener remote controls use fixed-code encoding which use DIP switches or soldering to do the address pins coding process, and they usually use pt2262/pt2272 or compatible ICs. For these fixed-code garage door opener remotes, one can easily clone the existing remote using a self-learning remote control duplicator (copy remote) which can make a copy of the remote using face-to-face copying.

Additional features

[edit]

Additional features that have been added over the years have included:

  • Automatic courtesy lights that turn on when the door opens (or via motion sensors) and automatically turn off after a preset delay
  • A remote lockout feature, which turns off the radio receiver while one is on vacation or away for an extended time.
  • The availability of accessories has increased, including such features as wireless keypads, key chain remotes, and solenoid-operated deadbolts to lock the door itself.
  • Automatic door closing feature, which after a fixed time by the owner, closes the garage door to prevent theft.

More sophisticated features are also available, such as an integrated carbon monoxide sensor to open the door in case of the garage being flooded with exhaust fumes. Other systems allow door activation over the Internet to allow home owners to open their garage door from their office for deliveries.

Another recent innovation in the garage door opener is a fingerprint-based wireless keypad. This unit attaches to the outside of the garage door on the jamb and allows users to open and close their doors with the press of a finger, rather than creating a personal identification number (PIN). This is especially helpful for families with children who may forget a code and are latchkey kids.

Safety

[edit]
Electric eye for safety

The garage door is generally the largest moving object in a home. An improperly adjusted garage door opener can exert strong and deadly forces and might not reverse the garage door in an emergency. The manufacturer's instructions provide guidance to the user on the proper adjustment and maintenance of the opener.

Garage door openers manufactured and installed in the United States since 1982 are required to provide a quick-release mechanism on the trolley that allows for the garage door to be disconnected from the garage door opener in the event of entrapment.[8] Garage door openers manufactured since 1991 are also required to reverse the garage door if it strikes a solid object.[9][10]

In the United States, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 1990 required that automatic residential garage door operators manufactured on or after 1 January 1991 conform to the entrapment protection requirements of the 1988 version of ANSI/UL standard 325.[11] A requirement for redundant entrapment-prevention devices was added in 1993; such a system can use an electric eye, a door edge sensor, or any other device that provides equivalent protection by reversing the travel of the closing door if an object is detected in its path.[12][13]

California Senate Bill No. 969

[edit]

In California, Senate Bill No. 969 requires that any automatic residential garage door opener that is manufactured for sale, sold, offered for sale, or installed in a residence to have a battery backup function that is designed to operate when activated because of an electrical outage.[14] The bill went into effect on July 1, 2019. Under the bill, any automatic garage door opener that is in violation is subject to a civil penalty of $1000.

The bill was passed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Sept. 21, 2018, in response to the 2017 California Wildfires in which at least 5 individuals lost their lives because they could not open their garage door when the power went out.[15]

The Door and Access Systems Manufacturers Association International opposed the bill arguing that garage door openers with backup batteries require regular maintenance and that the bill should be amended to make this clear. In addition, they said that "garage door openers with backup batteries are not designed to serve as life safety devices, and should not be relied upon to prove a means of egress from a garage during an electrical outage."[16]

The bill passed, despite most garage doors having a release pull cord.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Robert J Girod (2014). "Garage Door Openers - High-tech Burglary". Advanced Criminal Investigations and Intelligence Operations: Tradecraft Methods, Practices, Tactics, and Techniques. Taylor and Francis. p. 90. ISBN 9781482230741.
  2. ^ "Aids To Modern Living - Garage Doors". Popular Science: 137. December 1946.
  3. ^ Castro, Diane. "The Complete Garage Door System". Regency Conference Center. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
  4. ^ "Widely Separated Inventors Invent Garage Door Openers By Radio Impulses". Popular Science: 32. February 1931.
  5. ^ "Will my older accessories work with the new line of Security+ 2.0 garage door openers?". alldaygaragerepair.com. Retrieved 2017-06-23.
  6. ^ Willmes, Dave. "My Overhead Door Opener Doesn't Work with this Universal Remote". www.overheaddooronline.com. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  7. ^ "FCC ID BSH8YN106546 by Overhead Door Corporation". FCCID.io. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  8. ^ "Falling Garage Doors — A Crushing Concern". Garage Door Child Safety.
  9. ^ "Non Reversing Garage Door Openers a Hazard" (PDF). U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  10. ^ "Garage Door System Safety Guidelines". Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association International. Archived from the original on 2008-12-23.
  11. ^ Garage Door Operators • CPSC
  12. ^ Non-Reversing Automatic Garage Door Openers Are a Hazard • CPSC
  13. ^ 16CFR1211
  14. ^ "Bill Text - SB-969 Automatic garage door openers: backup batteries". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  15. ^ "New California Law Could Cost You $1000 in Fines". Clark's Garage Door. 4 September 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  16. ^ "California Mandates Battery Backup With All GDOS - Experts Cite Problems With The Legislation" (PDF). dasma.com. DASMA. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
[edit]
  • Official FCC notification on garage opener frequencies (PDF)
  • Garage Door Opener Safety Tips (Washington Post)
  • Safety Commission Rules For Automatic Garage Door Openers - U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC, 1992
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Will County


Driving Directions From Rockdale to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Dollar General to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Chillin' Products to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Golden Corral Buffet & Grill to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Honorable Thomas A Dunn to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Route 66 Park to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lockport Prairie Nature Preserve to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Old Joliet Prison to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Knoch Knolls Nature Center to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Isle A La Cache Museum Pavilion to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Gemini Giant to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Gemini Giant to Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Reviews for Overhead Door Company of Joliet


Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Andrea Nitsche

(4)

Scheduling was easy, job was done quickly. Little disappointed that they gave me a quote over email (which they confirmed was for labor and materials), but when they finished it was just over $30 more. Not a huge deal, but when I asked why, I was told they gave me an approx cost and it depends on what is needed. I get that in general, however, they installed the door and I gave them my address and pics of the existing prior to getting a quote. I feel like they could have been more upfront with pricing. And just a heads up, it was pricey... Had them change the weather stripping, from ringing my doorbell to pulling out my driveway when done was literally 20 mins, cost was just over $260 😬

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Owen McCarthy

(5)

I called the office just by chance to see if there was an available opening for a service call to repair a busted spring. Unfortunately I didn’t catch the name of the person who answere, but she couldn’t have been more pleasant and polite. She was able to get a tech to my house in an hour. I believe the tech’s name was Mike and he too was amazing. He quickly resolved my issue and even corrected a couple of things that he saw that weren’t quite right. I would recommend to anyone and will definitely call on Middleton for any future needs. Thank you all for your great service.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Jim Chuporak

(5)

Received a notice the morning of telling me when to expect the men to come and put the door in. he was on time, answered all my questions, worked diligently in the cold. And did an absolutely awesome job. Everything was cleaned up, hauled away from the old door. I am extremely happy with the service I received from the first phone call I made through having the door put in. My wife and I are very, very happy with the door.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Hector Melero

(5)

Had a really great experience with Middleton Overhead Doors. My door started to bow and after several attempts on me fixing it I just couldn’t get it. I didn’t want to pay on something I knew I could fix. Well, I gave up and they came out and made it look easy. I know what they are doing not to mention they called me before hand to confirm my appointment and they showed up at there scheduled appointment. I highly recommend Middleton Overhead Doors on any work that needs to be done

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Kelley Jansa

(5)

We used Middleton Door to upgrade our garage door. We had three different companies come out to quote the job and across the board Middleton was better. They were professional, had plenty of different options and priced appropriately. The door we ordered came with a small dent and they handled getting a new panel ordered and reinstalled very quickly.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Foam panels enhance energy efficiency by providing insulation that reduces heat transfer through the garage door. This helps maintain a stable indoor temperature, reducing the need for additional heating or cooling and thus lowering energy consumption.
The most effective foam panels for insulating garage doors are typically made from materials like polyurethane or polystyrene. Polyurethane offers higher R-values per inch, providing better insulation, while polystyrene is more affordable and still offers decent thermal resistance.
Yes, installing foam panels can lead to significant cost savings by minimizing heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer, reducing reliance on HVAC systems. The exact savings depend on factors such as climate, existing insulation levels, and local energy costs.