close
Saturday, February 19, 2022

Magodo: Lagos govt returns to Supreme Court as settlement talks break down

The Lagos government said it was approaching the apex court due to failure of landlords to reach a consensus on how to issue the certificates of occupancy.

• February 19, 2022

Lagos State Government has approached the Supreme Court to seek clarification on the judgment delivered by the apex court on the ownership of the Shangisha/Magodo land.

Gbenga Omotoso, Lagos Commissioner for Information, in a statement on Friday, disclosed that the move to approach the apex court followed the failure of landlords to reach a consensus on how the certificates of occupancy on the plot of lands allocated to the Shangisha landlords would be issued.

“Following the intervention of Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, officials of the State Government and representatives of the Shangisha Landlords Association (the judgment creditors) held a series of meetings at which both parties explored the possibility of complying with the judgment of the Supreme Court,” the statement reads.

“Given the sharp divide between the two factions of the judgment creditors on who has authority to represent the Association and the disagreement regarding whom the certificate of occupancy should be issued (collectively or individually), the State Government has approached the Supreme Court to seek further directives and clarifications on both issues,” it added.

The Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, while wading into the dispute in January disclosed that he ordered the police to invade the estate to enforce Supreme Court’s judgement.

Mr Malami, in a statement by his spokesman, Umar Gwandu, noted the controversy ensued over a failure of the Lagos government to follow through with a Supreme Court judgment.

Mr Malami stated that he was displeased with “the South-West governors’ unjustifiable insinuation of impunity against the office of the attorney general over (the) execution of a judgment of the Supreme Court.”

However, the Lagos state government in January disclosed that it had reached an agreement with the landlords on a settlement plan after the Supreme court ordered it to give some landlords 549 plots of land as a “matter of first priority” following the demolition of their properties at Shangisha.

The race for possession of Magodo began in 1988 when the Shangisha Landlord Association challenged the Lagos government. After multiple proceedings at the high court, the appeal court and the Supreme Court, it was ruled that members of the association should be given 549 plots of land in the area.

More from Peoples Gazette

Economy

Buhari regime will continue to borrow without subsidy removal: Femi Adesina

“You know how much could have been saved if the subsidy was removed and how it could have been diverted to other areas and spheres of national life.

Gboyega Oyetola, Bola Tinubu and Rauf Aregbesola

Politics

Aregbesola cries foul as Oyetola takes early lead in Osun APC guber primaries

Aregbesola supporters are insinuating that the voting exercise was manipulated to favour Mr Oyetola.

Vice President Yemi Osinbajo

Politics

Petition to make Osinbajo run for president fails to garner 500 signatures in 24 hours

Mr Osinbajo has continued to delay public announcement of his ambition, fueling speculation he could be afraid of challenging Bola Tinubu.

Blessing Okagbare

Sport

Okagbare says lawyers studying 10-year ban for next line of action

Okagbare was handed the ban for multiple breaches of anti-doping rules by the AIU on Friday.

Adegboyega-Oyetola

States

Osun APC Primary: Oyetola clears all votes in own ward

The governor scored 1,612 votes to beat Moshood Adeoti and Lasun Yusuf, who scored no vote.

Vice President Yemi Osinbajo

Abuja

We still hope to fix Nigeria’s broken judiciary: Osinbajo

The vice president chaired a symposium in honour of Bankole Aluko, a legal icon.

States

Death toll rises to three as 3,000 shelters destroyed in Borno IDPs camp fire

The fire began from a tent and gutted other shelters because there was no immediate fire service response.