New chemicals proposals: advantages far outweigh industry cost concerns

Last edited 22 July 2003 at 8:00am
Greenpeace installs giant test tube at EU chemical industry meeting

Greenpeace installs giant test tube at EU chemical industry meeting

The European Commission is currently preparing new chemicals legislation called REACH. The proposals are designed to clean up chemical production and use to ensure products are safer for the environment and human health. However the proposals have been fiercely attacked by the European chemicals industry.

Since the original proposals were put forward, the European chemicals industry has tried to argue that it will cost too much to to replace dangerous chemicals in products. It has been forced to reduce its earlier, absurd estimates and has agreed on a high-end figure estimated by the EU - around €7 billion over eleven years. This is about 0.1% of the European chemical industry's annual turnover.

It is essential that industry undertakes the research and development necessary to make their products safe, and if this leads to a small short-term rise in costs then this merely illustrates how they have been evading their responsibilities.

There have also been several estimates of the possible economic benefits of REACH. Studies have been produced which suggest that increased regulation in chemicals may produce greater innovation and a comparative advantage in the global market. Others have focussed on the health costs of hazardous chemicals. European Commission information suggests that allergies (in many cases linked to the chemicals which should be regulated) cost Europe €45 billion each year. Another recent report finds that the economic benefits from reduced health problems and corresponding productivity will be roughly ten times the estimated costs of making the changes. And that's without taking into account the potential environmental benefits of the REACH.

Follow Greenpeace UK