Light Cure Technologies and Bonding Efficiency

Light Cure Technologies and Bonding Efficiency

Understanding brackets: Types and functions in orthodontic treatment

In orthodontics, light cure technologies play a crucial role in bonding brackets to teeth, ensuring they remain firmly attached throughout treatment. Over the years, various light sources have been developed to enhance bonding efficiency, each with its unique advantages and limitations.


Halogen lights were among the first to be used for this purpose. These traditional curing lights utilize a tungsten filament that produces light when heated by an electrical current. Jaw growth issues are easier to correct at an early age Child-friendly orthodontic solutions United States. Halogen lights are reliable and cost-effective but have some drawbacks. They generate significant heat, which can cause discomfort for patients and potential pulpal damage if not managed properly. Additionally, their light intensity degrades over time due to aging of the bulb, which can lead to inconsistent curing times and reduced bond strength.


With advancements in technology came LED (Light Emitting Diode) lights, which have become increasingly popular in orthodontic practices. LEDs produce light through a process called electroluminescence, converting electrical energy directly into light with minimal heat production. This results in a cooler curing process, enhancing patient comfort and reducing the risk of pulpal damage. Furthermore, LEDs maintain consistent light intensity over time, ensuring more predictable bond strengths. They also offer faster curing times compared to halogen lights, improving clinical efficiency. However, early generations of LED lights had narrow spectral ranges that sometimes resulted in inadequate polymerization of certain resins.


Plasma arc lights represent another innovation in light cure technology. These devices use a high-voltage electrical current to ionize gas within a small chamber, creating plasma that emits an intense beam of light. Plasma arc lights offer very high light intensities capable of rapidly curing adhesives-even those with deeper pigmentation or greater thicknesses-making them particularly advantageous for certain clinical situations requiring quick and strong bonds. Nevertheless, their high initial cost and potential safety concerns related to intense UV radiation exposure have limited their widespread adoption compared to LEDs.


When evaluating these technologies for bonding efficiency, several factors come into play: wavelength spectrum compatibility with photoinitiators within adhesive resins; adequate irradiance levels; appropriate exposure durations; and minimal heat generation during the curing process. Modern LED systems generally excel across these parameters when compared against older halogen units or even plasma arc systems due to their balance between efficacy and practicality within clinical settings without compromising patient safety or comfort considerations significantly influencing outcomes favorably towards better treatment results overall consistently observed clinically validated studies outlined previously mentioned attributes exemplified clearly underpinning superior performance reliably achieved daily routine usage standardly adopted contemporary orthodontic practices globally widespread acceptance acknowledging benefits realized overcoming past limitations encountered earlier iterations technological advancements continuously ongoing basis progressive evolution field dental materials sciences enhancing capabilities optimizing treatments further refinement expected foreseeable future continuing trend toward greater precision accuracy personalized care tailored individual patient needs ultimately improving overall quality life long lasting positive impact oral health wellbeing general population benefiting tremendously consequently forthcoming developments eagerly awaited anticipated keenly interested stakeholders practitioners alike alike

In the realm of pediatric orthodontics, the efficacy of bonding agents is pivotal for successful treatment outcomes. The transition from traditional chemical cure adhesives to light cure technologies has brought about significant advancements, altering clinical practices and enhancing bonding efficiency. This shift is particularly crucial in pediatric orthodontics, where patient cooperation and comfort are paramount.


Traditional chemical cure adhesives have been a staple in orthodontic practices for decades. These adhesives rely on chemical reactions to harden and set, typically involving a two-part system that mixes resin with a catalyst. While effective, this process can be time-consuming and may lead to inconsistencies in bond strength due to variability in mixing ratios and environmental factors such as humidity and temperature. Additionally, these adhesives often require longer setting times which can be challenging for young patients who may find it difficult staying still during treatment sessions . This has led practitioners towards seeking more efficient alternatives leading them towards embracing light cure technologies .Light cure adhesives offer several advantages over their chemical counterparts especially pertinent within pediatric orthodontics . Light curable adhesives utilize photopolymerization where exposure visible blue light initiates hardening process making bond formation swift precise controllable . This rapidity significantly reduces chair time enhancing patient compliance since younger patients tend having shorter attention spans making extended procedures problematic . Moreover ,light cure adhesives exhibit superior bond strengths which results better retention rates brackets attachments reducing likelihood debond failures thereby minimizing need frequent reattachments adjustments .The precision offered by controlled exposure times also diminishes risk excess adhesive residue commonly associated traditional methods promoting better oral hygiene amongst young patients who might struggle maintaining thorough cleaning routines . Nevertheless ,it important acknowledge certain limitations exist when considering bond efficiency light cure systems primarily sensitivity ambient lighting premature polymerization potential heat generation during curing process although modern advancements LED technology mitigated these concerns largely . In conclusion ,while both chemical conventional light curable systems possess unique merits demands context pediatric orthodontic care distinctively favor latter owing its speed precision enhanced bond strengths promoting positive treatment experiences younger demographic . As research technology continue evolve expect further innovations refinements light cure technologies solidifying their role standard bearers modern orthodontic practice .

More about us:

Social Media:

Facebook About Us:


How brackets contribute to the alignment and movement of teeth

In the realm of orthodontics, light cure technologies have emerged as a cornerstone for efficient and effective bonding procedures. This is especially relevant when it comes to treating children, where safety and effectiveness are paramount concerns. The process of bonding orthodontic brackets to teeth involves using a light-sensitive adhesive that hardens upon exposure to specific wavelengths of light, typically blue light.


The evaluation of these technologies encompasses several critical aspects. Firstly, safety is a primary consideration. Children's teeth and surrounding tissues are more sensitive compared to adults, making it essential to ensure that the light used does not cause any harm. Modern light cure units are designed with safety features such as automatic shut-off timers and controlled intensity levels to minimize risks such as thermal damage or eye injury.


Effectiveness is another crucial factor. Proper bonding ensures that brackets remain securely attached throughout treatment, which is vital for achieving desired orthodontic outcomes. Light cure technologies offer high bond strength, reducing the likelihood of bracket failure and subsequent need for re-bonding procedures. This not only saves time but also minimizes discomfort for young patients who may already be anxious about their treatment.


Additionally, advancements in light cure technologies have led to shorter curing times without compromising bond strength. This efficiency is particularly beneficial for children who may struggle with sitting still for extended periods during dental appointments. Reduced chair time can make the overall experience more comfortable and less stressful for both the child and the orthodontist.


Another aspect worth considering is the ease of use for orthodontists. User-friendly interfaces and ergonomic designs allow practitioners to focus more on patient care rather than technical complications. This streamlined approach ensures consistent results across different cases, further enhancing treatment reliability.


In conclusion, light cure technologies have significantly enhanced the safety and effectiveness of bonding procedures in pediatric orthodontics. By ensuring secure attachment, minimizing chair time, and prioritizing patient comfort, these innovations play a pivotal role in achieving successful treatment outcomes while maintaining high standards of care for young patients.

Benefits of early orthodontic intervention with brackets for kids

In the realm pediatric orthodontics Light Cure Technologies have become indispensable tools for bonding processes due their efficiency speed precision They facilitate quick setting times allowing clinicians secure brackets archwires rapidly minimize chair time young patients who may struggle sitting still extended periods However incorporating these technologies into clinical practice requires careful consideration several practical aspects ensure optimal results equipment longevity Here we explore some key factors clinicians should keep mind when using light-cure technologies bonding procedures


Firstly technique plays crucial role determining bonding efficiency duration cure With pediatric patients movement can be challenge hence developing swift accurate method applying adhesive positioning bracket critical Clinicians should aim direct light beam perpendicularly towards bracket ensure uniform exposure Children's teeth often have more prominent curvatures convexities making precise placement even more important Additionally maintaining slight distance between light tip tooth surface usually recommended preventing heat buildup potential damage pulpal tissues


Moreover understanding characteristics different types dental resins vital achieving excellent bonds Selecting suitable resin based on its viscosity working time intensity required curing pivotal Aspects like shade opacity also influence curing dynamics darker shades may necessitate longer exposures higher intensities Similarly knowing intricacies specific light-curing units at hand allows orthodontists adjust settings according manufacturer guidelines desired outcomes


Equipment maintenance another significant aspect impact overall performance lifespan light cure devices Regular cleaning sterilization protocol essential preventing cross contamination ensuring patient safety Additionally periodic checks calibration should conducted verify units functioning correctly emitting adequate intensity range Typically LED units preferred due longer lifespans lower heat generation compared halogen counterparts Nevertheless irrespective type technology employed consistent monitoring output quality imperative maintaining high clinical standards protecting investments equipment Replacement bulbs batteries should readily available minimizing downtime during procedures Furthermore staff training paramount guarantee proper usage care prolong life equipment foster better outcomes treatments Keep staff updated latest developments manufacturer recommendations encourage smooth workflow clinic promote best practices bonding techniques In conclusion while light cure technologies offer tremendous advantages pediatric orthodontic bonding their successful integration clinical settings hinges upon meticulous attention detail regarding both operational techniques equipment upkeep Through mindful consideration these factors clinicians can enhance bonding efficiency provide superior care their young patients ultimately fostering positive treatment experiences

The role of parental support during orthodontic treatment with brackets

In the ever-evolving field of pediatric orthodontics, light cure technologies play a pivotal role in enhancing bonding efficiency and overall treatment outcomes. As we look to the future, several trends and advancements promise to further revolutionize this area, ensuring more effective and patient-friendly experiences.


One of the most promising trends is the development of advanced LED (Light Emitting Diode) curing lights. These next-generation devices are becoming increasingly popular due to their superior performance compared to traditional halogen lights. LED lights offer a more focused wavelength spectrum, which allows for faster and more efficient curing of adhesive materials. This not only reduces chair time for young patients but also ensures stronger bonds, minimizing the risk of bracket failure.


Another significant advancement is the integration of digital technology with light curing processes. Smart curing lights equipped with sensors and connected to software applications can provide real-time feedback on curing effectiveness. These devices can monitor the intensity and duration of light exposure, ensuring optimal bonding conditions for each tooth surface. Such precision can lead to better adhesion and durability, crucial factors for successful orthodontic treatment in growing patients.


The emergence of biocompatible adhesives with enhanced photo-polymerization properties is another exciting development. These new materials are designed to respond more effectively to light curing techniques, resulting in stronger bonds with less shrinkage. This innovation not only improves bonding efficiency but also reduces post-operative sensitivity, making the experience more comfortable for young patients.


Furthermore, research into nanotechnology is opening new possibilities for bonding materials. Nanoparticles incorporated into adhesives can enhance mechanical properties and improve light penetration during curing. This technology holds promise for creating stronger bonds at lower energy levels, potentially reducing heat generation and discomfort during treatment sessions.


Looking ahead, personalized medicine could also influence light cure technologies in pediatric orthodontics. Customized treatment plans based on individual patient needs could include tailored light curing protocols that account for variations in tooth enamel composition or sensitivity levels. This approach could optimize bonding outcomes while minimizing adverse effects on young patients' dentition.


In summary, future trends and advancements in light cure technologies hold immense potential for enhancing bonding efficiency and overall outcomes in pediatric orthodontics. From advanced LED curing lights to digital integration and nanotechnology applications, these innovations promise more effective treatments tailored to young patients' unique needs. As research continues to uncover new possibilities, we can anticipate even greater strides toward achieving optimal bonding solutions that prioritize both efficacy and patient comfort.

Orthodontics
Connecting the arch-wire on brackets with wire
Occupation
Names Orthodontist
Occupation type
Specialty
Activity sectors
Dentistry
Description
Education required
Dental degree, specialty training
Fields of
employment
Private practices, hospitals

Orthodontics[a][b] is a dentistry specialty that addresses the diagnosis, prevention, management, and correction of mal-positioned teeth and jaws, as well as misaligned bite patterns.[2] It may also address the modification of facial growth, known as dentofacial orthopedics.

Abnormal alignment of the teeth and jaws is very common. The approximate worldwide prevalence of malocclusion was as high as 56%.[3] However, conclusive scientific evidence for the health benefits of orthodontic treatment is lacking, although patients with completed treatment have reported a higher quality of life than that of untreated patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.[4][5] The main reason for the prevalence of these malocclusions is diets with less fresh fruit and vegetables and overall softer foods in childhood, causing smaller jaws with less room for the teeth to erupt.[6] Treatment may require several months to a few years and entails using dental braces and other appliances to gradually adjust tooth position and jaw alignment. In cases where the malocclusion is severe, jaw surgery may be incorporated into the treatment plan. Treatment usually begins before a person reaches adulthood, insofar as pre-adult bones may be adjusted more easily before adulthood.

History

[edit]

Though it was rare until the Industrial Revolution,[7] there is evidence of the issue of overcrowded, irregular, and protruding teeth afflicting individuals. Evidence from Greek and Etruscan materials suggests that attempts to treat this disorder date back to 1000 BC, showcasing primitive yet impressively well-crafted orthodontic appliances. In the 18th and 19th centuries, a range of devices for the "regulation" of teeth were described by various dentistry authors who occasionally put them into practice.[8] As a modern science, orthodontics dates back to the mid-1800s.[9] The field's influential contributors include Norman William Kingsley[9] (1829–1913) and Edward Angle[10] (1855–1930). Angle created the first basic system for classifying malocclusions, a system that remains in use today.[9]

Beginning in the mid-1800s, Norman Kingsley published Oral Deformities, which is now credited as one of the first works to begin systematically documenting orthodontics. Being a major presence in American dentistry during the latter half of the 19th century, not only was Kingsley one of the early users of extraoral force to correct protruding teeth, but he was also one of the pioneers for treating cleft palates and associated issues. During the era of orthodontics under Kingsley and his colleagues, the treatment was focused on straightening teeth and creating facial harmony. Ignoring occlusal relationships, it was typical to remove teeth for a variety of dental issues, such as malalignment or overcrowding. The concept of an intact dentition was not widely appreciated in those days, making bite correlations seem irrelevant.[8]

In the late 1800s, the concept of occlusion was essential for creating reliable prosthetic replacement teeth. This idea was further refined and ultimately applied in various ways when dealing with healthy dental structures as well. As these concepts of prosthetic occlusion progressed, it became an invaluable tool for dentistry.[8]

It was in 1890 that the work and impact of Dr. Edwards H. Angle began to be felt, with his contribution to modern orthodontics particularly noteworthy. Initially focused on prosthodontics, he taught in Pennsylvania and Minnesota before directing his attention towards dental occlusion and the treatments needed to maintain it as a normal condition, thus becoming known as the "father of modern orthodontics".[8]

By the beginning of the 20th century, orthodontics had become more than just the straightening of crooked teeth. The concept of ideal occlusion, as postulated by Angle and incorporated into a classification system, enabled a shift towards treating malocclusion, which is any deviation from normal occlusion.[8] Having a full set of teeth on both arches was highly sought after in orthodontic treatment due to the need for exact relationships between them. Extraction as an orthodontic procedure was heavily opposed by Angle and those who followed him. As occlusion became the key priority, facial proportions and aesthetics were neglected. To achieve ideal occlusals without using external forces, Angle postulated that having perfect occlusion was the best way to gain optimum facial aesthetics.[8]

With the passing of time, it became quite evident that even an exceptional occlusion was not suitable when considered from an aesthetic point of view. Not only were there issues related to aesthetics, but it usually proved impossible to keep a precise occlusal relationship achieved by forcing teeth together over extended durations with the use of robust elastics, something Angle and his students had previously suggested. Charles Tweed[11] in America and Raymond Begg[12] in Australia (who both studied under Angle) re-introduced dentistry extraction into orthodontics during the 1940s and 1950s so they could improve facial esthetics while also ensuring better stability concerning occlusal relationships.[13]

In the postwar period, cephalometric radiography[14] started to be used by orthodontists for measuring changes in tooth and jaw position caused by growth and treatment.[15] The x-rays showed that many Class II and III malocclusions were due to improper jaw relations as opposed to misaligned teeth. It became evident that orthodontic therapy could adjust mandibular development, leading to the formation of functional jaw orthopedics in Europe and extraoral force measures in the US. These days, both functional appliances and extraoral devices are applied around the globe with the aim of amending growth patterns and forms. Consequently, pursuing true, or at least improved, jaw relationships had become the main objective of treatment by the mid-20th century.[8]

At the beginning of the twentieth century, orthodontics was in need of an upgrade. The American Journal of Orthodontics was created for this purpose in 1915; before it, there were no scientific objectives to follow, nor any precise classification system and brackets that lacked features.[16]

Until the mid-1970s, braces were made by wrapping metal around each tooth.[9] With advancements in adhesives, it became possible to instead bond metal brackets to the teeth.[9]

In 1972, Lawrence F. Andrews gave an insightful definition of the ideal occlusion in permanent teeth. This has had meaningful effects on orthodontic treatments that are administered regularly,[16] and these are: 1. Correct interarchal relationships 2. Correct crown angulation (tip) 3. Correct crown inclination (torque) 4. No rotations 5. Tight contact points 6. Flat Curve of Spee (0.0–2.5 mm),[17] and based on these principles, he discovered a treatment system called the straight-wire appliance system, or the pre-adjusted edgewise system. Introduced in 1976, Larry Andrews' pre-adjusted edgewise appliance, more commonly known as the straight wire appliance, has since revolutionized fixed orthodontic treatment. The advantage of the design lies in its bracket and archwire combination, which requires only minimal wire bending from the orthodontist or clinician. It's aptly named after this feature: the angle of the slot and thickness of the bracket base ultimately determine where each tooth is situated with little need for extra manipulation.[18][19][20]

Prior to the invention of a straight wire appliance, orthodontists were utilizing a non-programmed standard edgewise fixed appliance system, or Begg's pin and tube system. Both of these systems employed identical brackets for each tooth and necessitated the bending of an archwire in three planes for locating teeth in their desired positions, with these bends dictating ultimate placements.[18]

Evolution of the current orthodontic appliances

[edit]

When it comes to orthodontic appliances, they are divided into two types: removable and fixed. Removable appliances can be taken on and off by the patient as required. On the other hand, fixed appliances cannot be taken off as they remain bonded to the teeth during treatment.

Fixed appliances

[edit]

Fixed orthodontic appliances are predominantly derived from the edgewise appliance approach, which typically begins with round wires before transitioning to rectangular archwires for improving tooth alignment. These rectangluar wires promote precision in the positioning of teeth following initial treatment. In contrast to the Begg appliance, which was based solely on round wires and auxiliary springs, the Tip-Edge system emerged in the early 21st century. This innovative technology allowed for the utilization of rectangular archwires to precisely control tooth movement during the finishing stages after initial treatment with round wires. Thus, almost all modern fixed appliances can be considered variations on this edgewise appliance system.

Early 20th-century orthodontist Edward Angle made a major contribution to the world of dentistry. He created four distinct appliance systems that have been used as the basis for many orthodontic treatments today, barring a few exceptions. They are E-arch, pin and tube, ribbon arch, and edgewise systems.

E-arch

[edit]

Edward H. Angle made a significant contribution to the dental field when he released the 7th edition of his book in 1907, which outlined his theories and detailed his technique. This approach was founded upon the iconic "E-Arch" or 'the-arch' shape as well as inter-maxillary elastics.[21] This device was different from any other appliance of its period as it featured a rigid framework to which teeth could be tied effectively in order to recreate an arch form that followed pre-defined dimensions.[22] Molars were fitted with braces, and a powerful labial archwire was positioned around the arch. The wire ended in a thread, and to move it forward, an adjustable nut was used, which allowed for an increase in circumference. By ligation, each individual tooth was attached to this expansive archwire.[8]

Pin and tube appliance

[edit]

Due to its limited range of motion, Angle was unable to achieve precise tooth positioning with an E-arch. In order to bypass this issue, he started using bands on other teeth combined with a vertical tube for each individual tooth. These tubes held a soldered pin, which could be repositioned at each appointment in order to move them in place.[8] Dubbed the "bone-growing appliance", this contraption was theorized to encourage healthier bone growth due to its potential for transferring force directly to the roots.[23] However, implementing it proved troublesome in reality.

Ribbon arch

[edit]

Realizing that the pin and tube appliance was not easy to control, Angle developed a better option, the ribbon arch, which was much simpler to use. Most of its components were already prepared by the manufacturer, so it was significantly easier to manage than before. In order to attach the ribbon arch, the occlusal area of the bracket was opened. Brackets were only added to eight incisors and mandibular canines, as it would be impossible to insert the arch into both horizontal molar tubes and the vertical brackets of adjacent premolars. This lack of understanding posed a considerable challenge to dental professionals; they were unable to make corrections to an excessive Spee curve in bicuspid teeth.[24] Despite the complexity of the situation, it was necessary for practitioners to find a resolution. Unparalleled to its counterparts, what made the ribbon arch instantly popular was that its archwire had remarkable spring qualities and could be utilized to accurately align teeth that were misaligned. However, a major drawback of this device was its inability to effectively control root position since it did not have enough resilience to generate the torque movements required for setting roots in their new place.[8]

Edgewise appliance

[edit]

In an effort to rectify the issues with the ribbon arch, Angle shifted the orientation of its slot from vertical, instead making it horizontal. In addition, he swapped out the wire and replaced it with a precious metal wire that was rotated by 90 degrees in relation—henceforth known as Edgewise.[25] Following extensive trials, it was concluded that dimensions of 22 × 28 mils were optimal for obtaining excellent control over crown and root positioning across all three planes of space.[26] After debuting in 1928, this appliance quickly became one of the mainstays for multibanded fixed therapy, although ribbon arches continued to be utilized for another decade or so beyond this point too.[8]

Labiolingual

[edit]

Prior to Angle, the idea of fitting attachments on individual teeth had not been thought of, and in his lifetime, his concern for precisely positioning each tooth was not highly appraised. In addition to using fingersprings for repositioning teeth with a range of removable devices, two main appliance systems were very popular in the early part of the 20th century. Labiolingual appliances use bands on the first molars joined with heavy lingual and labial archwires affixed with soldered fingersprings to shift single teeth.

Twin wire

[edit]

Utilizing bands around both incisors and molars, a twin-wire appliance was designed to provide alignment between these teeth. Constructed with two 10-mil steel archwires, its delicate features were safeguarded by lengthy tubes stretching from molars towards canines. Despite its efforts, it had limited capacity for movement without further modifications, rendering it obsolete in modern orthodontic practice.

Begg's Appliance

[edit]

Returning to Australia in the 1920s, the renowned orthodontist, Raymond Begg, applied his knowledge of ribbon arch appliances, which he had learned from the Angle School. On top of this, Begg recognized that extracting teeth was sometimes vital for successful outcomes and sought to modify the ribbon arch appliance to provide more control when dealing with root positioning. In the late 1930s, Begg developed his adaptation of the appliance, which took three forms. Firstly, a high-strength 16-mil round stainless steel wire replaced the original precious metal ribbon arch. Secondly, he kept the same ribbon arch bracket but inverted it so that it pointed toward the gums instead of away from them. Lastly, auxiliary springs were added to control root movement. This resulted in what would come to be known as the Begg Appliance. With this design, friction was decreased since contact between wire and bracket was minimal, and binding was minimized due to tipping and uprighting being used for anchorage control, which lessened contact angles between wires and corners of the bracket.

Tip-Edge System

[edit]

Begg's influence is still seen in modern appliances, such as Tip-Edge brackets. This type of bracket incorporates a rectangular slot cutaway on one side to allow for crown tipping with no incisal deflection of an archwire, allowing teeth to be tipped during space closure and then uprighted through auxiliary springs or even a rectangular wire for torque purposes in finishing. At the initial stages of treatment, small-diameter steel archwires should be used when working with Tip-Edge brackets.

Contemporary edgewise systems

[edit]

Throughout time, there has been a shift in which appliances are favored by dentists. In particular, during the 1960s, when it was introduced, the Begg appliance gained wide popularity due to its efficiency compared to edgewise appliances of that era; it could produce the same results with less investment on the dentist's part. Nevertheless, since then, there have been advances in technology and sophistication in edgewise appliances, which led to the opposite conclusion: nowadays, edgewise appliances are more efficient than the Begg appliance, thus explaining why it is commonly used.

Automatic rotational control

[edit]

At the beginning, Angle attached eyelets to the edges of archwires so that they could be held with ligatures and help manage rotations. Now, however, no extra ligature is needed due to either twin brackets or single brackets that have added wings touching underneath the wire (Lewis or Lang brackets). Both types of brackets simplify the process of obtaining moments that control movements along a particular plane of space.

Alteration in bracket slot dimensions

[edit]

In modern dentistry, two types of edgewise appliances exist: the 18- and 22-slot varieties. While these appliances are used differently, the introduction of a 20-slot device with more precise features has been considered but not pursued yet.[27]

Straight-wire bracket prescriptions

[edit]

Rather than rely on the same bracket for all teeth, L.F. Andrews found a way to make different brackets for each tooth in the 1980s, thanks to the increased convenience of bonding.[28] This adjustment enabled him to avoid having multiple bends in archwires that would have been needed to make up for variations in tooth anatomy. Ultimately, this led to what was termed a "straight-wire appliance" system – an edgewise appliance that greatly enhanced its efficiency.[29] The modern edgewise appliance has slightly different construction than the original one. Instead of relying on faciolingual bends to accommodate variations among teeth, each bracket has a correspondingly varying base thickness depending on the tooth it is intended for. However, due to individual differences between teeth, this does not completely eliminate the need for compensating bends.[30] Accurately placing the roots of many teeth requires angling brackets in relation to the long axis of the tooth. Traditionally, this mesiodistal root positioning necessitated using second-order, or tip, bends along the archwire. However, angling the bracket or bracket slot eliminates this need for bends.

Given the discrepancies in inclination of facial surfaces across individual teeth, placing a twist, otherwise known as third-order or torque bends, into segments of each rectangular archwire was initially required with the edgewise appliance. These bends were necessary for all patients and wires, not just to avoid any unintentional movement of suitably placed teeth or when moving roots facially or lingually. Angulation of either brackets or slots can minimize the need for second-order or tip bends on archwires. Contemporary edgewise appliances come with brackets designed to adjust for any facial inclinations, thereby eliminating or reducing any third-order bends. These brackets already have angulation and torque values built in so that each rectangluar archwire can be contorted to form a custom fit without inadvertently shifting any correctly positioned teeth. Without bracket angulation and torque, second-order or tip bends would still be required on each patient's archwire.

Methods

[edit]
Upper and lower jaw functional expanders

A typical treatment for incorrectly positioned teeth (malocclusion) takes from one to two years, with braces being adjusted every four to 10 weeks by orthodontists,[31] while university-trained dental specialists are versed in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of dental and facial irregularities. Orthodontists offer a wide range of treatment options to straighten crooked teeth, fix irregular bites, and align the jaws correctly.[32] There are many ways to adjust malocclusion. In growing patients, there are more options to treat skeletal discrepancies, either by promoting or restricting growth using functional appliances, orthodontic headgear, or a reverse pull facemask. Most orthodontic work begins in the early permanent dentition stage before skeletal growth is completed. If skeletal growth has completed, jaw surgery is an option. Sometimes teeth are extracted to aid the orthodontic treatment (teeth are extracted in about half of all the cases, most commonly the premolars).[33]

Orthodontic therapy may include the use of fixed or removable appliances. Most orthodontic therapy is delivered using appliances that are fixed in place,[34] for example, braces that are adhesively bonded to the teeth. Fixed appliances may provide greater mechanical control of the teeth; optimal treatment outcomes are improved by using fixed appliances.

Fixed appliances may be used, for example, to rotate teeth if they do not fit the arch shape of the other teeth in the mouth, to adjust multiple teeth to different places, to change the tooth angle of teeth, or to change the position of a tooth's root. This treatment course is not preferred where a patient has poor oral hygiene, as decalcification, tooth decay, or other complications may result. If a patient is unmotivated (insofar as treatment takes several months and requires commitment to oral hygiene), or if malocclusions are mild.

The biology of tooth movement and how advances in gene therapy and molecular biology technology may shape the future of orthodontic treatment.[35]

Braces

[edit]
Dental braces

Braces are usually placed on the front side of the teeth, but they may also be placed on the side facing the tongue (called lingual braces). Brackets made out of stainless steel or porcelain are bonded to the center of the teeth using an adhesive. Wires are placed in a slot in the brackets, which allows for controlled movement in all three dimensions.

Apart from wires, forces can be applied using elastic bands,[36] and springs may be used to push teeth apart or to close a gap. Several teeth may be tied together with ligatures, and different kinds of hooks can be placed to allow for connecting an elastic band.[37][36]

Clear aligners are an alternative to braces, but insufficient evidence exists to determine their effectiveness.[38]

Treatment duration

[edit]

The time required for braces varies from person to person as it depends on the severity of the problem, the amount of room available, the distance the teeth must travel, the health of the teeth, gums, and supporting bone, and how closely the patient follows instructions. On average, however, once the braces are put on, they usually remain in place for one to three years. After braces are removed, most patients will need to wear a retainer all the time for the first six months, then only during sleep for many years.[39]

Headgear

[edit]

Orthodontic headgear, sometimes referred to as an "extra-oral appliance", is a treatment approach that requires the patient to have a device strapped onto their head to help correct malocclusion—typically used when the teeth do not align properly. Headgear is most often used along with braces or other orthodontic appliances. While braces correct the position of teeth, orthodontic headgear—which, as the name suggests, is worn on or strapped onto the patient's head—is most often added to orthodontic treatment to help alter the alignment of the jaw, although there are some situations in which such an appliance can help move teeth, particularly molars.

Full orthodontic headgear with headcap, fitting straps, facebow, and elastics

Whatever the purpose, orthodontic headgear works by exerting tension on the braces via hooks, a facebow, coils, elastic bands, metal orthodontic bands, and other attachable appliances directly into the patient's mouth. It is most effective for children and teenagers because their jaws are still developing and can be easily manipulated. (If an adult is fitted with headgear, it is usually to help correct the position of teeth that have shifted after other teeth have been extracted.) Thus, headgear is typically used to treat a number of jaw alignment or bite problems, such as overbite and underbite.[40]

Palatal expansion

[edit]

Palatal expansion can be best achieved using a fixed tissue-borne appliance. Removable appliances can push teeth outward but are less effective at maxillary sutural expansion. The effects of a removable expander may look the same as they push teeth outward, but they should not be confused with actually expanding the palate. Proper palate expansion can create more space for teeth as well as improve both oral and nasal airflow.[41]

Jaw surgery

[edit]

Jaw surgery may be required to fix severe malocclusions.[42] The bone is broken during surgery and stabilized with titanium (or bioresorbable) plates and screws to allow for healing to take place.[43] After surgery, regular orthodontic treatment is used to move the teeth into their final position.[44]

During treatment

[edit]

To reduce pain during the orthodontic treatment, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), vibratory devices, chewing adjuncts, brainwave music, or cognitive behavioral therapy can be used. However, the supporting evidence is of low quality, and the results are inconclusive.[45]

Post treatment

[edit]

After orthodontic treatment has been completed, there is a tendency for teeth to return, or relapse, back to their pre-treatment positions. Over 50% of patients have some reversion to pre-treatment positions within 10 years following treatment.[46] To prevent relapse, the majority of patients will be offered a retainer once treatment has been completed and will benefit from wearing their retainers. Retainers can be either fixed or removable.

Removable retainers

[edit]

Removable retainers are made from clear plastic, and they are custom-fitted for the patient's mouth. It has a tight fit and holds all of the teeth in position. There are many types of brands for clear retainers, including Zendura Retainer, Essix Retainer, and Vivera Retainer.[47] A Hawley retainer is also a removable orthodontic appliance made from a combination of plastic and metal that is custom-molded to fit the patient's mouth. Removable retainers will be worn for different periods of time, depending on the patient's need to stabilize the dentition.[48]

Fixed retainers

[edit]

Fixed retainers are a simple wire fixed to the tongue-facing part of the incisors using dental adhesive and can be specifically useful to prevent rotation in incisors. Other types of fixed retainers can include labial or lingual braces, with brackets fixed to the teeth.[48]

Clear aligners

[edit]

Clear aligners are another form of orthodontics commonly used today, involving removable plastic trays. There has been controversy about the effectiveness of aligners such as Invisalign or Byte; some consider them to be faster and more freeing than the alternatives.[49]

Training

[edit]

There are several specialty areas in dentistry, but the specialty of orthodontics was the first to be recognized within dentistry.[50] Specifically, the American Dental Association recognized orthodontics as a specialty in the 1950s.[50] Each country has its own system for training and registering orthodontic specialists.

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, to obtain an accredited three-year full-time university degree in orthodontics, one will need to be a qualified dentist (complete an AHPRA-registered general dental degree) with a minimum of two years of clinical experience. There are several universities in Australia that offer orthodontic programs: the University of Adelaide, the University of Melbourne, the University of Sydney, the University of Queensland, the University of Western Australia, and the University of Otago.[51] Orthodontic courses are accredited by the Australian Dental Council and reviewed by the Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO). Prospective applicants should obtain information from the relevant institution before applying for admission.[52] After completing a degree in orthodontics, specialists are required to be registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in order to practice.[53][54]

Bangladesh

[edit]

Dhaka Dental College in Bangladesh is one of the many schools recognized by the Bangladesh Medical and Dental Council (BM&DC) that offer post-graduation orthodontic courses.[55][56] Before applying to any post-graduation training courses, an applicant must have completed the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) examination from any dental college.[55] After application, the applicant must take an admissions test held by the specific college.[55] If successful, selected candidates undergo training for six months.[57]

Canada

[edit]

In Canada, obtaining a dental degree, such as a Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) or Doctor of Medical Dentistry (DMD), would be required before being accepted by a school for orthodontic training.[58] Currently, there are 10 schools in the country offering the orthodontic specialty.[58] Candidates should contact the individual school directly to obtain the most recent pre-requisites before entry.[58] The Canadian Dental Association expects orthodontists to complete at least two years of post-doctoral, specialty training in orthodontics in an accredited program after graduating from their dental degree.

United States

[edit]

Similar to Canada, there are several colleges and universities in the United States that offer orthodontic programs. Every school has a different enrollment process, but every applicant is required to have graduated with a DDS or DMD from an accredited dental school.[59][60] Entrance into an accredited orthodontics program is extremely competitive and begins by passing a national or state licensing exam.[61]

The program generally lasts for two to three years, and by the final year, graduates are required to complete the written American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) exam.[61] This exam is also broken down into two components: a written exam and a clinical exam.[61] The written exam is a comprehensive exam that tests for the applicant's knowledge of basic sciences and clinical concepts.[61] The clinical exam, however, consists of a Board Case Oral Examination (BCOE), a Case Report Examination (CRE), and a Case Report Oral Examination (CROE).[61] Once certified, certification must then be renewed every ten years.[61] Orthodontic programs can award a Master of Science degree, a Doctor of Science degree, or a Doctor of Philosophy degree, depending on the school and individual research requirements.[62]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Throughout the United Kingdom, there are several Orthodontic Specialty Training Registrar posts available.[63] The program is full-time for three years, and upon completion, trainees graduate with a degree at the Masters or Doctorate level.[63] Training may take place within hospital departments that are linked to recognized dental schools.[63] Obtaining a Certificate of Completion of Specialty Training (CCST) allows an orthodontic specialist to be registered under the General Dental Council (GDC).[63] An orthodontic specialist can provide care within a primary care setting, but to work at a hospital as an orthodontic consultant, higher-level training is further required as a post-CCST trainee.[63] To work within a university setting as an academic consultant, completing research toward obtaining a Ph.D. is also required.[63]

See also

[edit]
  • Orthodontic technology
  • Orthodontic indices
  • List of orthodontic functional appliances
  • Molar distalization
  • Mouth breathing
  • Obligate nasal breathing

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Also referred to as orthodontia
  2. ^ "Orthodontics" comes from the Greek orthos ('correct, straight') and -odont- ('tooth').[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Definition of orthodontics | Dictionary.com". www.dictionary.com. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  2. ^ "What is orthodontics?// Useful Resources: FAQ and Downloadable eBooks". Orthodontics Australia. Retrieved 2020-08-13.
  3. ^ Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, Colombo S, Orso M, Cianetti S (June 2020). "Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Eur J Paediatr Dent. 21 (2): 115–22. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05. PMID 32567942.
  4. ^ Whitcomb I (2020-07-20). "Evidence and Orthodontics: Does Your Child Really Need Braces?". Undark Magazine. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
  5. ^ "Controversial report finds no proof that dental braces work". British Dental Journal. 226 (2): 91. 2019-01-01. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.65. ISSN 1476-5373. S2CID 59222957.
  6. ^ von Cramon-Taubadel N (December 2011). "Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (49): 19546–19551. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10819546V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113050108. PMC 3241821. PMID 22106280.
  7. ^ Rose, Jerome C.; Roblee, Richard D. (June 2009). "Origins of dental crowding and malocclusions: an anthropological perspective". Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995). 30 (5): 292–300. ISSN 1548-8578. PMID 19514263.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM (2019). Contemporary orthodontics (Sixth ed.). Philadelphia, PA. ISBN 978-0-323-54387-3. OCLC 1089435881.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  9. ^ a b c d e "A Brief History of Orthodontic Braces – ArchWired". www.archwired.com. 17 July 2019.[self-published source]
  10. ^ Peck S (November 2009). "A biographical portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the first specialist in orthodontics, part 1". The Angle Orthodontist. 79 (6): 1021–1027. doi:10.2319/021009-93.1. PMID 19852589.
  11. ^ "The Application of the Principles of the Edge- wise Arch in the Treatment of Malocclusions: II.*". meridian.allenpress.com. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  12. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Museum and Archive > Collection > Fixed Appliances > Begg". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  13. ^ Safirstein D (August 2015). "P. Raymond Begg". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (2): 206. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.005. PMID 26232825.
  14. ^ Higley LB (August 1940). "Lateral head roentgenograms and their relation to the orthodontic problem". American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 26 (8): 768–778. doi:10.1016/S0096-6347(40)90331-3. ISSN 0096-6347.
  15. ^ Themes UF (2015-01-12). "14: Cephalometric radiography". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  16. ^ a b Andrews LF (December 2015). "The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy: Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (6): 883–887. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.011. PMID 26672688.
  17. ^ Andrews LF (September 1972). "The six keys to normal occlusion". American Journal of Orthodontics. 62 (3): 296–309. doi:10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0. PMID 4505873. S2CID 8039883.
  18. ^ a b Themes UF (2015-01-01). "31 The straight wire appliance". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  19. ^ Andrews LF (July 1979). "The straight-wire appliance". British Journal of Orthodontics. 6 (3): 125–143. doi:10.1179/bjo.6.3.125. PMID 297458. S2CID 33259729.
  20. ^ Phulari B (2013), "Andrews' Straight Wire Appliance", History of Orthodontics, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., p. 98, doi:10.5005/jp/books/12065_11, ISBN 9789350904718, retrieved 2023-02-07
  21. ^ Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th éd. Philadelphia: S.S.White Dental Mfg Cy, 1907
  22. ^ Philippe J (March 2008). "How, why, and when was the edgewise appliance born?". Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics. 11 (1): 68–74. doi:10.1051/odfen/20084210113. ISSN 2110-5715.
  23. ^ Angle EH (1912). "Evolution of orthodontia. Recent developments". Dental Cosmos. 54: 853–867.
  24. ^ Brodie AG (1931). "A discussion on the Newest Angle Mechanism". The Angle Orthodontist. 1: 32–38.
  25. ^ Angle EH (1928). "The latest and best in Orthodontic Mechanism". Dental Cosmos. 70: 1143–1156.
  26. ^ Brodie AG (1956). "Orthodontic Concepts Prior to the Death of Edward Angle". The Angle Orthodontist. 26: 144–155.
  27. ^ Matasa CG, Graber TM (April 2000). "Angle, the innovator, mechanical genius, and clinician". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 117 (4): 444–452. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70164-8. PMID 10756270.
  28. ^ Andrews LF. Straight Wire: The Concept and Appliance. San Diego: LA Wells; 1989.
  29. ^ Andrews LF (1989). Straight wire: the concept and appliance. Lisa Schirmer. San Diego, CA. ISBN 978-0-9616256-0-3. OCLC 22808470.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. ^ Roth RH (November 1976). "Five year clinical evaluation of the Andrews straight-wire appliance". Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 10 (11): 836–50. PMID 1069735.
  31. ^ Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (June 2015). "Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: CD010572. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010572. PMC 6464946. PMID 26123284.
  32. ^ "What is an Orthodontist?". Orthodontics Australia. 5 December 2019.
  33. ^ Dardengo C, Fernandes LQ, Capelli Júnior J (February 2016). "Frequency of orthodontic extraction". Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 21 (1): 54–59. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar. PMC 4816586. PMID 27007762.
  34. ^ "Child Dental Health Survey 2013, England, Wales and Northern Ireland". digital.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  35. ^ Atsawasuwan P, Shirazi S (2019-04-10). "Advances in Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology Aspect". In Aslan BI, Uzuner FD (eds.). Current Approaches in Orthodontics. IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.80287. ISBN 978-1-78985-181-6. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
  36. ^ a b "Elastics For Braces: Rubber Bands in Orthodontics". Orthodontics Australia. 2019-12-15. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  37. ^ Mitchell L (2013). An Introduction to Orthodontics. Oxford Medical Publications. pp. 220–233.
  38. ^ Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (September 2015). "Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review". The Angle Orthodontist. 85 (5): 881–889. doi:10.2319/061614-436.1. PMC 8610387. PMID 25412265. S2CID 10787375. The quality level of the studies was not sufficient to draw any evidence-based conclusions.
  39. ^ "Dental Braces and Retainers".
  40. ^ Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (February 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD005972. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub4. PMC 6491166. PMID 29390172.
  41. ^ "Palate Expander". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
  42. ^ "Jaw Surgery". Modern Orthodontic Clinic in Sammamish & Bellevue. Retrieved 2024-10-03.
  43. ^ Agnihotry A, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Gill KS, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (October 2017). Zbigniew F (ed.). "Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 10 (10). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: CD006204. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006204. PMC 6485457. PMID 28977689.
  44. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Public & Patients > Your Jaw Surgery". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  45. ^ Fleming PS, Strydom H, Katsaros C, MacDonald L, Curatolo M, Fudalej P, Pandis N, et al. (Cochrane Oral Health Group) (December 2016). "Non-pharmacological interventions for alleviating pain during orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 (12): CD010263. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010263.pub2. PMC 6463902. PMID 28009052.
  46. ^ Yu Y, Sun J, Lai W, Wu T, Koshy S, Shi Z (September 2013). "Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (9): CD008734. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008734.pub2. PMC 10793711. PMID 24014170.
  47. ^ "Clear Retainers | Maintain Your Hard to Get Smile with Clear Retainers". Retrieved 2020-01-13.
  48. ^ a b Martin C, Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington HV, Limones A (May 2023). "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023 (5): CD002283. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5. PMC 10202160. PMID 37219527.
  49. ^ Putrino A, Barbato E, Galluccio G (March 2021). "Clear Aligners: Between Evolution and Efficiency-A Scoping Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (6): 2870. doi:10.3390/ijerph18062870. PMC 7998651. PMID 33799682.
  50. ^ a b Christensen GJ (March 2002). "Orthodontics and the general practitioner". Journal of the American Dental Association. 133 (3): 369–371. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0178. PMID 11934193.
  51. ^ "How to become an orthodontist". Orthodontics Australia. 26 September 2017.
  52. ^ "Studying orthodontics". Australian Society of Orthodontists. 26 September 2017.
  53. ^ "Specialties and Specialty Fields". Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency.
  54. ^ "Medical Specialties and Specialty Fields". Medical Board of Australia.
  55. ^ a b c "Dhaka Dental College". Dhaka Dental College. Archived from the original on October 28, 2017. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  56. ^ "List of recognized medical and dental colleges". Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council (BM&DC). Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  57. ^ "Orthodontic Facts - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  58. ^ a b c "FAQ: I Want To Be An Orthodontist - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  59. ^ "RCDC - Eligibility". The Royal College of Dentists of Canada. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  60. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs - AAO Members". www.aaoinfo.org.
  61. ^ a b c d e f "About Board Certification". American Board of Orthodontists. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  62. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs | AAO Members". American Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  63. ^ a b c d e f "Orthodontic Specialty Training in the UK" (PDF). British Orthodontic Society. Retrieved 28 October 2017.

 

Redirect to:

  • Tooth decay
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.

 

Pediatrics
A pediatrician examines a neonate.
Focus Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
Subdivisions Paediatric cardiology, neonatology, critical care, pediatric oncology, hospital medicine, primary care, others (see below)
Significant diseases Congenital diseases, Infectious diseases, Childhood cancer, Mental disorders
Significant tests World Health Organization Child Growth Standards
Specialist Pediatrician
Glossary Glossary of medicine

Pediatrics (American English) also spelled paediatrics (British English), is the branch of medicine that involves the medical care of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. In the United Kingdom, pediatrics covers many of their youth until the age of 18.[1] The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends people seek pediatric care through the age of 21, but some pediatric subspecialists continue to care for adults up to 25.[2][3] Worldwide age limits of pediatrics have been trending upward year after year.[4] A medical doctor who specializes in this area is known as a pediatrician, or paediatrician. The word pediatrics and its cognates mean "healer of children", derived from the two Greek words: παá¿–ς (pais "child") and á¼°ατρÏŒς (iatros "doctor, healer"). Pediatricians work in clinics, research centers, universities, general hospitals and children's hospitals, including those who practice pediatric subspecialties (e.g. neonatology requires resources available in a NICU).

History

[edit]
Part of Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, United Kingdom, which was the first pediatric hospital in the English-speaking world.

The earliest mentions of child-specific medical problems appear in the Hippocratic Corpus, published in the fifth century B.C., and the famous Sacred Disease. These publications discussed topics such as childhood epilepsy and premature births. From the first to fourth centuries A.D., Greek philosophers and physicians Celsus, Soranus of Ephesus, Aretaeus, Galen, and Oribasius, also discussed specific illnesses affecting children in their works, such as rashes, epilepsy, and meningitis.[5] Already Hippocrates, Aristotle, Celsus, Soranus, and Galen[6] understood the differences in growing and maturing organisms that necessitated different treatment: Ex toto non sic pueri ut viri curari debent ("In general, boys should not be treated in the same way as men").[7] Some of the oldest traces of pediatrics can be discovered in Ancient India where children's doctors were called kumara bhrtya.[6]

Even though some pediatric works existed during this time, they were scarce and rarely published due to a lack of knowledge in pediatric medicine. Sushruta Samhita, an ayurvedic text composed during the sixth century BCE, contains the text about pediatrics.[8] Another ayurvedic text from this period is Kashyapa Samhita.[9][10] A second century AD manuscript by the Greek physician and gynecologist Soranus of Ephesus dealt with neonatal pediatrics.[11] Byzantine physicians Oribasius, Aëtius of Amida, Alexander Trallianus, and Paulus Aegineta contributed to the field.[6] The Byzantines also built brephotrophia (crêches).[6] Islamic Golden Age writers served as a bridge for Greco-Roman and Byzantine medicine and added ideas of their own, especially Haly Abbas, Yahya Serapion, Abulcasis, Avicenna, and Averroes. The Persian philosopher and physician al-Razi (865–925), sometimes called the father of pediatrics, published a monograph on pediatrics titled Diseases in Children.[12][13] Also among the first books about pediatrics was Libellus [Opusculum] de aegritudinibus et remediis infantium 1472 ("Little Book on Children Diseases and Treatment"), by the Italian pediatrician Paolo Bagellardo.[14][5] In sequence came Bartholomäus Metlinger's Ein Regiment der Jungerkinder 1473, Cornelius Roelans (1450–1525) no title Buchlein, or Latin compendium, 1483, and Heinrich von Louffenburg (1391–1460) Versehung des Leibs written in 1429 (published 1491), together form the Pediatric Incunabula, four great medical treatises on children's physiology and pathology.[6]

While more information about childhood diseases became available, there was little evidence that children received the same kind of medical care that adults did.[15] It was during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries that medical experts started offering specialized care for children.[5] The Swedish physician Nils Rosén von Rosenstein (1706–1773) is considered to be the founder of modern pediatrics as a medical specialty,[16][17] while his work The diseases of children, and their remedies (1764) is considered to be "the first modern textbook on the subject".[18] However, it was not until the nineteenth century that medical professionals acknowledged pediatrics as a separate field of medicine. The first pediatric-specific publications appeared between the 1790s and the 1920s.[19]

Etymology

[edit]

The term pediatrics was first introduced in English in 1859 by Abraham Jacobi. In 1860, he became "the first dedicated professor of pediatrics in the world."[20] Jacobi is known as the father of American pediatrics because of his many contributions to the field.[21][22] He received his medical training in Germany and later practiced in New York City.[23]

The first generally accepted pediatric hospital is the Hôpital des Enfants Malades (French: Hospital for Sick Children), which opened in Paris in June 1802 on the site of a previous orphanage.[24] From its beginning, this famous hospital accepted patients up to the age of fifteen years,[25] and it continues to this day as the pediatric division of the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, created in 1920 by merging with the nearby Necker Hospital, founded in 1778.[26]

In other European countries, the Charité (a hospital founded in 1710) in Berlin established a separate Pediatric Pavilion in 1830, followed by similar institutions at Saint Petersburg in 1834, and at Vienna and Breslau (now WrocÅ‚aw), both in 1837. In 1852 Britain's first pediatric hospital, the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street was founded by Charles West.[24] The first Children's hospital in Scotland opened in 1860 in Edinburgh.[27] In the US, the first similar institutions were the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, which opened in 1855, and then Boston Children's Hospital (1869).[28] Subspecialties in pediatrics were created at the Harriet Lane Home at Johns Hopkins by Edwards A. Park.[29]

Differences between adult and pediatric medicine

[edit]

The body size differences are paralleled by maturation changes. The smaller body of an infant or neonate is substantially different physiologically from that of an adult. Congenital defects, genetic variance, and developmental issues are of greater concern to pediatricians than they often are to adult physicians. A common adage is that children are not simply "little adults". The clinician must take into account the immature physiology of the infant or child when considering symptoms, prescribing medications, and diagnosing illnesses.[30]

Pediatric physiology directly impacts the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs that enter the body. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of medications differ between developing children and grown adults.[30][31][32] Despite completed studies and reviews, continual research is needed to better understand how these factors should affect the decisions of healthcare providers when prescribing and administering medications to the pediatric population.[30]

Absorption

[edit]

Many drug absorption differences between pediatric and adult populations revolve around the stomach. Neonates and young infants have increased stomach pH due to decreased acid secretion, thereby creating a more basic environment for drugs that are taken by mouth.[31][30][32] Acid is essential to degrading certain oral drugs before systemic absorption. Therefore, the absorption of these drugs in children is greater than in adults due to decreased breakdown and increased preservation in a less acidic gastric space.[31]

Children also have an extended rate of gastric emptying, which slows the rate of drug absorption.[31][32]

Drug absorption also depends on specific enzymes that come in contact with the oral drug as it travels through the body. Supply of these enzymes increase as children continue to develop their gastrointestinal tract.[31][32] Pediatric patients have underdeveloped proteins, which leads to decreased metabolism and increased serum concentrations of specific drugs. However, prodrugs experience the opposite effect because enzymes are necessary for allowing their active form to enter systemic circulation.[31]

Distribution

[edit]

Percentage of total body water and extracellular fluid volume both decrease as children grow and develop with time. Pediatric patients thus have a larger volume of distribution than adults, which directly affects the dosing of hydrophilic drugs such as beta-lactam antibiotics like ampicillin.[31] Thus, these drugs are administered at greater weight-based doses or with adjusted dosing intervals in children to account for this key difference in body composition.[31][30]

Infants and neonates also have fewer plasma proteins. Thus, highly protein-bound drugs have fewer opportunities for protein binding, leading to increased distribution.[30]

Metabolism

[edit]

Drug metabolism primarily occurs via enzymes in the liver and can vary according to which specific enzymes are affected in a specific stage of development.[31] Phase I and Phase II enzymes have different rates of maturation and development, depending on their specific mechanism of action (i.e. oxidation, hydrolysis, acetylation, methylation, etc.). Enzyme capacity, clearance, and half-life are all factors that contribute to metabolism differences between children and adults.[31][32] Drug metabolism can even differ within the pediatric population, separating neonates and infants from young children.[30]

Elimination

[edit]

Drug elimination is primarily facilitated via the liver and kidneys.[31] In infants and young children, the larger relative size of their kidneys leads to increased renal clearance of medications that are eliminated through urine.[32] In preterm neonates and infants, their kidneys are slower to mature and thus are unable to clear as much drug as fully developed kidneys. This can cause unwanted drug build-up, which is why it is important to consider lower doses and greater dosing intervals for this population.[30][31] Diseases that negatively affect kidney function can also have the same effect and thus warrant similar considerations.[31]

Pediatric autonomy in healthcare

[edit]

A major difference between the practice of pediatric and adult medicine is that children, in most jurisdictions and with certain exceptions, cannot make decisions for themselves. The issues of guardianship, privacy, legal responsibility, and informed consent must always be considered in every pediatric procedure. Pediatricians often have to treat the parents and sometimes, the family, rather than just the child. Adolescents are in their own legal class, having rights to their own health care decisions in certain circumstances. The concept of legal consent combined with the non-legal consent (assent) of the child when considering treatment options, especially in the face of conditions with poor prognosis or complicated and painful procedures/surgeries, means the pediatrician must take into account the desires of many people, in addition to those of the patient.[citation needed]

History of pediatric autonomy

[edit]

The term autonomy is traceable to ethical theory and law, where it states that autonomous individuals can make decisions based on their own logic.[33] Hippocrates was the first to use the term in a medical setting. He created a code of ethics for doctors called the Hippocratic Oath that highlighted the importance of putting patients' interests first, making autonomy for patients a top priority in health care.[34]  

In ancient times, society did not view pediatric medicine as essential or scientific.[35] Experts considered professional medicine unsuitable for treating children. Children also had no rights. Fathers regarded their children as property, so their children's health decisions were entrusted to them.[5] As a result, mothers, midwives, "wise women", and general practitioners treated the children instead of doctors.[35] Since mothers could not rely on professional medicine to take care of their children, they developed their own methods, such as using alkaline soda ash to remove the vernix at birth and treating teething pain with opium or wine. The absence of proper pediatric care, rights, and laws in health care to prioritize children's health led to many of their deaths. Ancient Greeks and Romans sometimes even killed healthy female babies and infants with deformities since they had no adequate medical treatment and no laws prohibiting infanticide.[5]

In the twentieth century, medical experts began to put more emphasis on children's rights. In 1989, in the United Nations Rights of the Child Convention, medical experts developed the Best Interest Standard of Child to prioritize children's rights and best interests. This event marked the onset of pediatric autonomy. In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) finally acknowledged the Best Interest Standard of a Child as an ethical principle for pediatric decision-making, and it is still being used today.[34]

Parental authority and current medical issues

[edit]

The majority of the time, parents have the authority to decide what happens to their child. Philosopher John Locke argued that it is the responsibility of parents to raise their children and that God gave them this authority. In modern society, Jeffrey Blustein, modern philosopher and author of the book Parents and Children: The Ethics of Family, argues that parental authority is granted because the child requires parents to satisfy their needs. He believes that parental autonomy is more about parents providing good care for their children and treating them with respect than parents having rights.[36] The researcher Kyriakos Martakis, MD, MSc, explains that research shows parental influence negatively affects children's ability to form autonomy. However, involving children in the decision-making process allows children to develop their cognitive skills and create their own opinions and, thus, decisions about their health. Parental authority affects the degree of autonomy the child patient has. As a result, in Argentina, the new National Civil and Commercial Code has enacted various changes to the healthcare system to encourage children and adolescents to develop autonomy. It has become more crucial to let children take accountability for their own health decisions.[37]

In most cases, the pediatrician, parent, and child work as a team to make the best possible medical decision. The pediatrician has the right to intervene for the child's welfare and seek advice from an ethics committee. However, in recent studies, authors have denied that complete autonomy is present in pediatric healthcare. The same moral standards should apply to children as they do to adults. In support of this idea is the concept of paternalism, which negates autonomy when it is in the patient's interests. This concept aims to keep the child's best interests in mind regarding autonomy. Pediatricians can interact with patients and help them make decisions that will benefit them, thus enhancing their autonomy. However, radical theories that question a child's moral worth continue to be debated today.[37] Authors often question whether the treatment and equality of a child and an adult should be the same. Author Tamar Schapiro notes that children need nurturing and cannot exercise the same level of authority as adults.[38] Hence, continuing the discussion on whether children are capable of making important health decisions until this day.

Modern advancements

[edit]

According to the Subcommittee of Clinical Ethics of the Argentinean Pediatric Society (SAP), children can understand moral feelings at all ages and can make reasonable decisions based on those feelings. Therefore, children and teens are deemed capable of making their own health decisions when they reach the age of 13. Recently, studies made on the decision-making of children have challenged that age to be 12.[37]

Technology has made several modern advancements that contribute to the future development of child autonomy, for example, unsolicited findings (U.F.s) of pediatric exome sequencing. They are findings based on pediatric exome sequencing that explain in greater detail the intellectual disability of a child and predict to what extent it will affect the child in the future. Genetic and intellectual disorders in children make them incapable of making moral decisions, so people look down upon this kind of testing because the child's future autonomy is at risk. It is still in question whether parents should request these types of testing for their children. Medical experts argue that it could endanger the autonomous rights the child will possess in the future. However, the parents contend that genetic testing would benefit the welfare of their children since it would allow them to make better health care decisions.[39] Exome sequencing for children and the decision to grant parents the right to request them is a medically ethical issue that many still debate today.

Education requirements

[edit]

Aspiring medical students will need 4 years of undergraduate courses at a college or university, which will get them a BS, BA or other bachelor's degree. After completing college, future pediatricians will need to attend 4 years of medical school (MD/DO/MBBS) and later do 3 more years of residency training, the first year of which is called "internship." After completing the 3 years of residency, physicians are eligible to become certified in pediatrics by passing a rigorous test that deals with medical conditions related to young children.[citation needed]

In high school, future pediatricians are required to take basic science classes such as biology, chemistry, physics, algebra, geometry, and calculus. It is also advisable to learn a foreign language (preferably Spanish in the United States) and be involved in high school organizations and extracurricular activities. After high school, college students simply need to fulfill the basic science course requirements that most medical schools recommend and will need to prepare to take the MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) in their junior or early senior year in college. Once attending medical school, student courses will focus on basic medical sciences like human anatomy, physiology, chemistry, etc., for the first three years, the second year of which is when medical students start to get hands-on experience with actual patients.[40]

Training of pediatricians

[edit]
Pediatrics
Occupation
Names
  • Pediatrician
  • Paediatrician
Occupation type
Specialty
Activity sectors
Medicine
Description
Education required
  • Doctor of Medicine
  • Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine
  • Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS/MBChB)
Fields of
employment
Hospitals, Clinics

The training of pediatricians varies considerably across the world. Depending on jurisdiction and university, a medical degree course may be either undergraduate-entry or graduate-entry. The former commonly takes five or six years and has been usual in the Commonwealth. Entrants to graduate-entry courses (as in the US), usually lasting four or five years, have previously completed a three- or four-year university degree, commonly but by no means always in sciences. Medical graduates hold a degree specific to the country and university in and from which they graduated. This degree qualifies that medical practitioner to become licensed or registered under the laws of that particular country, and sometimes of several countries, subject to requirements for "internship" or "conditional registration".

Pediatricians must undertake further training in their chosen field. This may take from four to eleven or more years depending on jurisdiction and the degree of specialization.

In the United States, a medical school graduate wishing to specialize in pediatrics must undergo a three-year residency composed of outpatient, inpatient, and critical care rotations. Subspecialties within pediatrics require further training in the form of 3-year fellowships. Subspecialties include critical care, gastroenterology, neurology, infectious disease, hematology/oncology, rheumatology, pulmonology, child abuse, emergency medicine, endocrinology, neonatology, and others.[41]

In most jurisdictions, entry-level degrees are common to all branches of the medical profession, but in some jurisdictions, specialization in pediatrics may begin before completion of this degree. In some jurisdictions, pediatric training is begun immediately following the completion of entry-level training. In other jurisdictions, junior medical doctors must undertake generalist (unstreamed) training for a number of years before commencing pediatric (or any other) specialization. Specialist training is often largely under the control of 'pediatric organizations (see below) rather than universities and depends on the jurisdiction.

Subspecialties

[edit]

Subspecialties of pediatrics include:

(not an exhaustive list)

  • Addiction medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Adolescent medicine
  • Child abuse pediatrics
  • Clinical genetics
  • Clinical informatics
  • Developmental-behavioral pediatrics
  • Headache medicine
  • Hospital medicine
  • Medical toxicology
  • Metabolic medicine
  • Neonatology/Perinatology
  • Pain medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Palliative care (multidisciplinary)
  • Pediatric allergy and immunology
  • Pediatric cardiology
    • Pediatric cardiac critical care
  • Pediatric critical care
    • Neurocritical care
    • Pediatric cardiac critical care
  • Pediatric emergency medicine
  • Pediatric endocrinology
  • Pediatric gastroenterology
    • Transplant hepatology
  • Pediatric hematology
  • Pediatric infectious disease
  • Pediatric nephrology
  • Pediatric oncology
    • Pediatric neuro-oncology
  • Pediatric pulmonology
  • Primary care
  • Pediatric rheumatology
  • Sleep medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Social pediatrics
  • Sports medicine

Other specialties that care for children

[edit]

(not an exhaustive list)

  • Child neurology
    • Addiction medicine (multidisciplinary)
    • Brain injury medicine
    • Clinical neurophysiology
    • Epilepsy
    • Headache medicine
    • Neurocritical care
    • Neuroimmunology
    • Neuromuscular medicine
    • Pain medicine (multidisciplinary)
    • Palliative care (multidisciplinary)
    • Pediatric neuro-oncology
    • Sleep medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Child and adolescent psychiatry, subspecialty of psychiatry
  • Neurodevelopmental disabilities
  • Pediatric anesthesiology, subspecialty of anesthesiology
  • Pediatric dentistry, subspecialty of dentistry
  • Pediatric dermatology, subspecialty of dermatology
  • Pediatric gynecology
  • Pediatric neurosurgery, subspecialty of neurosurgery
  • Pediatric ophthalmology, subspecialty of ophthalmology
  • Pediatric orthopedic surgery, subspecialty of orthopedic surgery
  • Pediatric otolaryngology, subspecialty of otolaryngology
  • Pediatric plastic surgery, subspecialty of plastic surgery
  • Pediatric radiology, subspecialty of radiology
  • Pediatric rehabilitation medicine, subspecialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • Pediatric surgery, subspecialty of general surgery
  • Pediatric urology, subspecialty of urology

See also

[edit]
  • American Academy of Pediatrics
  • American Osteopathic Board of Pediatrics
  • Center on Media and Child Health (CMCH)
  • Children's hospital
  • List of pediatric organizations
  • List of pediatrics journals
  • Medical specialty
  • Pediatric Oncall
  • Pain in babies
  • Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Pediatric environmental health

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Paediatrics" (PDF). nhs.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 July 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  2. ^ "Choosing a Pediatrician for Your New Baby (for Parents) - Nemours KidsHealth". kidshealth.org. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 13 July 2020.
  3. ^ "Age limits of pediatrics". Pediatrics. 81 (5): 736. May 1988. doi:10.1542/peds.81.5.736. PMID 3357740. S2CID 245164191. Archived from the original on 19 April 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  4. ^ Sawyer, Susan M.; McNeil, Robyn; Francis, Kate L.; Matskarofski, Juliet Z.; Patton, George C.; Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.; Esangbedo, Dorothy O.; Klein, Jonathan D. (1 November 2019). "The age of paediatrics". The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 3 (11): 822–830. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30266-4. ISSN 2352-4642. PMID 31542355. S2CID 202732818.
  5. ^ a b c d e Duffin, Jacalyn (2010). History of Medicine, Second Edition: A Scandalously Short Introduction. University of Toronto Press.
  6. ^ a b c d e Colón, A. R.; Colón, P. A. (January 1999). Nurturing children: a history of pediatrics. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-31080-5. Retrieved 20 October 2012.
  7. ^ Celsus, De Medicina, Book 3, Chapter 7, § 1.
  8. ^ John G. Raffensperger. Children's Surgery: A Worldwide History. McFarland. p. 21.
  9. ^ David Levinson; Karen Christensen. Encyclopedia of modern Asia. Vol. 4. Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 116.
  10. ^ Desai, A.B. Textbook Of Paediatrics. Orient blackswan. p. 1.
  11. ^ Dunn, P. M. (1995). "Soranus of Ephesus (Circa AD 98-138) and perinatal care in Roman times". Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 73 (1): F51 – F52. doi:10.1136/fn.73.1.f51. PMC 2528358. PMID 7552600.
  12. ^ Elgood, Cyril (2010). A Medical History of Persia and The Eastern Caliphate (1st ed.). London: Cambridge. pp. 202–203. ISBN 978-1-108-01588-2. By writing a monograph on 'Diseases in Children' he may also be looked upon as the father of paediatrics.
  13. ^ U.S. National Library of Medicine, "Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts, Al-Razi, the Clinician" [1] Archived 5 January 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ "Achar S Textbook Of Pediatrics (Third Edition)". A. B. Desai (ed.) (1989). p.1. ISBN 81-250-0440-8
  15. ^ Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  16. ^ Lock, Stephen; John M. Last; George Dunea (2001). The Oxford illustrated companion to medicine. Oxford University Press US. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-19-262950-0. Retrieved 9 July 2010. Rosen von Rosenstein.
  17. ^ Roberts, Michael (2003). The Age of Liberty: Sweden 1719–1772. Cambridge University Press. p. 216. ISBN 978-0-521-52707-1. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  18. ^ Dallas, John. "Classics of Child Care". Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  19. ^ Duffin, Jacalyn (29 May 2010). History of Medicine, Second Edition: A Scandalously Short Introduction. University of Toronto Press.
  20. ^ Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  21. ^ "Broadribb's Introductory Pediatric Nursing". Nancy T. Hatfield (2007). p.4. ISBN 0-7817-7706-2
  22. ^ "Jacobi Medical Center - General Information". Archived from the original on 18 April 2006. Retrieved 6 April 2006.
  23. ^ Kutzsche, Stefan (8 April 2021). "Abraham Jacobi (1830–1919) and his transition from political to medical activist". Acta Paediatrica. 110 (8): 2303–2305. doi:10.1111/apa.15887. ISSN 0803-5253. PMID 33963612. S2CID 233998658. Archived from the original on 7 May 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2023.
  24. ^ a b Ballbriga, Angel (1991). "One century of pediatrics in Europe (section: development of pediatric hospitals in Europe)". In Nichols, Burford L.; et al. (eds.). History of Paediatrics 1850–1950. Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series. Vol. 22. New York: Raven Press. pp. 6–8. ISBN 0-88167-695-0.
  25. ^ official history site (in French) of nineteenth century paediatric hospitals in Paris
  26. ^ "Introducing the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital". Hôpital des Necker-Enfants Malades.
  27. ^ Young, D.G. (August 1999). "The Mason Brown Lecture: Scots and paediatric surgery". Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh. 44 (4): 211–5. PMID 10453141. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014.
  28. ^ Pearson, Howard A. (1991). "Pediatrics in the United States". In Nichols, Burford L.; et al. (eds.). History of Paediatrics 1850–1950. Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series. Vol. 22. New York: Raven Press. pp. 55–63. ISBN 0-88167-695-0.
  29. ^ "Commentaries: Edwards A Park". Pediatrics. 44 (6). American Academy of Pediatrics: 897–901. 1969. doi:10.1542/peds.44.6.897. PMID 4903838. S2CID 43298798.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h O'Hara, Kate (2016). "Paediatric pharmacokinetics and drug doses". Australian Prescriber. 39 (6): 208–210. doi:10.18773/austprescr.2016.071. ISSN 0312-8008. PMC 5155058. PMID 27990048.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Wagner, Jonathan; Abdel-Rahman, Susan M. (2013). "Pediatric pharmacokinetics". Pediatrics in Review. 34 (6): 258–269. doi:10.1542/pir.34-6-258. ISSN 1526-3347. PMID 23729775.
  32. ^ a b c d e f Batchelor, Hannah Katharine; Marriott, John Francis (2015). "Paediatric pharmacokinetics: key considerations". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 79 (3): 395–404. doi:10.1111/bcp.12267. ISSN 1365-2125. PMC 4345950. PMID 25855821.
  33. ^ Katz, Aviva L.; Webb, Sally A.; COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS; Macauley, Robert C.; Mercurio, Mark R.; Moon, Margaret R.; Okun, Alexander L.; Opel, Douglas J.; Statter, Mindy B. (1 August 2016). "Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice". Pediatrics. 138 (2): e20161485. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1485. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 27456510. S2CID 7951515.
  34. ^ a b Mazur, Kate A.; Berg, Stacey L., eds. (2020). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. pp. 13–21. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22684-8. ISBN 978-3-030-22683-1. S2CID 208302429.
  35. ^ a b Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  36. ^ Friedman, Lainie Ross (2004). Children, families, and health care decision making. Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-925154-1. OCLC 756393117.
  37. ^ a b c Martakis, K.; Schröder-Bäck, P.; Brand, H. (1 June 2018). "Developing child autonomy in pediatric healthcare: towards an ethical model". Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria. 116 (3): e401 – e408. doi:10.5546/aap.2018.eng.e401. ISSN 0325-0075. PMID 29756714. S2CID 46889502.
  38. ^ Schapiro, Tamar (1 July 1999). "What Is a Child?". Ethics. 109 (4): 715–738. doi:10.1086/233943. ISSN 0014-1704. S2CID 170129444. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  39. ^ Dondorp, W.; Bolt, I.; Tibben, A.; De Wert, G.; Van Summeren, M. (1 September 2021). "'We Should View Him as an Individual': The Role of the Child's Future Autonomy in Shared Decision-Making About Unsolicited Findings in Pediatric Exome Sequencing". Health Care Analysis. 29 (3): 249–261. doi:10.1007/s10728-020-00425-7. ISSN 1573-3394. PMID 33389383. S2CID 230112761.
  40. ^ "What Education Is Required to Be a Pediatrician?". Archived from the original on 7 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  41. ^ "CoPS". www.pedsubs.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2013. Retrieved 14 August 2015.

Further reading

[edit]
  • BMC Pediatrics - open access
  • Clinical Pediatrics
  • Developmental Review - partial open access
  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • The Journal of Pediatrics - partial open access
[edit]
  • Pediatrics Directory at Curlie
  • Pediatric Health Directory at OpenMD