The Role of CBCT in Complex Orthodontic Cases

The Role of CBCT in Complex Orthodontic Cases

Understanding brackets: Types and functions in orthodontic treatment

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a powerful tool in the field of orthodontics, particularly when dealing with complex cases in children. Orthodontists are increasingly relying on CBCT to gain a more comprehensive understanding of dental and skeletal structures, which traditional two-dimensional radiographs may not fully capture. This essay explores the role of CBCT in managing complex orthodontic cases in pediatric patients.


Proper oral hygiene is crucial during orthodontic treatment Child-friendly orthodontic solutions disease.

Complex orthodontic cases in children often involve intricate dental and skeletal issues that require detailed visualization for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. These cases may include impacted teeth, severe crowding, significant skeletal discrepancies, root resorption, or craniofacial anomalies. Traditional radiographic techniques, such as panoramic and cephalometric radiographs, provide limited information due to their two-dimensional nature. This is where CBCT steps in, offering three-dimensional imaging that allows for a more precise assessment of these complexities.


One of the primary advantages of CBCT is its ability to provide high-resolution images with minimal distortion. This clarity enables orthodontists to accurately locate impacted teeth, assess their position relative to adjacent structures, and plan surgical interventions if necessary. For instance, canines are among the most commonly impacted teeth, and their precise localization is crucial for successful exposure and alignment. CBCT imaging can reveal the exact position of the impacted canine within the jawbone, its proximity to other teeth or vital structures like nerves and blood vessels, and any potential obstructions that could complicate treatment.


Severe crowding is another common issue that benefits from CBCT imagery analysis . In such cases , CBCT provides detailed information regarding root orientation , proximity ,and resorption which allows orthodontist plan extraction spaces accurately if necessary .This also helps prevent complications arising due incorrect placement orthodontics appliances which might damage roots accidentally during treatment process .By assess root resorption early stages prevent further deterioration thus preservation overall tooth health .


CBCT also plays an essential role when dealing significant skeletal discrepancies often observed growth related issues such class III malocclusion(underbite) resulting mandibular prognathism maxillary retrusion .The three dimensional reconstruction skeletal base relationship facial structures enable orthodontist evaluate underlying causes these discrepancies accordingly tailor treatments plans alignment facial profile harmony functional occlusion .This includes surgical orthodontics combination jaw surgery ensuring predictable stable results post treatment phase thus enhancing patient overall quality life improving self esteem confidence levels significantly impacted appearance related concerns otherwise addressed traditionally therapies effectively .


In cases involving craniofacial anomalies such cleft palate syndromic conditions proper understanding extent defect affected areas crucial planning comprehensive multidisciplinary approach involve specialist field plastic surgery oral maxillofacial surgeons pediatric dentists amongst others ensure optimal outcomes holistic patient centered management protocol followed throughout course therapy till completion desired goals achieved successfully both functionally aesthetically speaking alike aspects considered equally important ensuring balanced harmonious outcome attained eventually resultant satisfactory conclusion reached mutual collaboration efforts put forth dedicated team professionals involved treating complex case scenarios efficiently competently manner expected

In the realm of orthodontics, precision is key when it comes to diagnosing and planning treatments, especially for complex cases in children. This is where Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) steps into the spotlight. Unlike traditional two-dimensional radiographs, CBCT offers a three-dimensional perspective, providing orthodontists with an unprecedented level of detail and accuracy.


CBCT captures images by rotating around the patient's head, taking multiple snapshots from various angles. These images are then compiled to create a comprehensive 3D model of the craniofacial structure, including both hard and soft tissues. This holistic view allows orthodontists to assess not just the teeth, but also the surrounding bone, nerves, and other vital structures-something that traditional X-rays simply cannot match.


For complex orthodontic cases in children, CBCT's ability to reveal hidden intricacies is particularly beneficial. It aids in identifying issues such as impacted teeth, supernumerary teeth (extra teeth), or even pathological lesions that might otherwise go undetected with conventional methods. By pinpointing these problems early on, orthodontists can intervene more effectively, preventing potential complications down the line.


Moreover, CBCT plays a pivotal role in treatment planning. The detailed 3D visualization enables orthodontists to simulate various treatment options virtually, allowing them to choose the most effective approach. This is especially crucial in complex cases where multiple interventions might be necessary, such as extractions, surgical procedures, or corrective appliances. With CBCT's insights, orthodontists can tailor treatments to each child's unique needs, ensuring better outcomes and minimizing risks.


Another significant advantage is CBCT's ability to evaluate airway dimensions and skeletal patterns. For children with breathing issues or craniofacial anomalies, this information is vital. It helps orthodontists understand how dental and skeletal structures relate to overall health and function, thereby integrating comprehensive care plans that address both aesthetic and functional concerns.


In conclusion, CBCT has revolutionized the field of orthodontics by providing a deeper understanding of complex cases in children. Its precise diagnostic capabilities and detailed visualization enhance treatment planning, leading to more accurate interventions and better long-term results. As technology continues to advance, CBCT remains an indispensable tool for orthodontists striving to deliver exceptional care to their young patients

How brackets contribute to the alignment and movement of teeth

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a powerful tool in orthodontic practice, offering several advantages over traditional radiographic methods, especially when it comes to treating complex orthodontic cases in children. The role of CBCT in such scenarios is indispensable due to its ability to provide detailed and accurate three-dimensional images of dental structures and surrounding tissues.


One of the primary advantages of CBCT is its enhanced diagnostic capability. Traditional two-dimensional radiographs often fall short in capturing the intricate details necessary for complex orthodontic planning. In contrast, CBCT scans offer a comprehensive view that includes all planes-sagittal, coronal, and axial-allowing orthodontists to better visualize tooth positioning, root angulation, and facial skeletal relationships. This detailed information is crucial for diagnosing issues such as impacted teeth, ectopic eruption paths, and skeletal discrepancies that might affect treatment outcomes.


Another significant benefit is the precision it offers in treatment planning. With CBCT images, orthodontists can accurately measure distances and angles within the jaw and teeth structures. This precision enables more effective planning of procedures like tooth extraction or surgical interventions that may be required for complex cases involving severe crowding or misalignment issues common among kids undergoing orthodontic treatment. Furthermore, CBCT scans can aid in creating customized appliances that are perfectly tailored to each patient's anatomy, ensuring more predictable results and shorter treatment times.


CBCT also plays a vital role in monitoring treatment progression and identifying potential complications early on. The ability to compare pre-treatment scans with mid-treatment images allows orthodontists to assess how well the teeth are responding to braces or aligners and make necessary adjustments promptly. This ongoing evaluation helps prevent complications such as root resorption or bone loss around teeth undergoing movement-issues that could otherwise go undetected until they become problematic if relying solely on 2D radiographs which lack depth perception capabilities inherent in CBCT scans .


Lastly, CBCT's non-invasive nature makes it particularly suitable for pediatric patients who may find conventional imaging techniques uncomfortable or invasive . The quick scanning process reduces anxiety levels commonly associated with younger patients , making their experience more pleasant . Moreover , modern CBCT machines are designed with lower radiation doses , minimizing exposure risks while still providing high - quality images essential for precise diagnosis and treatment planning . In summary , incorporating CBCT into pediatric orthodontic practice enhances diagnostic accuracy , facilitates precise treatment planning , allows for close monitoring , ensures better outcomes ,and offers a patient - friendly experience overall . These advantages collectively underscore why CBCT is increasingly preferred over traditional radiographic methods when dealing with complex orthodontic cases involving children .

Benefits of early orthodontic intervention with brackets for kids

In the realm of orthodontics, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool, particularly in complex cases. However, when it comes to pediatric patients, the use of CBCT requires careful consideration, primarily due to safety concerns and radiation exposure.


CBCT offers a comprehensive three-dimensional view of craniofacial structures, providing valuable insights for orthodontists managing intricate cases such as impacted teeth, skeletal discrepancies, and airway assessments. This level of detail is often unattainable with traditional two-dimensional radiographs. Yet, the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks associated with radiation exposure, especially in children whose developing tissues are more sensitive to ionizing radiation.


Radiation exposure is a critical concern because children have a longer lifespan ahead of them during which radiation-induced damage could manifest. The "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principle is paramount here-clinicians must ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks and that every effort is made to minimize exposure. This includes using child-sized doses, employing shielding techniques, and opting for lower-dose protocols when possible.


Safety considerations extend beyond just radiation. Ensuring that young patients remain still during the scan is crucial for obtaining accurate images and reducing the need for retakes. Proper communication with parents and guardians about the procedure's necessity and potential risks is essential for informed consent and building trust. Additionally, clinicians should stay updated on advancements in imaging technology that might offer reduced radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic quality.


In conclusion, while CBCT is an invaluable tool in complex orthodontic cases involving pediatric patients, its use must be approached with caution. Balancing the diagnostic advantages against radiation exposure risks, adhering to safety guidelines, and maintaining open communication with families are key components in ensuring responsible and effective utilization of this technology in pediatric orthodontics

The role of parental support during orthodontic treatment with brackets

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has revolutionized the field of orthodontics, particularly in managing complex cases. Its ability to provide high-resolution, three-dimensional images of craniofacial structures has given orthodontists unprecedented insights into the intricacies of each patient's anatomy. When it comes to pediatric orthodontic care, integrating CBCT with other advanced technologies like 3D printing and digital software can significantly enhance treatment outcomes.


In complex orthodontic cases, CBCT scans offer detailed visualization of impacted teeth, skeletal discrepancies, and airway issues, which are often challenging to diagnose with traditional 2D radiographs. This comprehensive data allows for more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. For instance, identifying the exact position and angulation of impacted canines can guide clinicians in planning surgical exposure and subsequent orthodontic movement more effectively.


The integration of CBCT with digital software takes this a step further by enabling virtual treatment simulations. Software platforms can import CBCT data to create precise digital models of a patient's dentition and surrounding structures. These models can be manipulated to simulate various treatment options, allowing orthodontists to predict outcomes and choose the most effective plan before any actual procedures begin. This level of precision is crucial in pediatric cases where early intervention can prevent more severe issues later in life.


3D printing further complements this technological synergy by providing tangible models derived from CBCT data. These printed models can be used for surgical guides, custom appliances, or even educational purposes to explain complex treatments to patients and their families. The tactile nature of these models helps visualize intricate procedures and ensures that surgical interventions are executed with high accuracy, especially in cases involving bone grafting or distraction osteogenesis.


Moreover, integrating these technologies fosters a multidisciplinary approach essential for managing complex orthodontic cases in pediatric patients. Collaboration among orthodontists, oral surgeons, pediatric dentists, and ENT specialists becomes more streamlined when everyone has access to detailed CBCT images and digital models. This interdisciplinary cooperation ensures that all aspects of a patient's care are considered holistically, leading to better coordinated treatment plans and superior outcomes.


In conclusion, integrating CBCT with 3D printing and digital software represents a paradigm shift in pediatric orthodontic care for complex cases. This technological fusion provides unparalleled diagnostic accuracy, facilitates precise treatment planning through virtual simulations, enables high-precision surgical interventions with 3D printed models, and fosters seamless multidisciplinary collaboration. As these technologies continue to evolve, their role in enhancing pediatric orthodontic care will only become more pronounced, ensuring that even the most challenging cases are managed with greater efficiency and success.

Long-term effects and maintenance after bracket removal

In the ever-evolving landscape of orthodontics, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a pivotal tool, particularly in managing complex cases involving children. As we gaze into the future, several trends and innovations promise to enhance CBCT's role in this realm, bringing even more precision and possibilities to orthodontic treatment.


One of the most anticipated trends is the advancement of low-dose CBCT protocols. Children, with their growing tissues, are especially sensitive to radiation. Thus, reducing their exposure during scans is paramount. Future CBCT machines will likely incorporate advanced algorithms and iterative reconstruction techniques to produce high-quality images with significantly lower radiation doses, making them safer for young patients.


Another exciting innovation is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into CBCT imaging. AI can automate and expedite tasks such as landmark detection, cephalometric analysis, and airway assessment, reducing human error and saving clinicians valuable time. Furthermore, AI can help predict growth patterns and treatment outcomes, enabling orthodontists to devise more personalized and effective treatment plans for their young patients.


The fusion of CBCT with other digital technologies, like intraoral scanners and 3D printing, is also expected to become more seamless and widespread. This fusion will allow for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and improved case presentation, facilitating better communication with patients and parents regarding treatment needs and expected outcomes.


Moreover, dynamic or 4D CBCT is on the horizon as a potential game-changer. Unlike conventional CBCT that captures static images, 4D CBCT provides insights into the movement and function of craniofacial structures. This could revolutionize our understanding and treatment of complex orthodontic cases involving airway issues or functional disorders in children.


Lastly, expect an increase in CBCT use for interdisciplinary planning among orthodontists, oral surgeons, pediatric dentists, and other specialists. Complex cases often require a team approach, and shared access to detailed 3D images can foster better collaboration and coordinated care.


In conclusion, these future trends and innovations in CBCT technology hold tremendous potential to elevate the standard of care in complex orthodontic cases for kids. They promise improved safety, enhanced diagnosis, personalized treatment planning, and better communication among care providers-all vital components for successful orthodontic outcomes in young patients.

 

Pediatrics
A pediatrician examines a neonate.
Focus Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults
Subdivisions Paediatric cardiology, neonatology, critical care, pediatric oncology, hospital medicine, primary care, others (see below)
Significant diseases Congenital diseases, Infectious diseases, Childhood cancer, Mental disorders
Significant tests World Health Organization Child Growth Standards
Specialist Pediatrician
Glossary Glossary of medicine

Pediatrics (American English) also spelled paediatrics (British English), is the branch of medicine that involves the medical care of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. In the United Kingdom, pediatrics covers many of their youth until the age of 18.[1] The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends people seek pediatric care through the age of 21, but some pediatric subspecialists continue to care for adults up to 25.[2][3] Worldwide age limits of pediatrics have been trending upward year after year.[4] A medical doctor who specializes in this area is known as a pediatrician, or paediatrician. The word pediatrics and its cognates mean "healer of children", derived from the two Greek words: παá¿–ς (pais "child") and á¼°ατρÏŒς (iatros "doctor, healer"). Pediatricians work in clinics, research centers, universities, general hospitals and children's hospitals, including those who practice pediatric subspecialties (e.g. neonatology requires resources available in a NICU).

History

[edit]
Part of Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, United Kingdom, which was the first pediatric hospital in the English-speaking world.

The earliest mentions of child-specific medical problems appear in the Hippocratic Corpus, published in the fifth century B.C., and the famous Sacred Disease. These publications discussed topics such as childhood epilepsy and premature births. From the first to fourth centuries A.D., Greek philosophers and physicians Celsus, Soranus of Ephesus, Aretaeus, Galen, and Oribasius, also discussed specific illnesses affecting children in their works, such as rashes, epilepsy, and meningitis.[5] Already Hippocrates, Aristotle, Celsus, Soranus, and Galen[6] understood the differences in growing and maturing organisms that necessitated different treatment: Ex toto non sic pueri ut viri curari debent ("In general, boys should not be treated in the same way as men").[7] Some of the oldest traces of pediatrics can be discovered in Ancient India where children's doctors were called kumara bhrtya.[6]

Even though some pediatric works existed during this time, they were scarce and rarely published due to a lack of knowledge in pediatric medicine. Sushruta Samhita, an ayurvedic text composed during the sixth century BCE, contains the text about pediatrics.[8] Another ayurvedic text from this period is Kashyapa Samhita.[9][10] A second century AD manuscript by the Greek physician and gynecologist Soranus of Ephesus dealt with neonatal pediatrics.[11] Byzantine physicians Oribasius, Aëtius of Amida, Alexander Trallianus, and Paulus Aegineta contributed to the field.[6] The Byzantines also built brephotrophia (crêches).[6] Islamic Golden Age writers served as a bridge for Greco-Roman and Byzantine medicine and added ideas of their own, especially Haly Abbas, Yahya Serapion, Abulcasis, Avicenna, and Averroes. The Persian philosopher and physician al-Razi (865–925), sometimes called the father of pediatrics, published a monograph on pediatrics titled Diseases in Children.[12][13] Also among the first books about pediatrics was Libellus [Opusculum] de aegritudinibus et remediis infantium 1472 ("Little Book on Children Diseases and Treatment"), by the Italian pediatrician Paolo Bagellardo.[14][5] In sequence came Bartholomäus Metlinger's Ein Regiment der Jungerkinder 1473, Cornelius Roelans (1450–1525) no title Buchlein, or Latin compendium, 1483, and Heinrich von Louffenburg (1391–1460) Versehung des Leibs written in 1429 (published 1491), together form the Pediatric Incunabula, four great medical treatises on children's physiology and pathology.[6]

While more information about childhood diseases became available, there was little evidence that children received the same kind of medical care that adults did.[15] It was during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries that medical experts started offering specialized care for children.[5] The Swedish physician Nils Rosén von Rosenstein (1706–1773) is considered to be the founder of modern pediatrics as a medical specialty,[16][17] while his work The diseases of children, and their remedies (1764) is considered to be "the first modern textbook on the subject".[18] However, it was not until the nineteenth century that medical professionals acknowledged pediatrics as a separate field of medicine. The first pediatric-specific publications appeared between the 1790s and the 1920s.[19]

Etymology

[edit]

The term pediatrics was first introduced in English in 1859 by Abraham Jacobi. In 1860, he became "the first dedicated professor of pediatrics in the world."[20] Jacobi is known as the father of American pediatrics because of his many contributions to the field.[21][22] He received his medical training in Germany and later practiced in New York City.[23]

The first generally accepted pediatric hospital is the Hôpital des Enfants Malades (French: Hospital for Sick Children), which opened in Paris in June 1802 on the site of a previous orphanage.[24] From its beginning, this famous hospital accepted patients up to the age of fifteen years,[25] and it continues to this day as the pediatric division of the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, created in 1920 by merging with the nearby Necker Hospital, founded in 1778.[26]

In other European countries, the Charité (a hospital founded in 1710) in Berlin established a separate Pediatric Pavilion in 1830, followed by similar institutions at Saint Petersburg in 1834, and at Vienna and Breslau (now WrocÅ‚aw), both in 1837. In 1852 Britain's first pediatric hospital, the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street was founded by Charles West.[24] The first Children's hospital in Scotland opened in 1860 in Edinburgh.[27] In the US, the first similar institutions were the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, which opened in 1855, and then Boston Children's Hospital (1869).[28] Subspecialties in pediatrics were created at the Harriet Lane Home at Johns Hopkins by Edwards A. Park.[29]

Differences between adult and pediatric medicine

[edit]

The body size differences are paralleled by maturation changes. The smaller body of an infant or neonate is substantially different physiologically from that of an adult. Congenital defects, genetic variance, and developmental issues are of greater concern to pediatricians than they often are to adult physicians. A common adage is that children are not simply "little adults". The clinician must take into account the immature physiology of the infant or child when considering symptoms, prescribing medications, and diagnosing illnesses.[30]

Pediatric physiology directly impacts the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs that enter the body. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of medications differ between developing children and grown adults.[30][31][32] Despite completed studies and reviews, continual research is needed to better understand how these factors should affect the decisions of healthcare providers when prescribing and administering medications to the pediatric population.[30]

Absorption

[edit]

Many drug absorption differences between pediatric and adult populations revolve around the stomach. Neonates and young infants have increased stomach pH due to decreased acid secretion, thereby creating a more basic environment for drugs that are taken by mouth.[31][30][32] Acid is essential to degrading certain oral drugs before systemic absorption. Therefore, the absorption of these drugs in children is greater than in adults due to decreased breakdown and increased preservation in a less acidic gastric space.[31]

Children also have an extended rate of gastric emptying, which slows the rate of drug absorption.[31][32]

Drug absorption also depends on specific enzymes that come in contact with the oral drug as it travels through the body. Supply of these enzymes increase as children continue to develop their gastrointestinal tract.[31][32] Pediatric patients have underdeveloped proteins, which leads to decreased metabolism and increased serum concentrations of specific drugs. However, prodrugs experience the opposite effect because enzymes are necessary for allowing their active form to enter systemic circulation.[31]

Distribution

[edit]

Percentage of total body water and extracellular fluid volume both decrease as children grow and develop with time. Pediatric patients thus have a larger volume of distribution than adults, which directly affects the dosing of hydrophilic drugs such as beta-lactam antibiotics like ampicillin.[31] Thus, these drugs are administered at greater weight-based doses or with adjusted dosing intervals in children to account for this key difference in body composition.[31][30]

Infants and neonates also have fewer plasma proteins. Thus, highly protein-bound drugs have fewer opportunities for protein binding, leading to increased distribution.[30]

Metabolism

[edit]

Drug metabolism primarily occurs via enzymes in the liver and can vary according to which specific enzymes are affected in a specific stage of development.[31] Phase I and Phase II enzymes have different rates of maturation and development, depending on their specific mechanism of action (i.e. oxidation, hydrolysis, acetylation, methylation, etc.). Enzyme capacity, clearance, and half-life are all factors that contribute to metabolism differences between children and adults.[31][32] Drug metabolism can even differ within the pediatric population, separating neonates and infants from young children.[30]

Elimination

[edit]

Drug elimination is primarily facilitated via the liver and kidneys.[31] In infants and young children, the larger relative size of their kidneys leads to increased renal clearance of medications that are eliminated through urine.[32] In preterm neonates and infants, their kidneys are slower to mature and thus are unable to clear as much drug as fully developed kidneys. This can cause unwanted drug build-up, which is why it is important to consider lower doses and greater dosing intervals for this population.[30][31] Diseases that negatively affect kidney function can also have the same effect and thus warrant similar considerations.[31]

Pediatric autonomy in healthcare

[edit]

A major difference between the practice of pediatric and adult medicine is that children, in most jurisdictions and with certain exceptions, cannot make decisions for themselves. The issues of guardianship, privacy, legal responsibility, and informed consent must always be considered in every pediatric procedure. Pediatricians often have to treat the parents and sometimes, the family, rather than just the child. Adolescents are in their own legal class, having rights to their own health care decisions in certain circumstances. The concept of legal consent combined with the non-legal consent (assent) of the child when considering treatment options, especially in the face of conditions with poor prognosis or complicated and painful procedures/surgeries, means the pediatrician must take into account the desires of many people, in addition to those of the patient.[citation needed]

History of pediatric autonomy

[edit]

The term autonomy is traceable to ethical theory and law, where it states that autonomous individuals can make decisions based on their own logic.[33] Hippocrates was the first to use the term in a medical setting. He created a code of ethics for doctors called the Hippocratic Oath that highlighted the importance of putting patients' interests first, making autonomy for patients a top priority in health care.[34]  

In ancient times, society did not view pediatric medicine as essential or scientific.[35] Experts considered professional medicine unsuitable for treating children. Children also had no rights. Fathers regarded their children as property, so their children's health decisions were entrusted to them.[5] As a result, mothers, midwives, "wise women", and general practitioners treated the children instead of doctors.[35] Since mothers could not rely on professional medicine to take care of their children, they developed their own methods, such as using alkaline soda ash to remove the vernix at birth and treating teething pain with opium or wine. The absence of proper pediatric care, rights, and laws in health care to prioritize children's health led to many of their deaths. Ancient Greeks and Romans sometimes even killed healthy female babies and infants with deformities since they had no adequate medical treatment and no laws prohibiting infanticide.[5]

In the twentieth century, medical experts began to put more emphasis on children's rights. In 1989, in the United Nations Rights of the Child Convention, medical experts developed the Best Interest Standard of Child to prioritize children's rights and best interests. This event marked the onset of pediatric autonomy. In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) finally acknowledged the Best Interest Standard of a Child as an ethical principle for pediatric decision-making, and it is still being used today.[34]

Parental authority and current medical issues

[edit]

The majority of the time, parents have the authority to decide what happens to their child. Philosopher John Locke argued that it is the responsibility of parents to raise their children and that God gave them this authority. In modern society, Jeffrey Blustein, modern philosopher and author of the book Parents and Children: The Ethics of Family, argues that parental authority is granted because the child requires parents to satisfy their needs. He believes that parental autonomy is more about parents providing good care for their children and treating them with respect than parents having rights.[36] The researcher Kyriakos Martakis, MD, MSc, explains that research shows parental influence negatively affects children's ability to form autonomy. However, involving children in the decision-making process allows children to develop their cognitive skills and create their own opinions and, thus, decisions about their health. Parental authority affects the degree of autonomy the child patient has. As a result, in Argentina, the new National Civil and Commercial Code has enacted various changes to the healthcare system to encourage children and adolescents to develop autonomy. It has become more crucial to let children take accountability for their own health decisions.[37]

In most cases, the pediatrician, parent, and child work as a team to make the best possible medical decision. The pediatrician has the right to intervene for the child's welfare and seek advice from an ethics committee. However, in recent studies, authors have denied that complete autonomy is present in pediatric healthcare. The same moral standards should apply to children as they do to adults. In support of this idea is the concept of paternalism, which negates autonomy when it is in the patient's interests. This concept aims to keep the child's best interests in mind regarding autonomy. Pediatricians can interact with patients and help them make decisions that will benefit them, thus enhancing their autonomy. However, radical theories that question a child's moral worth continue to be debated today.[37] Authors often question whether the treatment and equality of a child and an adult should be the same. Author Tamar Schapiro notes that children need nurturing and cannot exercise the same level of authority as adults.[38] Hence, continuing the discussion on whether children are capable of making important health decisions until this day.

Modern advancements

[edit]

According to the Subcommittee of Clinical Ethics of the Argentinean Pediatric Society (SAP), children can understand moral feelings at all ages and can make reasonable decisions based on those feelings. Therefore, children and teens are deemed capable of making their own health decisions when they reach the age of 13. Recently, studies made on the decision-making of children have challenged that age to be 12.[37]

Technology has made several modern advancements that contribute to the future development of child autonomy, for example, unsolicited findings (U.F.s) of pediatric exome sequencing. They are findings based on pediatric exome sequencing that explain in greater detail the intellectual disability of a child and predict to what extent it will affect the child in the future. Genetic and intellectual disorders in children make them incapable of making moral decisions, so people look down upon this kind of testing because the child's future autonomy is at risk. It is still in question whether parents should request these types of testing for their children. Medical experts argue that it could endanger the autonomous rights the child will possess in the future. However, the parents contend that genetic testing would benefit the welfare of their children since it would allow them to make better health care decisions.[39] Exome sequencing for children and the decision to grant parents the right to request them is a medically ethical issue that many still debate today.

Education requirements

[edit]

Aspiring medical students will need 4 years of undergraduate courses at a college or university, which will get them a BS, BA or other bachelor's degree. After completing college, future pediatricians will need to attend 4 years of medical school (MD/DO/MBBS) and later do 3 more years of residency training, the first year of which is called "internship." After completing the 3 years of residency, physicians are eligible to become certified in pediatrics by passing a rigorous test that deals with medical conditions related to young children.[citation needed]

In high school, future pediatricians are required to take basic science classes such as biology, chemistry, physics, algebra, geometry, and calculus. It is also advisable to learn a foreign language (preferably Spanish in the United States) and be involved in high school organizations and extracurricular activities. After high school, college students simply need to fulfill the basic science course requirements that most medical schools recommend and will need to prepare to take the MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) in their junior or early senior year in college. Once attending medical school, student courses will focus on basic medical sciences like human anatomy, physiology, chemistry, etc., for the first three years, the second year of which is when medical students start to get hands-on experience with actual patients.[40]

Training of pediatricians

[edit]
Pediatrics
Occupation
Names
  • Pediatrician
  • Paediatrician
Occupation type
Specialty
Activity sectors
Medicine
Description
Education required
  • Doctor of Medicine
  • Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine
  • Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS/MBChB)
Fields of
employment
Hospitals, Clinics

The training of pediatricians varies considerably across the world. Depending on jurisdiction and university, a medical degree course may be either undergraduate-entry or graduate-entry. The former commonly takes five or six years and has been usual in the Commonwealth. Entrants to graduate-entry courses (as in the US), usually lasting four or five years, have previously completed a three- or four-year university degree, commonly but by no means always in sciences. Medical graduates hold a degree specific to the country and university in and from which they graduated. This degree qualifies that medical practitioner to become licensed or registered under the laws of that particular country, and sometimes of several countries, subject to requirements for "internship" or "conditional registration".

Pediatricians must undertake further training in their chosen field. This may take from four to eleven or more years depending on jurisdiction and the degree of specialization.

In the United States, a medical school graduate wishing to specialize in pediatrics must undergo a three-year residency composed of outpatient, inpatient, and critical care rotations. Subspecialties within pediatrics require further training in the form of 3-year fellowships. Subspecialties include critical care, gastroenterology, neurology, infectious disease, hematology/oncology, rheumatology, pulmonology, child abuse, emergency medicine, endocrinology, neonatology, and others.[41]

In most jurisdictions, entry-level degrees are common to all branches of the medical profession, but in some jurisdictions, specialization in pediatrics may begin before completion of this degree. In some jurisdictions, pediatric training is begun immediately following the completion of entry-level training. In other jurisdictions, junior medical doctors must undertake generalist (unstreamed) training for a number of years before commencing pediatric (or any other) specialization. Specialist training is often largely under the control of 'pediatric organizations (see below) rather than universities and depends on the jurisdiction.

Subspecialties

[edit]

Subspecialties of pediatrics include:

(not an exhaustive list)

  • Addiction medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Adolescent medicine
  • Child abuse pediatrics
  • Clinical genetics
  • Clinical informatics
  • Developmental-behavioral pediatrics
  • Headache medicine
  • Hospital medicine
  • Medical toxicology
  • Metabolic medicine
  • Neonatology/Perinatology
  • Pain medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Palliative care (multidisciplinary)
  • Pediatric allergy and immunology
  • Pediatric cardiology
    • Pediatric cardiac critical care
  • Pediatric critical care
    • Neurocritical care
    • Pediatric cardiac critical care
  • Pediatric emergency medicine
  • Pediatric endocrinology
  • Pediatric gastroenterology
    • Transplant hepatology
  • Pediatric hematology
  • Pediatric infectious disease
  • Pediatric nephrology
  • Pediatric oncology
    • Pediatric neuro-oncology
  • Pediatric pulmonology
  • Primary care
  • Pediatric rheumatology
  • Sleep medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Social pediatrics
  • Sports medicine

Other specialties that care for children

[edit]

(not an exhaustive list)

  • Child neurology
    • Addiction medicine (multidisciplinary)
    • Brain injury medicine
    • Clinical neurophysiology
    • Epilepsy
    • Headache medicine
    • Neurocritical care
    • Neuroimmunology
    • Neuromuscular medicine
    • Pain medicine (multidisciplinary)
    • Palliative care (multidisciplinary)
    • Pediatric neuro-oncology
    • Sleep medicine (multidisciplinary)
  • Child and adolescent psychiatry, subspecialty of psychiatry
  • Neurodevelopmental disabilities
  • Pediatric anesthesiology, subspecialty of anesthesiology
  • Pediatric dentistry, subspecialty of dentistry
  • Pediatric dermatology, subspecialty of dermatology
  • Pediatric gynecology
  • Pediatric neurosurgery, subspecialty of neurosurgery
  • Pediatric ophthalmology, subspecialty of ophthalmology
  • Pediatric orthopedic surgery, subspecialty of orthopedic surgery
  • Pediatric otolaryngology, subspecialty of otolaryngology
  • Pediatric plastic surgery, subspecialty of plastic surgery
  • Pediatric radiology, subspecialty of radiology
  • Pediatric rehabilitation medicine, subspecialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • Pediatric surgery, subspecialty of general surgery
  • Pediatric urology, subspecialty of urology

See also

[edit]
  • American Academy of Pediatrics
  • American Osteopathic Board of Pediatrics
  • Center on Media and Child Health (CMCH)
  • Children's hospital
  • List of pediatric organizations
  • List of pediatrics journals
  • Medical specialty
  • Pediatric Oncall
  • Pain in babies
  • Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
  • Pediatric environmental health

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Paediatrics" (PDF). nhs.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 July 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  2. ^ "Choosing a Pediatrician for Your New Baby (for Parents) - Nemours KidsHealth". kidshealth.org. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 13 July 2020.
  3. ^ "Age limits of pediatrics". Pediatrics. 81 (5): 736. May 1988. doi:10.1542/peds.81.5.736. PMID 3357740. S2CID 245164191. Archived from the original on 19 April 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  4. ^ Sawyer, Susan M.; McNeil, Robyn; Francis, Kate L.; Matskarofski, Juliet Z.; Patton, George C.; Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.; Esangbedo, Dorothy O.; Klein, Jonathan D. (1 November 2019). "The age of paediatrics". The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 3 (11): 822–830. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30266-4. ISSN 2352-4642. PMID 31542355. S2CID 202732818.
  5. ^ a b c d e Duffin, Jacalyn (2010). History of Medicine, Second Edition: A Scandalously Short Introduction. University of Toronto Press.
  6. ^ a b c d e Colón, A. R.; Colón, P. A. (January 1999). Nurturing children: a history of pediatrics. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-31080-5. Retrieved 20 October 2012.
  7. ^ Celsus, De Medicina, Book 3, Chapter 7, § 1.
  8. ^ John G. Raffensperger. Children's Surgery: A Worldwide History. McFarland. p. 21.
  9. ^ David Levinson; Karen Christensen. Encyclopedia of modern Asia. Vol. 4. Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 116.
  10. ^ Desai, A.B. Textbook Of Paediatrics. Orient blackswan. p. 1.
  11. ^ Dunn, P. M. (1995). "Soranus of Ephesus (Circa AD 98-138) and perinatal care in Roman times". Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 73 (1): F51 – F52. doi:10.1136/fn.73.1.f51. PMC 2528358. PMID 7552600.
  12. ^ Elgood, Cyril (2010). A Medical History of Persia and The Eastern Caliphate (1st ed.). London: Cambridge. pp. 202–203. ISBN 978-1-108-01588-2. By writing a monograph on 'Diseases in Children' he may also be looked upon as the father of paediatrics.
  13. ^ U.S. National Library of Medicine, "Islamic Culture and the Medical Arts, Al-Razi, the Clinician" [1] Archived 5 January 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ "Achar S Textbook Of Pediatrics (Third Edition)". A. B. Desai (ed.) (1989). p.1. ISBN 81-250-0440-8
  15. ^ Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  16. ^ Lock, Stephen; John M. Last; George Dunea (2001). The Oxford illustrated companion to medicine. Oxford University Press US. p. 173. ISBN 978-0-19-262950-0. Retrieved 9 July 2010. Rosen von Rosenstein.
  17. ^ Roberts, Michael (2003). The Age of Liberty: Sweden 1719–1772. Cambridge University Press. p. 216. ISBN 978-0-521-52707-1. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  18. ^ Dallas, John. "Classics of Child Care". Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  19. ^ Duffin, Jacalyn (29 May 2010). History of Medicine, Second Edition: A Scandalously Short Introduction. University of Toronto Press.
  20. ^ Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  21. ^ "Broadribb's Introductory Pediatric Nursing". Nancy T. Hatfield (2007). p.4. ISBN 0-7817-7706-2
  22. ^ "Jacobi Medical Center - General Information". Archived from the original on 18 April 2006. Retrieved 6 April 2006.
  23. ^ Kutzsche, Stefan (8 April 2021). "Abraham Jacobi (1830–1919) and his transition from political to medical activist". Acta Paediatrica. 110 (8): 2303–2305. doi:10.1111/apa.15887. ISSN 0803-5253. PMID 33963612. S2CID 233998658. Archived from the original on 7 May 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2023.
  24. ^ a b Ballbriga, Angel (1991). "One century of pediatrics in Europe (section: development of pediatric hospitals in Europe)". In Nichols, Burford L.; et al. (eds.). History of Paediatrics 1850–1950. Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series. Vol. 22. New York: Raven Press. pp. 6–8. ISBN 0-88167-695-0.
  25. ^ official history site (in French) of nineteenth century paediatric hospitals in Paris
  26. ^ "Introducing the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital". Hôpital des Necker-Enfants Malades.
  27. ^ Young, D.G. (August 1999). "The Mason Brown Lecture: Scots and paediatric surgery". Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh. 44 (4): 211–5. PMID 10453141. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014.
  28. ^ Pearson, Howard A. (1991). "Pediatrics in the United States". In Nichols, Burford L.; et al. (eds.). History of Paediatrics 1850–1950. Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series. Vol. 22. New York: Raven Press. pp. 55–63. ISBN 0-88167-695-0.
  29. ^ "Commentaries: Edwards A Park". Pediatrics. 44 (6). American Academy of Pediatrics: 897–901. 1969. doi:10.1542/peds.44.6.897. PMID 4903838. S2CID 43298798.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g h O'Hara, Kate (2016). "Paediatric pharmacokinetics and drug doses". Australian Prescriber. 39 (6): 208–210. doi:10.18773/austprescr.2016.071. ISSN 0312-8008. PMC 5155058. PMID 27990048.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Wagner, Jonathan; Abdel-Rahman, Susan M. (2013). "Pediatric pharmacokinetics". Pediatrics in Review. 34 (6): 258–269. doi:10.1542/pir.34-6-258. ISSN 1526-3347. PMID 23729775.
  32. ^ a b c d e f Batchelor, Hannah Katharine; Marriott, John Francis (2015). "Paediatric pharmacokinetics: key considerations". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 79 (3): 395–404. doi:10.1111/bcp.12267. ISSN 1365-2125. PMC 4345950. PMID 25855821.
  33. ^ Katz, Aviva L.; Webb, Sally A.; COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS; Macauley, Robert C.; Mercurio, Mark R.; Moon, Margaret R.; Okun, Alexander L.; Opel, Douglas J.; Statter, Mindy B. (1 August 2016). "Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice". Pediatrics. 138 (2): e20161485. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1485. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 27456510. S2CID 7951515.
  34. ^ a b Mazur, Kate A.; Berg, Stacey L., eds. (2020). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. pp. 13–21. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22684-8. ISBN 978-3-030-22683-1. S2CID 208302429.
  35. ^ a b Stern, Alexandra Minna; Markel, Howard (2002). Formative Years: Children's Health in the United States, 1880-2000. University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–24. doi:10.3998/mpub.17065. ISBN 978-0-472-02503-9. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  36. ^ Friedman, Lainie Ross (2004). Children, families, and health care decision making. Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-925154-1. OCLC 756393117.
  37. ^ a b c Martakis, K.; Schröder-Bäck, P.; Brand, H. (1 June 2018). "Developing child autonomy in pediatric healthcare: towards an ethical model". Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria. 116 (3): e401 – e408. doi:10.5546/aap.2018.eng.e401. ISSN 0325-0075. PMID 29756714. S2CID 46889502.
  38. ^ Schapiro, Tamar (1 July 1999). "What Is a Child?". Ethics. 109 (4): 715–738. doi:10.1086/233943. ISSN 0014-1704. S2CID 170129444. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  39. ^ Dondorp, W.; Bolt, I.; Tibben, A.; De Wert, G.; Van Summeren, M. (1 September 2021). "'We Should View Him as an Individual': The Role of the Child's Future Autonomy in Shared Decision-Making About Unsolicited Findings in Pediatric Exome Sequencing". Health Care Analysis. 29 (3): 249–261. doi:10.1007/s10728-020-00425-7. ISSN 1573-3394. PMID 33389383. S2CID 230112761.
  40. ^ "What Education Is Required to Be a Pediatrician?". Archived from the original on 7 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  41. ^ "CoPS". www.pedsubs.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2013. Retrieved 14 August 2015.

Further reading

[edit]
  • BMC Pediatrics - open access
  • Clinical Pediatrics
  • Developmental Review - partial open access
  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • The Journal of Pediatrics - partial open access
[edit]
  • Pediatrics Directory at Curlie
  • Pediatric Health Directory at OpenMD

 

Redirect to:

  • Tooth decay
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.