Al Gore and the new American Dream

Posted by bex — 18 July 2008 at 3:04pm - Comments

More good news on the renewables front today: Al Gore has challenged the US to produce 100 per cent of its power from renewable sources in 10 years.

Gore has pitched his plan as the solution to not only climate change but also to high oil prices and energy insecurity - and as a way to keep the US economy healthy and to ensure national security.

A few of my favourite bits (the full text is here):

In my search for genuinely effective answers to the climate crisis, I have held a series of “solutions summits” with engineers, scientists, and CEOs. In those discussions, one thing has become abundantly clear: when you connect the dots, it turns out that the real solutions to the climate crisis are the very same measures needed to renew our economy and escape the trap of ever-rising energy prices. Moreover, they are also the very same solutions we need to guarantee our national security without having to go to war in the Persian Gulf...

Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years.

This goal is achievable, affordable and transformative. It represents a challenge to all Americans – in every walk of life: to our political leaders, entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers, and to every citizen...

A few years ago, it would not have been possible to issue such a challenge. But here’s what’s changed: the sharp cost reductions now beginning to take place in solar, wind, and geothermal power – coupled with the recent dramatic price increases for oil and coal – have radically changed the economics of energy....

To those who say the costs are still too high: I ask them to consider whether the costs of oil and coal will ever stop increasing if we keep relying on quickly depleting energy sources to feed a rapidly growing demand all around the world. When demand for oil and coal increases, their price goes up. When demand for solar cells increases, the price often comes down.

Of course the greatest obstacle to meeting the challenge of 100 percent renewable electricity in 10 years may be the deep dysfunction of our politics and our self-governing system as it exists today. In recent years, our politics has tended toward incremental proposals made up of small policies designed to avoid offending special interests, alternating with occasional baby steps in the right direction. Our democracy has become sclerotic at a time when these crises require boldness.

It is only a truly dysfunctional system that would buy into the perverse logic that the short-term answer to high gasoline prices is drilling for more oil ten years from now.

Am I the only one who finds it strange that our government so often adopts a so-called solution that has absolutely nothing to do with the problem it is supposed to address? When people rightly complain about higher gasoline prices, we propose to give more money to the oil companies and pretend that they’re going to bring gasoline prices down. It will do nothing of the sort, and everyone knows it. If we keep going back to the same policies that have never ever worked in the past and have served only to produce the highest gasoline prices in history alongside the greatest oil company profits in history, nobody should be surprised if we get the same result over and over again. But the Congress may be poised to move in that direction anyway because some of them are being stampeded by lobbyists for special interests that know how to make the system work for them instead of the American people.

If you want to know the truth about gasoline prices, here it is: the exploding demand for oil, especially in places like China, is overwhelming the rate of new discoveries by so much that oil prices are almost certain to continue upward over time no matter what the oil companies promise. And politicians cannot bring gasoline prices down in the short term.

So I ask you to join with me to call on every candidate, at every level, to accept this challenge – for America to be running on 100 percent zero-carbon electricity in 10 years. It's time for us to move beyond empty rhetoric. We need to act now.

 

Via The Sietch, EcoGeek, EnviroWonk, Grist etc.

Thanks for drawing the article to our attention. The first sentence of this article misrepresents the content of Gore's speech, though: he calls for 100 percent zero-carbon electricity in 10 years in the US, not 'power'.

He refers to oil and gasoline but his challenge to all presidential candidates relates to electricity generation only. He implies a massive increase in electric vehicles, and has nothing to say on the subject of renewable heat. In 1997 domestic energy use from electricity was at 35% of all energy used (EIA).

This is all excellent and laudable, but let's be clear about what he's calling for.

He's talking about electricity. Sorry for the fuzzy terminology.

Cheers jakobovich,

Bex
gpuk

Thanks for drawing the article to our attention. The first sentence of this article misrepresents the content of Gore's speech, though: he calls for 100 percent zero-carbon electricity in 10 years in the US, not 'power'. He refers to oil and gasoline but his challenge to all presidential candidates relates to electricity generation only. He implies a massive increase in electric vehicles, and has nothing to say on the subject of renewable heat. In 1997 domestic energy use from electricity was at 35% of all energy used (EIA). This is all excellent and laudable, but let's be clear about what he's calling for.

He's talking about electricity. Sorry for the fuzzy terminology. Cheers jakobovich, Bex gpuk

Follow Greenpeace UK