Leave it in the ground!

Posted by jossc — 13 June 2008 at 4:21pm - Comments

Coal protesters stop a train of the black stuff on its way to Drax, the UK's largest coal plant

Thirty climate campaigners today stopped a coal train on its way to Drax power station in Yorkshire, Britain's single largest source of CO2 emissions. Dressed in white overalls and canary outfits, they used safety signals to stop the train at a bridge on a branch line used exclusively by the power station, before jumping aboard and shovelling coal off onto the tracks. Some used climbing ropes to suspend themselves under the bridge from the train, making it impossible to move the train while the protest continues.

This is just the latest in a series of actions organised by anti-coal groups since the government announced plans to build a new generation of coal-fired power stations and develop new open-cast mines last year. Last week the Derbyshire based Leave it in the Ground group held a protest at the headquarters of UK Coal, the developers of an open-cast at Lodge House in Derbyshire, from which they plan to extract a million tonnes of coal over the next 5 years. A few days earlier protesters blockaded largest coal-fired power plant in Wales at Aberthaw, and students from the University of Warwick marched on energy utility E.ON's Coventry HQ to protest against their plans to build a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth in Kent.

It looks as though Al Gore's question "why aren't there rings of young people blocking bulldozers, preventing them from constructing coal-fired power plants?" is starting to find some traction. The third annual Fossil Fool's Day on April 1st this year saw a range of action against new coal plants and mines, including:

  • the shutting down one of Europe's largest open cast coal mines at Ffos-y-Fran in South Wales;
  • People and Planet building a 12ft high model of a coal-fired power station in Parliament Square;
  • a "laugh-in" at the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Dberr) over plans for a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth, Kent;
  • in Glasgow, Fossil Fools presented their local climate change criminals with awards recognising their contribution to climate chaos;
  • in Cambridge protesters targeted the Royal Bank of Scotland, one of the main financiers of climate crime.

The penny is dropping that the government and the big utilities and energy companies are not serious about tackling climate change. On the one hand, they sign up to international agreements committing the UK to reducing its CO2 emissions by at least 20 percent by 2020; on the other they embark on a series of new coal power plants and mines which, when completed, will render those 2020 targets completely unachievable.

They are relying on so-called 'clean-coal' technolgy to strip the CO2 from the coal and bury it underground - a technology which, even if it can eventually be made to work, will not be commercially available on a large scale for decades, by which time it will be too late. They are paying lip service to climate change but doing very little to minimise its impacts - and daring us to call them on it.

Fortunately, it looks as though there are now some new kids in town with different ideas, who think that that climate change impacts of coal and aviation are worth making a major fuss about, and who are not afraid to engage in a little strategic direct action to get their point across. Long may it continue. Hats off to you guys – and big love from Greenpeace.

Last time I looked the definition of a hypocrite was "someone who says one thing and does another." Like saying you are absolutely determined to help tackle climate change by dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, and then committing to build at least 8 new unabated coal power stations, and embarking on a programme of unfettered aviation expansion, for example (Mr Brown please take note).

Greenpeace is not saying (and has never said) that no one should ever fly, or use electricity. What we are saying is that continuing to produce power in such wasteful ways (over 60 per cent of the energy burned in centralised power plants is lost up the cooling towers) from such carbon intensive fuels is crazy given what we know about the likely effects of climate change - in fact its morally indefensible.

The people taking part in this action use electricity in their lives just like the rest of us. As a society we have little say over how most of the power we use is produced. The difference is that they've taken the trouble to research how the power they use is produced, realised the potentially disastrous consequences involved in continuing to produce it in this manner, and started lobbying vigorously for a saner alternative.

If your statement that:
"Coal has been the mainstay of power generation and it remains so as it is the cheapest and easiest source of energy."

is anything to go by you seem to be entirely happy with the status quo. Which is fine if you are in denial about (or don't care about) climate change - otherwise, given the weight of evidence building up on the subject, it sounds like a lazy and dangerous piece of thinking. For all the reasons why new unabated coal is the dirtiest and climate wrecking energy source we could choose, look here.

Finally, in regard to your point that:
"Taking this sort of action is moronic as the HSE will be all over the rail comapnies and it disrupts rail traffic."

The only disruption was to the 20 coal trains a day that feed Drax (37 of them had to be canceled over a two day period), since the power station has its own branch line, which was where the action took place. So there was no disruption to any other rail traffic.

Just for the record, a quick dip into Websters confirms that terrorist is the adjective or noun form of terrorism, which itself is defined as having the following meaning:

the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

Which I'd have to say rules us out, because:

a) as an organisation committed to non-violence we'd be hard pressed to 'terrorise' anybody, especially as we always inform the relevant authorities within minutes of taking action;

b) we are a relative minnow in a large pool of politically powerful governments and corporations around the globe, and therefore in no position to 'coerce' even if we wanted to - all we can do is lobby for sane and equitable solutions to the great environmental issues of the day.

But thanks anyway Gandalf for another of your brilliantly insightful comments which give us all here at Greenpeace Towers so much harmless pleasure...

Perfectly entitled to your opinion mate, just try and get your facts right - stopping this train was NOT a Greenpeace action, and if you can find any examples of us climbing on pensioners' roofs please send them in - only you can't because there aren't any.

To be honest, the 'terrorist' jibe is getting so stale it's untrue. It's generally people's motivation that is the best guide to their actions - would you call the Ploughshares women who broke into an RAF base and damaged Hawk fighters due for export to Indonesia (where they'd be used to murder dissenting East Timoreans) a few years back terrorists? Bet you would, even though they only did it to prevent a greater crime? In fact they were acquitted - the jury found in their favour. And that's what Greenpeace does when we take an action - our activists accept arrest and leave it to a jury of their peers to decide if they are guilty or not. You may not like it, but it is an honest, open position - and a million miles away from terrorism.

Oops, so Pauline Prescott's 65 - point to you. She also happened to be the wife of the Deputy Prime Minister at the time, who was the object of the protest, and who's failed climate change policies made him a totally legitimate political target.

So why exactly was she 'in fear of my life'? According to the BBC story you linked to:

"The court heard how a large number of Greenpeace demonstrators climbed over the gate of Mr and Mrs Prescott's home in Salthouse Road, Hull, where they were confronted by two armed police officers, who drew their weapons.

But they put their weapons back in their holsters when the intruders told them they were from Greenpeace.

The protesters then put ladders up the sides of the house and eight of them climbed on to the two "turrets" on either side of the front of the building."

So the Prescott house was under Police guard, and the Police knew the action was taking place before the protesters ever made it on to the roof - the police let them go up there because they knew they weren't terrorists - completely undermining your argument, I'm afraid.

And it's inconceivable that they didn't immediately inform Mrs Prescott of the fact, which makes her statements under oath seem disingenuous to say the least - just like your own in fact!

Hey Gandalf, sorry but your last comment got accidentally deleted. Please send again.

Last time I looked the definition of a hypocrite was "someone who says one thing and does another." Like saying you are absolutely determined to help tackle climate change by dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, and then committing to build at least 8 new unabated coal power stations, and embarking on a programme of unfettered aviation expansion, for example (Mr Brown please take note).

Greenpeace is not saying (and has never said) that no one should ever fly, or use electricity. What we are saying is that continuing to produce power in such wasteful ways (over 60 per cent of the energy burned in centralised power plants is lost up the cooling towers) from such carbon intensive fuels is crazy given what we know about the likely effects of climate change - in fact its morally indefensible.

The people taking part in this action use electricity in their lives just like the rest of us. As a society we have little say over how most of the power we use is produced. The difference is that they've taken the trouble to research how the power they use is produced, realised the potentially disastrous consequences involved in continuing to produce it in this manner, and started lobbying vigorously for a saner alternative.

If your statement that:
"Coal has been the mainstay of power generation and it remains so as it is the cheapest and easiest source of energy."

is anything to go by you seem to be entirely happy with the status quo. Which is fine if you are in denial about (or don't care about) climate change - otherwise, given the weight of evidence building up on the subject, it sounds like a lazy and dangerous piece of thinking. For all the reasons why new unabated coal is the dirtiest and climate wrecking energy source we could choose, look here.

Finally, in regard to your point that:
"Taking this sort of action is moronic as the HSE will be all over the rail comapnies and it disrupts rail traffic."

The only disruption was to the 20 coal trains a day that feed Drax (37 of them had to be canceled over a two day period), since the power station has its own branch line, which was where the action took place. So there was no disruption to any other rail traffic.

Just for the record, a quick dip into Websters confirms that terrorist is the adjective or noun form of terrorism, which itself is defined as having the following meaning:

the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

Which I'd have to say rules us out, because:

a) as an organisation committed to non-violence we'd be hard pressed to 'terrorise' anybody, especially as we always inform the relevant authorities within minutes of taking action;

b) we are a relative minnow in a large pool of politically powerful governments and corporations around the globe, and therefore in no position to 'coerce' even if we wanted to - all we can do is lobby for sane and equitable solutions to the great environmental issues of the day.

But thanks anyway Gandalf for another of your brilliantly insightful comments which give us all here at Greenpeace Towers so much harmless pleasure...

Perfectly entitled to your opinion mate, just try and get your facts right - stopping this train was NOT a Greenpeace action, and if you can find any examples of us climbing on pensioners' roofs please send them in - only you can't because there aren't any. To be honest, the 'terrorist' jibe is getting so stale it's untrue. It's generally people's motivation that is the best guide to their actions - would you call the Ploughshares women who broke into an RAF base and damaged Hawk fighters due for export to Indonesia (where they'd be used to murder dissenting East Timoreans) a few years back terrorists? Bet you would, even though they only did it to prevent a greater crime? In fact they were acquitted - the jury found in their favour. And that's what Greenpeace does when we take an action - our activists accept arrest and leave it to a jury of their peers to decide if they are guilty or not. You may not like it, but it is an honest, open position - and a million miles away from terrorism.

Oops, so Pauline Prescott's 65 - point to you. She also happened to be the wife of the Deputy Prime Minister at the time, who was the object of the protest, and who's failed climate change policies made him a totally legitimate political target.

So why exactly was she 'in fear of my life'? According to the BBC story you linked to:

"The court heard how a large number of Greenpeace demonstrators climbed over the gate of Mr and Mrs Prescott's home in Salthouse Road, Hull, where they were confronted by two armed police officers, who drew their weapons.

But they put their weapons back in their holsters when the intruders told them they were from Greenpeace.

The protesters then put ladders up the sides of the house and eight of them climbed on to the two "turrets" on either side of the front of the building."

So the Prescott house was under Police guard, and the Police knew the action was taking place before the protesters ever made it on to the roof - the police let them go up there because they knew they weren't terrorists - completely undermining your argument, I'm afraid.

And it's inconceivable that they didn't immediately inform Mrs Prescott of the fact, which makes her statements under oath seem disingenuous to say the least - just like your own in fact!

Hey Gandalf, sorry but your last comment got accidentally deleted. Please send again.

About Joss

Bass player and backing vox in the four piece beat combo that is the UK Greenpeace Web Experience. In my 6 years here I've worked on almost every campaign and been fascinated by them all to varying degrees. Just now I'm working on Peace and Oceans - which means getting rid of our Trident nuclear weapons system and creating large marine reserves so that marine life can get some protection from overfishing.

Follow Greenpeace UK