nuclear power

Nuclear Installations Inspectorate statement - Greenpeace response

Last edited 17 March 2011 at 6:22pm
17 March, 2011

Commenting on a statement released today by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate detailing the timeline for its review into nuclear safety, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

“It is welcome news that this review will be longer and wider in scope than was originally reported. The approval process for new nuclear power station should be suspended while we await the its findings.”

He added:

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

David Cameron's comments on nuclear emergency in Japan - Greenpeace response

Last edited 16 March 2011 at 5:33pm
16 March, 2011

Responding to comments today by Prime Minister David Cameron, and to continuing events in Japan, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

“The focus now for everybody should be on saving lives in Japan, and our thoughts in particular are with the heroic engineers working to reduce the impact of this nuclear accident.

"But it’s already clear that a new debate is taking shape here in Europe about the direction of our energy policy.

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

New nuclear industry subsidy - Greenpeace response

Last edited 24 January 2011 at 6:58pm
24 January, 2011

Commenting on the announcement of the Government will step in to underwrite insurance costs for new nuclear reactors, Ben Ayliffe of Greenpeace said:

“These proposals fly in the face of Energy Secretary Chris Huhne’s assurances that the coalition won’t subsidise new nuclear reactors. The planned revisions to nuclear insurance laws announced today amount to ministers conceding they need to provide a huge new public subsidy for an industry that has never been able to stand on its own feet.”

He added: 

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

What the green movement got right

Posted by jamess — 4 November 2010 at 7:26pm - Comments

Wind turbine construction in Butterwick

Channel 4 has broadcast another film bashing environmentalists, including Greenpeace.

We put science and practical solutions at the core of everything we do, which is why we're dismayed that Channel 4 would commission a programme littered with bad science and factual errors.

It's not just us saying it. Earlier this week statistics about climate change opinions from MORI had to be removed because they were misleading. Now one of the main contributors, Adam Werbach, is publically saying he was badly misled by Channel 4. If you'd like to read our response to the Channel 4 claims, go here.

Miliband energy announcements - Greenpeace responce

Last edited 9 November 2009 at 5:47pm
9 November, 2009

Commenting on energy minister Ed Miliband's announcements on more nuclear power stations today, Ben Ayliffe, head of Greenpeace's nuclear campaign, said:

"Miliband can name as many sites as he likes for new nuclear power stations, but the fact remains that the figures simply don't add up.

The NIA's application to justify new nuclear power stations: Greenpeace's response

Last edited 22 October 2009 at 11:45am
Publication date: 
22 March, 2009

This response is made to the Department of Energy and Climate Change's (DECC) Consultation on the Nuclear Industry Association's application to Justify new nuclear power stations and the linked application by the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA).

In summary, Greenpeace is of the view that new nuclear build, including all aspects of the new practices from uranium mining, reactor operations through to new waste creation and disposal, cannot be justified.

Download the report:

Follow Greenpeace UK