oil

What's Shell got to celebrate?

Posted by Richardg — 5 March 2013 at 7:10pm - Comments
All rights reserved. Credit: Rezac/Greenpeace
According to Shell's CEO in Alaska, #SpillsHappen

We've gatecrashed Shell's swanky party at the National Gallery (for the second year running). This time, we've helped Shell launch a new art exhibit, Annus Horribilis: New works in oil. Shell may have put its Arctic ambitions on hold but we won't stop until the frozen North is put out of their reach.

Win! VW has turned away from the Dark Side

Posted by jamie — 5 March 2013 at 6:52pm - Comments
Stormtroopers in London on the campaign launch
All rights reserved. Credit: David Sandison / Greenpeace
Half a million Jedi can't be wrong

After nearly two years of campaigning by more than 526,000 of you across the planet, VW has turned away from the Dark Side and committed to make cleaner and more efficient cars.

That means VW will also meet strong EU CO2 reduction targets.

This is big, because using less oil means less pollution, less impact on the climate and less pressure on vulnerable places like the Arctic.

How you made VW see the light

Posted by jamie — 5 March 2013 at 3:56pm - Comments

After nearly 2 years and 520,683 people pressuring VW, they've finally agreed to make cleaner and more efficient cars. VW announced that it will meet new EU car efficiency targets for 2020. That means its entire fleet will average 95g/km (about 4 litres/100km) per vehicle by 2020. VW is Europe’s biggest car-maker, the seconde biggest in the world, so this is big news. Using less oil means less pollution, less impact on the climate and less pressure on vulnerable places like the Arctic. Here's how you made it happen...

Shell pulls out of Arctic for 2013 - Greenpeace responds

Last edited 27 February 2013 at 9:41pm
27 February, 2013

Commenting on the news tonight that Shell is pulling out of the Arctic for this year, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Out in the Cold - Key questions for Shell on its Alaskan Arctic programme

Last edited 14 January 2013 at 11:16am
On 8th January 2013, the U.S. Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, announced a review of the 2012 Alaskan Arctic offshore drilling programme “to review practices and identify challenges as well as lessons learned.” The review to be completed within 60 days will focus on the successive setbacks encountered by Shell during 2012. These include its failure to secure timely certification of its containment ship, the Arctic Challenger, the failure of safety testing on its containment dome; operational issues with its drilling rig the Noble Discoverer and the running aground of its other drilling rig the Kulluk on 31st December 2012.

8 reasons why Shell can't be trusted in the Arctic

Posted by Fran G — 3 January 2013 at 3:54pm - Comments
Shell's Arctic oil rig runs aground in Alaska
All rights reserved. Credit: US Coast Guard
Shell's Arctic oil rig hits the rocks. Should we trust them with the Arctic?

Shell's most recent 'mishap' a few days ago was not the first setback the oil giant has suffered in its plans to drill for oil in the Arctic. In fact, it's the eighth in a growing list of reasons why Shell should not be trusted in the Arctic.

Greenpeace MPs briefing: Evidence Session with Arctic Oil Industry, 14th March 2012

Last edited 3 January 2013 at 12:40pm
Publication date: 
14 March, 2012

This document provides an analysis of Shell’s oil spill response plan for the exploratory wells that the company is drilling in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, Alaska. Shell and Cairn Energy both appeared before the UK parliamentary Environmental Audit Committee to face questions about their ability to contain and clean up an oil spill as well as preventing one from occurring in the first place.

Download the report:

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Follow Greenpeace UK