waste

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

The Weekly Geek: anaerobic digestion

Posted by bex — 20 February 2008 at 12:59pm - Comments

Ken Livingstone wants it for London, Hilary Benn is giving money to it and Adam and Debbie are bringing it to Ambridge. After a couple of millennia in the sidelines, anaerobic digestion has finally hit the big time (well, The Archers, anyway) - which is why we've chosen it for this second edition of the Weekly Geek.

Every year, we bury thousands of tonnes of waste food in landfill sites around the UK. We produce almost one and a half million tonnes of sewage a year (don't do the maths - it's disturbing), which is mostly spread on land, incinerated or buried as landfill. And we produce enormous amounts of agricultural waste on our farms. All of this waste breaks down to release greenhouse gases as it decomposes.

Nuclear power - the problems

Last edited 15 November 2006 at 1:26pm

A radiation warning sign in Chernaya, near Chernobyl

The government wants to build new nuclear power stations. If their plan succeeds, it will be at the cost of blocking the real solutions to climate change and a reliable future energy supply. It will also result in the continued production of dangerous nuclear waste and an increased risk from terrorism, radioactive accident and nuclear proliferation.

Activists block waste train bound for Sellafield

Posted by bex — 23 September 2003 at 8:00am - Comments
Italian activist arrested after stopping a nuclear waste train bound for Sellafield

Italian activist arrested after stopping a nuclear waste train bound for Sellafield

Greenpeace takes Tuwaitha radiation to heart of administration in Iraq

Last edited 4 July 2003 at 8:00am
4 July, 2003
Radiation Barrels are Presented to Iraqi Administration in Iraq

Radiation Barrels are Presented to Iraqi Administration in Iraq

UK hand forced over radioactive discharges

Last edited 26 June 2003 at 8:00am
26 June, 2003

An international meeting of Environment Ministers ended today with the UK being forced to accept, in writing, the concerns of European countries over radioactive discharges into the North Seas (1) from the Sellafield nuclear installation in Cumbria.

London had previously successfully resisted attempts to record criticism of the UK's failure to meet its commitments to reduce radioactive discharges at the OSPAR conference (2,3). Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden were particularly critical of the UK's role.

OSPAR and radioactive discharges from Sellafield

Last edited 17 June 2003 at 8:00am
Publication date: 
11 August, 2009

Publication date: June 2003

Summary
The UK's Environment Minister will be in Bremen, Germany, on June 25th and 26th for a meeting of the signatories to the OSPAR Convention (the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic).

Download the report:

UK Government leaves us at the mercy of BNFL on Technetium-99 emissions

Last edited 13 December 2002 at 9:00am
13 December, 2002

The UK Government must impose a moratorium on the discharges of the radioactive chemical Technetium-99 (Tc-99) from Sellafield now, and not leave us to the mercy of British Nuclear Fuels' (BNFL) research programme.

The UK Government's decision (1) yesterday to consult on proposals to consider whether a moratorium on the discharge of Tc-99 from the Sellafield site is feasible whilst research on abatement technology is carried out, is too little, too late, according to Greenpeace.

New nuclear reactors - more radioactive waste

Posted by bex — 29 July 2002 at 8:00am - Comments
Map of nuclear Britian

Map of nuclear Britian

UK radioactive discharge plan means business as usual - UK still the 'dirty man of Europe'

Last edited 24 July 2002 at 8:00am
24 July, 2002

Greenpeace said today that the Government's new strategy to reduce radioactive discharges into the sea was not good enough to protect human health or the marine environment. In 1998 the UK signed up to the OSPAR Agreement, for the substantial reduction of radioactive discharges into the sea and in doing so claimed it was no longer the 'dirty man of Europe'.

Greenpeace says the new strategy fails OSPAR and the environment for three reasons:

Follow Greenpeace UK