GM crops

FSA to debate GM foods in the UK

Last edited 4 April 2003 at 9:00am

The Food Standards Agency (FSA), the UK's food watchdog headed by Sir John Krebs, is currently running a debate on GM foods. Part of their debate involves holding a "citizen's jury" on whether GM foods should be available to buy in the UK, and this is being broadcast live on the web. Strangely, however, the FSA debate is being run separately from the independent GM public debate, which kicks off at the end of May.

Food standards agency attacked over breakaway GM debate

Last edited 5 March 2003 at 9:00am
5 March, 2003

Krebs debate 'as legitimate as a marriage guidance seminar run by Henry the Eighth'

Monsanto out of our food

Last edited 28 January 2003 at 9:00am
Publication date: 
21 March, 2007

A Greenpeace International briefing prepared for the World Social Forum Porto Alegre, Brazil

Publication date: January 2003

Summary
Monsanto is the leading company responsible for contaminating the environment with genetically engineered (GE) crops. Its products accounted for over 90% of the total area planted with GE crops in the world in 2001.

Download the report:

Monsanto: Get out of our food

Last edited 28 January 2003 at 9:00am
Percy Schmeiser is being sued by Monsanto

Percy Schmeiser is being sued by Monsanto

Greenpeace comments on GM sugar beet research

Last edited 20 January 2003 at 9:00am
Farm Scale Trials

Farm Scale Trials

A new UK report, A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit", has claimed that growing GM sugar beet in the UK significantly increases the amount of wildlife in fields. The research was done by Brooms Barn Research Station and was part-funded by Monsanto, but "independently" assessed. It was based on modifying the herbicide regime for GM Roundup Ready sugar beet and claimed that later, more targeted spraying produced more weeds, hence more insects and eventually better response from bird populations. However, the data was very incomplete, and the timing of the herbicide application was absolutely crucial. It showed that early application resulted in an increased yield, but significantly less biodiversity improvement. Late application meant lower yields, but higher wildlife dividends.

GM Science Review - spin not substance

Last edited 29 November 2002 at 9:00am
29 November, 2002

The Government's public debate on Genetically Modified (GM) crops staggered on today, with the announcement of those scientists chosen to form the Science Review Panel, a select body of experts charged with overseeing the Science Review strand of the debate.

Greenpeace statement on the Southern African food crisis

Last edited 1 November 2002 at 9:00am
Crop: maize

Crop: maize

November 2002

Greenpeace's position on the potential food crisis in Southern Africa is clear: if it comes down to a choice between people eating GM maize or facing starvation we would urge affected states to distribute milled GM maize. To take any other position would be morally unjustifiable.

Greenpeace has never lobbied African countries to reject GM food aid or offered any advice on agricultural affairs. However, some countries have consistently voiced their concerns over GM food. We believe that even in emergency situations, international relations cannot be based upon a rule of

Save our seeds!

Last edited 28 August 2002 at 8:00am
A field of organic crops

A field of organic crops

Government announces GM debate - but are they serious?

Last edited 29 July 2002 at 8:00am
Soya

Soya

Record Harvest - Record Hunger:

Last edited 10 June 2002 at 8:00am
GM grain

GM grain

Argentinean experience shows genetically engineered crops contribute to poverty

As the world