hinkley

7 Questions EDF Needs to Answer About Hinkley Nuclear Plant

Posted by Kate Blagojevic — 22 March 2016 at 12:56pm - Comments
by-nc. Credit: Samuel Keyte / Greenpeace
We've been campaigning for the government to drop Hinkley and invest in renewable energy instead

Tomorrow morning, the saga that is Hinkley nuclear power station is set to continue as executives from EDF will face a grilling from MPs in parliament.

New petition: Stop Hinkley nuclear plant and spend the money on renewable instead

Posted by Richard Casson — 7 March 2016 at 7:49pm - Comments
by-nc. Credit: Samuel Keyte / Greenpeace

If you tuned into the news this morning you might have heard how Hinkley nuclear plant has suffered a further blow. The finance director for EDF, the French energy firm that plans to build the nuclear reactor, has resigned amid rumours that going ahead with the new nuclear plant could leave the company in ruins.

Panic inside EDF board puts Hinkley power station at risk

Last edited 26 January 2016 at 5:50pm
26 January, 2016

 Reports of unprecedented dissent and panic amongst the EDF board have been reported ahead of tomorrow’s board meeting.

 It is understood that the decision whether to invest £24.5 billion into the Hinkley power station in Somerset hangs on a knife edge. A key management level trade union, CFE-CGC, who sit on the board, have issued 15 questions raising financial, legal and strategic concerns over whether EDF can afford the project, or deliver it on time.(1)

Hinkley C - Greenpeace statement and briefing

Last edited 21 October 2013 at 10:23am
21 October, 2013

In response to the announcement of the Hinkley deal, Greenpeace UK Executive Director John Sauven said:

“Hinkley C fails every test – economic, consumer, and environmental. It will lock a generation of consumers into higher energy bills, via a strike price that’s nearly double the current price of electricity, and it will distort energy policy by displacing newer, cleaner, technologies that are dropping dramatically in price.

Community benefits from nuclear reactors - Greenpeace response

Last edited 17 July 2013 at 11:59am
17 July, 2013

In response to the announcement from Minister of State for Energy Michael Fallon that the benefits for 'local communities hosting new nuclear power stations' would be funded by DECC,  Dr Doug Parr, Chief Scientist at Greenpeace UK, said –

“Whilst wind farms and even shale gas developers have to pay community benefits, only nuclear stations will get a fat taxpayer subsidy to fund them. Our entire energy policy is now absurdly distorted by the desperation to prop up EDF’s faltering Hinkley C project, with the government piling the costs onto the taxpayer to avoid the embarrassment of admitting they backed the wrong technology. We can’t go on like this.”

ENDS

Energy Review update 10

Last edited 23 May 2007 at 11:28am
Publication date: 
23 May, 2007

In this issue:

Download the report:

Scientists map flooding risk to nuclear sites

Last edited 8 March 2007 at 3:45pm
8 March, 2007

The impact of rising sea levels on Dungeness nuclear power station

Nuclear power stations are at risk from significant sea-level rises and storm surges in the future. Many existing and proposed sites are not suitable locations for new nuclear reactors, according to a report by flood experts.

Follow Greenpeace UK