forests
Posted by jamie — 18 March 2008 at 7:12pm
-
Boarding the Galina III yesterday © Greenpeace/Karl Joseph
Yesterday afternoon, the crew of one of our
ships - the Arctic Sunrise - swung into action in the French port of Caen.
Their mission: to prevent a shipment of Amazon timber, acquired from companies
linked to illegal logging activities, from entering the EU. And after nearly 24
hours, they're still going strong.
The timber is aboard the Galina III and, as it
tried to enter the port, five Greenpeace volunteers (including a group from the
UK)
climbed aboard where they attached themselves to two of the ship's cranes.
Since then, the Galina has been unable to dock to unload its cargo, a mixture of
timber species with wonderfully exotic names: amarelao, macaranduba, ipe,
garapeira, cumaru and jarana to name a few. And as I write, the team on the
cranes is still holding out.
Posted by jamie — 3 March 2008 at 7:09pm
-
Greenpeace volunteers and Lake Murray clansmen marking out boundaries in 2006
Long-time readers may remember that two years
ago a team of Greenpeace campaigners and volunteers arrived at Lake Murray
in Papua New Guinea
to establish a forest rescue station. They were invited by local clans to help
mark out and document the boundaries of their traditional lands, and also to
train people in eco-forestry techniques.
Last week, the first fruits of that project were
delivered in the form of a shipment of timber from Lake
Murray arriving in Sydney. Sep Galeva, a landowner and one of
the key players in the eco-timber project, explained to the press how working
on this community initiative has helped protect their part of the rainforest
from industrial logging.
Posted by jamie — 29 February 2008 at 12:45pm
-
An illegal logging camp in the Amazon © Greenpeace/Daniel Beltra
Stung by the recent rise in deforestation
rates in the Amazon, the Brazilian government is cracking down on the illegal
loggers who are ripping up the rainforest; their year-long initiative - known as
Operation Fire Belt - is targeting areas where deforestation has been most
acute.
Posted by jamie — 28 January 2008 at 6:56pm
-
The guys at Biofuelwatch have been cooking up a week of protests around (what else?) biofuels. Like us, they're concerned about the rising demand for biodiesel etc and the implications that has for the climate, as well as deforestation, food prices and a host of other related issues.
Posted by jamie — 25 January 2008 at 4:21pm
-
Last year, we heard the excellent
news that the rate of deforestation in the Amazon had dropped for the third
consecutive year. However, yesterday came
the rather less welcome news that those rates had changed and have moved in an
upward direction.
Posted by jamie — 21 January 2008 at 5:52pm
-
Yet more
questions have been raised in political circles about biofuel targets.
Following last week's statements from the European environment commissioner,
Defra's chief scientist and the Royal Society, a parliamentary committee has
released its own report which says that pursuing mandatory targets without any
form of sustainability criteria attached is not a good idea.
Posted by jamie — 14 January 2008 at 7:11pm
-

We could be witnessing a seismic and very exciting shift in how UK and EU policies on biofuels are being perceived in official circles. Both the EU Environment Commissioner and Defra's own chief scientist today went on record to say that current plans to vastly increase the amount of fuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel might need to be reconsidered.
Last edited 14 January 2008 at 4:57pm
The environmental credentials of "first generation" biofuels were today thrown
into serious doubt after the European commissioner, DEFRA's chief scientist and
the Royal Society all expressed concern over their sustainability and
effectiveness.
Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a
Last edited 11 December 2007 at 3:15pm
Responding to the news that the UK government is set to commit £15m to a World Bank scheme which aims to reduce tropical deforestation, John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK said:
"It would be unthinkable for the next phase of the Kyoto protocol not to address tropical deforestation, which is one of the biggest drivers of climate change. But world leaders can't use this as an excuse to avoid slashing emissions in their own countries - we urgently need to do both.