nuclear power

Energy price hikes? Brace yourself for more if Brown goes nuclear

Posted by bex — 7 January 2008 at 6:15pm - Comments

See all updates about nuclear power.


Now here's a surprise: the government was being 'economic' with the truth when it promised that we, the taxpayers, wouldn't have to foot the extortionate bill for new nuclear power.

It turns out that we, the consumers, will be picking up our fair share.

Yep, the day after the papers reported a 15 per cent energy price hike, we're being told to brace ourselves for more hikes if the government succeeds in dragging us down the nuclear road.

Industry insiders attack government's second nuclear consultation

Last edited 4 January 2008 at 2:06pm
4 January, 2008

Leading experts side with Greenpeace; process now "vulnerable to legal challenge"

A new report from a coalition of top nuclear industry experts has accused the UK Government of failing the British public by conducting a second flawed consultation into the future of nuclear power in this country.

Industry insiders give Brown a drubbing on nuclear

Posted by bex — 4 January 2008 at 12:53pm - Comments

See all updates about nuclear power.


We've been banging on about the sham nuclear 'consultation' for ages now, but today 17 scientists, academics and nuclear industry insiders piled into the debate, giving Gordon Brown a drubbing over well, pretty much everything to do with nuclear power.

I wanted to share a few highlights from their report but the arguments are so compelling I just couldn't stop cutting and pasting. So here, have more quotes about nuclear power than you can shake a stick at, or read the full report for yourself at www.nuclearconsult.com:


"An accumulating public sense of a lack of independence and a lack of transparency behind government initiatives in this area, and a hidden industry agenda belittling the problems seem to emit a strong whiff of mortgaging the long-term future to short-term interests. The issue is one of trust in government..."

Dr Paul Dorfman, University of Warwick
Prof Brian Wynne, University of Lancaster

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Government issued with clear legal threat over nuclear power

Last edited 10 December 2007 at 4:10pm
10 December, 2007

The government was today issued with a fresh legal threat from Greenpeace over a new fleet of nuclear power stations.

Greenpeace lawyers have contacted the government, saying "it would not be lawful" for the government to make a decision in favour of building new nuclear power stations.

Another legal threat for the government over nuclear plans

Posted by jamie — 10 December 2007 at 3:59pm - Comments

When you make a mistake, you tend to learn from the experience so you can avoid making similar blunders in the future. Not so the current government which, if it backs a new generation of nuclear power stations, could once again find itself at odds with the law.

Back in February, we took the government to the High Court over its first attempt to hold a public consultation on the future of nuclear power. The court found in our favour, ruling that the consultation was "unlawful" and "seriously flawed". It forced ministers back to the drawing board for a second consultation but once again it's been shaped and guided by a predetermined outcome: the UK will have new nuclear power stations. Members of the public who attended the consultation meetings posted messages on this site about how they felt attendees were lead into finding in favour of nuclear power.

The New Rush for Nuclear: An Expensive White Elephant

Last edited 29 November 2007 at 6:59pm
Publication date: 
29 November, 2007

The UK government and nuclear industry claim that a new generation of nuclear power stations can be built without any public subsidy. They point to Finland, where the first new reactor ordered in Europe since 1993 is being built, and to the US as proof of a re-emerging industry.

Download the report:

An expensive white, radioactive elephant

Posted by jamie — 29 November 2007 at 6:54pm - Comments

Ever since the government started ranting about the joy of new nuclear power stations, a central plank of their shaky argument has been that the billions required will be covered by industry and not the taxpayer. But despite these bold claims, legislation and loopholes have been carefully engineered so that public money will inevitably subsidise the industry. Hardly surprising, given there hasn't been a single civil nuclear project that hasn't required huge sums of public dosh.

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Gordon Brown's CBI speech: Greenpeace reaction

Last edited 26 November 2007 at 6:34pm
26 November, 2007

Reacting to Gordon Brown's speech to the CBI this morning, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

"The prime minister last week outlined plans to generate twenty per cent of our energy from renewable sources, now just one week later we are back to the old mantra of nuclear power. Declarations like this threaten to strangle the renewables industry before it can even get close to that 2020 target."

Follow Greenpeace UK