energy review

A personal account of the government's nuclear consultation

Posted by jamie — 12 September 2007 at 10:40am - Comments

The government's public consultation on the future of nuclear power in this country - part of its shambolic energy review - was held on Saturday, but no one from Greenpeace was there. Along with several other organisations, we withdrew from the process as its become clear it's just another stitch-up in the government's attempts to force nuclear power on us.

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a

Energy Review update 11

Last edited 2 July 2007 at 1:04pm
Publication date: 
2 July, 2007

In this issue:

Download the report:

Why Tony Blair is wrong about nuclear power

Posted by bex — 23 May 2007 at 1:12pm - Comments

Melting ice

Today, the government has finally published its energy white paper. After last year's energy consultation was ruled "seriously flawed", "misleading" and "manifestly inadequate and unfair" by a High Court Judge, this white paper outlines a new energy policy - and a new nuclear consultation.

Yep, despite a few ineffectual concessions to renewables and efficiency, Tony Blair is still busily spinning the nuclear industry's line: that nuclear power is the answer to climate change. And we still think he's dangerously wrong.

Energy Review update 10

Last edited 23 May 2007 at 11:28am
Publication date: 
23 May, 2007

In this issue:

Download the report:

Greenpeace on Planning White Paper

Last edited 21 May 2007 at 6:00pm
21 May, 2007

Reacting to the publication by Ruth Kelly of a Planning White Paper, Greenpeace Director John Sauven said:

Energy Review update 9

Last edited 21 May 2007 at 5:43pm
Publication date: 
21 May, 2007

In this issue:

1. Greenpeace High Court victory exposes ‘seriously flawed’ nuclear consultation
2. Nuclear reactor sites liable to flooding
3. Nuclear utilities carry on regardless
4. Scottish political consensus against nuclear and for decentralised energy
5. Finnish reactor over budget and behind schedule
6. Energy White Paper set for 23rd May launch
7. British Energy’s cracked reactor bits
8. Green energy blueprint
9. Still no waste solution
10. Nuclear Tsar appointed - negotiations undermine consultation

Download the report:

Energy white paper to be published

Last edited 18 May 2007 at 12:49pm
18 May, 2007

In February, a High Court judge described Tony Blair’s energy review as "seriously flawed", "misleading" and "manifestly inadequate and unfair". Mr Justice Sullivan ruled in favour of Greenpeace - which had brought a judicial review - declaring the energy review process unlawful.

Nuclear consultation: full and fair?

Last edited 14 May 2007 at 10:23am
Publication date: 
9 May, 2007

As a result of Greenpeace’s successful legal challenge to the 2006 energy review consultation process, the government has been forced back to the drawing board to conduct what should be a comprehensive and necessarily lengthy review on whether to support new nuclear plants.

This short paper sets out some of the key questions which must be addressed as part of this consultation, and some of the information requirements to support a proper consultation on a new build nuclear programme.

 

Download the report:

Follow Greenpeace UK