Posted by jossc — 26 June 2008 at 5:23pm
-
Comments
Offshore wind - 3,500 new turbines by 2020?
Although the PM has taken a few verbal pastings from us over the past few months on key climate issues like airport expansion and new coal-fired power stations, in a new speech today he did much to redeem himself by announcing an ambitious plan to ensure Britain generates 15 per cent of its energy from renewable sources by 2020.
To be sure, the government has promised as much in the past and failed to deliver, but there seemed to be something different about today's Renewable Energy Strategy Consultation - some meat on the bones which indicated that the plan might just be more than empty rhetoric. The government is consulting on ambitious plans designed to allow the UK to meet its share of an overall EU target to generate 20 per cent of energy (electricity, heat and transport) from renewables within 12 years.
Posted by jossc — 9 June 2008 at 3:14pm
-
Comments
Sweden has the best overall record on a range of environ- mental and social issues
As Euro 2008 kicks off in Austria and Switzerland this week with no British teams involved, a new quick web guide has appeared to help us decide which of the remaining 16 competing nations most deserves our support. Who should I Cheer For sensibly ignores footballing talent and instead ranks each country by ten criteria including spending on health, aid and the military, carbon emissions and renewable energy production.
Figures for the UK are also included in the list for comparative purposes and, guess what, we don't come out too well, particularly on the key climate change factors. The UK has the third highest carbon emissions (10.2 tonnes per person) behind the Netherlands and Germany, and comes joint last in terms of electricity generated from renewables (just 4 per cent).
Reacting to comments by Business Secretary John Hutton, calling for Britain to become a low carbon economy, Greenpeace climate campaigner Joss Garman said:
Posted by jossc — 31 March 2008 at 3:55pm
-
Comments
Business secretary John Hutton's plans to see a new coal-fired power station under construction this summer suffered a significant setback after E.ON, the company behind the proposed plant at Kingsnorth in Kent, asked him to delay
the decision on whether the plant should be built.
Until now Hutton's Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Dberr) and E.ON had both been pushing for a decision to be made by 'end May 2008 at latest'. According to documents obtained by Greenpeace under the FoI Act, E.ON's plans were so advanced that contractors had already been secured to commence building work 'from summer 2008 on current tenders'.
Posted by jossc — 31 March 2008 at 2:55pm
-
Comments
Energy minister John Hutton has been caught trying to sabotage the EU renewable energy targets again. A minister from Hutton's department has been working in Brussels to try and redefine what constitutes 'renewable energy.' After last year's fiasco when Hutton’s department were seen trying to wreck EU renewable targets altogether, now the business minister Lady Vadera has been filmed trying to water them down at an EU energy council meeting.
The ROCA 3 CHP plant in Rotterdam provides electricty and heat to 400,000 homes
Due to popular demand (well, demand anyway), The Weekly Geek now has its very own RSS feed.
Back in 1882, Thomas
Edison built the United
States' first electric power plant. Pearl Street Station, which
supplied the good folks of Lower Manhattan
with electricity for lighting and steam for manufacturing, was around 50 per
cent efficient.
125 years on, the typical
UK
power plant is just 38 per cent efficient. But those modern power plants that
have been built on the same principles as Edison's
are reaching efficiency levels of up to 95 per cent.
So how did Edison do it? And where are we going so wrong?
In this week's slightly
tardy Weekly Geek,
we're looking at combined heat and power (CHP): the system Edison
was using, and the heart of any truly clean and efficient decentralised energy
system. (Those who read the first Weekly Geek on decentralised energy may notice a fair bit of crossover.)
Posted by bex — 27 February 2008 at 9:23pm
-
Comments
It's Weekly Geek time, and this week we're looking at micro-hydro power: a truly reliable, highly efficient, and extremely clean (it has no direct carbon emissions) way of generating electricity.
It needs no fuel but offers a constant supply of electricity which often increases in winter, along with demand. It has a long life cycle (typically 25 years or more). It can have low implementation and maintenance costs. And, unlike some large scale hydroelectric power schemes, it has minimal environmental and visual impacts.
Posted by bex — 13 February 2008 at 3:16pm
-
Comments
This combined heat and power plant in Denmark is up to 95 per cent efficient
To celebrate our launch of EfficienCity, we're starting a new, weekly column for all the closet energy geeks out there. Every week, we'll take an in-depth look at one of the technologies we feature in EfficienCity - tidal power, wave power, wind energy, combined heat and power, micro-hydro power, anaerobic digestion, biomass and the rest. We'll also be looking at issues like baseload and the regulatory context for decentralised energy.
So remember to check back each Wednesday and, if you have any suggestions for energy solutions to climate change you'd like to see us cover, just post a comment at the bottom of this page and we'll try to slot it in.
Posted by bex — 7 February 2008 at 2:15pm
-
Comments
Visit EfficienCity, our climate friendly town
If a picture speaks a thousand words, a multimedia-packed, animation-filled interactive town must speak a million. Which is why we've launched EfficienCity - to explain exactly what decentralised energy is and how it works in practice (which can otherwise be a wordy business).
Greenpeace has launched aninteractive virtual city
showcasing how towns and cities across the
UK are fighting climate change and
enjoying a cleaner and more secure energy future - without relying on new coal
or nuclear power stations.