climate change
Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a
Posted by bex — 4 January 2008 at 12:53pm
-
See all updates about nuclear power.
We've been banging on about the sham nuclear 'consultation' for ages now, but today 17 scientists, academics and nuclear industry insiders piled into the debate, giving Gordon Brown a drubbing over well, pretty much everything to do with nuclear power.
I wanted to share a few highlights from their report but the arguments are so compelling I just couldn't stop cutting and pasting. So here, have more quotes about nuclear power than you can shake a stick at, or read the full report for yourself at www.nuclearconsult.com:
"An accumulating public sense of a lack of independence and a lack of transparency behind government initiatives in this area, and a hidden industry agenda belittling the problems seem to emit a strong whiff of mortgaging the long-term future to short-term interests. The issue is one of trust in government..."
Dr Paul Dorfman, University of Warwick
Prof Brian Wynne, University of Lancaster
Posted by bex — 3 January 2008 at 3:50pm
-
E.ON is arguing for its new coal plant on the basis that it will include carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. So, is CCS is a silver bullet? Or is it just another false solution, touted by an industry desperately trying to stay relevant in a carbon constrained world?
CCS is a means of separating out carbon dioxide when burning fossil
fuels, and then dumping it - underground, or else at or under the sea bed.
CCS isn't commercially viable; there are no commercially operating CCS plants in the world. And for all the industry's obfuscation, the new plant at Kingsnorth won't be able to capture and store carbon; it will
just be ready to incorporate CCS should the technology ever become
viable in the future.
Last edited 3 January 2008 at 12:07pm
Gordon Brown today faces his biggest test since pledging to put Britain at the forefront of efforts to combat climate change, after a proposal to build the UK's first coal fired power station in over thirty years landed on his desk.
E.ON's application to build the station at Kingsnorth was given the go-ahead by Medway council last night. The Tory controlled authority has raised no objection to a plant that would emit over eight million tonnes of carbon dioxide every year. Now the final decision on a UK coal resurgence will be made by Brown.
Posted by bex — 3 January 2008 at 11:15am
-
It will be the UK's first new coal fired power plant in 34 years. It will emit as much carbon dioxide as the 30 least polluting nations in the world combined. And the world's leading climate scientist has called it "a tipping point for the world".
The proposal for a new coal-fired power plant at Kingsnorth in Kent has been given the go-ahead by Medway Council. At a meeting last night, only three of the 16 councillers objected to E.ON's application,
meaning that the plant - which will generate electricity in the most
climate-wrecking way known to humankind - has been approved, potentially starting a new coal rush in the UK.
Posted by bex — 2 January 2008 at 2:14pm
-
2007 is being hailed as the year in which the environmental movement turned a corner and climate change leapt to the top of the agenda. Al Gore and the IPCC won the Nobel Peace Prize; Climate Camp became a household name; and an unsuspecting humpback whale named Mister Splashy Pants became a global phenomenon.
So what were you most interested in? This list of our ten most-read blogs on our website last year (well, since we launched the blog in April) shows, unsurprisingly, that for most of our readers, it was climate change, climate change, climate change. Oh, and Mister Splashy Pants...
1. The Convenient Solution
The energy debate ruled a lot of 2007, and our film on nuclear power vs decentralised energy was far and away our most popular blog of the year, with around three times more traffic than any other story. With the government about to make its announcement on nuclear (again), the debate's as relevant now as it was then - so it's worth a watch if you haven't seen it yet.
Posted by jossc — 2 January 2008 at 12:53pm
-
The Heathrow expansion
consultation is a complete sham and a blatant stitch up from start to finish -
it excludes any consideration of the most important issue - climate change - and
is essentially a cosmetic exercise to allow the government to implement a
decision they have already made with a pretence of having consulted with
stakeholders. There are other ways of trying to influence this issue which we
feel are far more likely to be effective, and you can find them by visiting our Stop Heathrow Expansion homepage.
Posted by bex — 2 January 2008 at 12:40pm
-
Last edited 1 January 1970 at 1:00am
n/a
Last edited 20 December 2007 at 2:03pm
EUROPEAN environment ministers are today expected to ditch plans to place caps on aviation emissions - the fastest growing source of global warming gases.
Instead, airlines such as BA are expected to be handed permits to pollute, with the chance to buy more permits from outside the airline industry in order to increase their emissions.