decentralised energy

Powering London into the 21st Century

Last edited 16 March 2006 at 9:00am
Publication date: 
16 March, 2006

This report is a response to the government's Energy Review. It does not seek to provide all the answers to the many questions that this review poses, but it does demonstrate that there is at least one viable set of options for achieving the government's key goals of CO2 emission reductions, a secure energy supply, economic growth, and alleviation of fuel poverty - without the need for a new generation of nuclear power stations.

Download the report:

Mayor Rejects Nuclear London

Last edited 16 March 2006 at 9:00am
16 March, 2006

This Thursday (16th March) Ken Livingstone will criticise proposals for building new nuclear power stations across the UK as he outlines his vision for a low carbon London at the Greenpeace Business Lecture.

Addressing business leaders at the Greenpeace lecture the Mayor will launch a new report, Powering London into the 21st century. The report details how decentralising London's energy would be far more efficient in cutting the city's CO2 emissions, and the demand for imported gas as opposed to pursuing a centralised nuclear power focused national energy policy (1).

Decentralising energy - the Woking case study

Last edited 16 March 2006 at 9:00am
Publication date: 
16 March, 2006

Summary

Woking Borough Council is at the forefront of the decentralised energy revolution in the UK. By decentralising its energy, Woking Council has slashed its energy use by nearly half, and its CO2 emissions by a massive 77 per cent since 1990.

Download the report:

Cleaner, cheaper, more secure - a new report reveals the real answer to Britain's energy needs

Posted by bex — 7 March 2006 at 9:00am - Comments

A residential area powered by combined heat and power (decentralised energy)

As the government's Energy Review veers ever closer to the conclusion that nuclear power is the only answer to climate change, a new report by non-profit research agency the World Alliance for Decentralised Energy (WADE) demolishes this myth.

Decentralising UK Energy

Last edited 7 March 2006 at 9:00am
Publication date: 
7 March, 2007

Cleaner, Cheaper, More Secure Energy for the 21st Century

Summary
The new Greenpeace commissioned report, Decentralising UK Energy, demolishes the myth that nuclear power is the best or only option in tackling climate change and shows that a real, more effective, more viable choice is available. Not only is decentralised energy cleaner and cheaper than nuclear power - it's also more secure; we don't need nuclear power.

Download the report:

Greenpeace reaction to energy review

Last edited 23 January 2006 at 9:00am
23 January, 2006

Reacting to this morning's launch of a new energy review, Greenpeace executive director Stephen Tindale said:

"It's now clear that Ministers are asking the wrong questions. Instead of asking how Britain can make its energy system more efficient, this review is only looking at what kind of fuel we use to generate electricity.

"The UK has an electricity grid designed seventy years ago that wastes most of the fuel we put into it. What we need is an energy revolution, a grid that lets renewable schemes and energy efficiency measures meet their full potential.

Nuclear power and energy security

Posted by bex — 5 January 2006 at 9:00am - Comments

The Budget: a chance to combat climate change

The UK will shortly become a net importer of gas, as the North Sea fields which have given us over 20 years of self-sufficiency finally begin to run dry; production is decreasing so that we are now a net importer, rather than a net exporter. The recent attempt by the Russian Government, Europe's major gas supplier, to hike the price of the gas it supplies to neighbouring Ukraine (the first step on the pipeline route to Western Europe) has led to intense media speculation over the security of supplies to the UK - in effect the argument is that since we cannot rely on a stable supply of gas, we should press ahead with a new generation of nuclear power plants which would guarantee energy security.

2005 Energy Review - Blair sinks renewables and spins nuclear

Last edited 29 November 2005 at 9:00am
Publication date: 
29 November, 2005

Summary

The nuclear industry is portraying new nuclear power stations as the solution to climate change and security of energy supply. In reality, nuclear power will fail to deliver significant CO2 cuts, be hugely expensive, create a new target for terrorism, is unreliable and a finite source of energy.

Download the report:

Volunteers on trial for Prescott Solar panel gift

Posted by bex — 2 November 2005 at 9:00am - Comments

Greenpeace volunteers with solar panel on Prescott's roof


UPDATE - verdict in:
Eight Greenpeace volunteers expressed disappointment at being found guilty by Hull Magistrates Court of charges relating to a protest on April 26th this year during which they installed solar panels on the roof of Deputy PM John Prescott's Hull residence.

No New Nuclear Power: Greenpeace Submission to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (2)

Last edited 10 October 2005 at 8:00am
Publication date: 
10 October, 2005

Summary

Greenpeace submitted evidence on the problems of building a new generation of nuclear power stations, and the altenative measures that could be used to reduce CO2 emmissionsand provide electricity through renewable, decentralised energy systems.

Download the report:

Follow Greenpeace UK